Alternative scenarios for Federal transportation policy. Volume II. Policy review and scenario development. First year final report

In 2007 the Independent Scientific Group (ISG) reported to the UK government the impact on bovine tuberculosis (TB) in cattle of a trial where badgers were culled between 1998 and 2005. This trial, known as the Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT), was performed across 100 km2 (nominal) zones in the West of England. The results were based on a model of new herd incidence data. It was concluded that reactive culling generated overall detrimental effects, while proactive culling achieved very modest overall benefits at the cost of elevated incidence in surrounding areas. This work looks at more extensive RBCT data to examine if these findings hold true. Instead of presenting the results of a model, this work directly illustrates the data. The Animal and Plant Health Agency supplied this data in March 2016. Such data covers a greater number of years (1986 to 2012) and includes the prevalence of herd restrictions as well as herd incidence. Whilst the proactive culls substantially and sustainably reduced cattle TB in treated areas, such culls did not significantly increase TB in the surrounding areas. In fact New Herd Incidents (NHI’s) between 2006 and 2012 dropped by 28%, 1% and 18% in the treated, outer 2km ring, and combined areas respectively. Based on the number of NHI’s prevented since 1998, a break-even cost to complete a badger removal exercise was calculated to be £8,454 per km2. This figure may be under-estimated because it takes no account of any NHI’s prevented after 2012. The more limited reactive culls were found to have no significant impact. This applied to both the treated area and outer 2km ring. The data also showed that the culls only reduced confirmed TB with no significant impact on unconfirmed TB. This was also found by the ISG when they reported results in 2007. Conclusions in the RBCT final report were made based on incomplete data so are poorly grounded. In addition to this, many mass media outlets are already adversely reporting the impact for culls which started in South West England in 2013. In the RBCT, after the first year of substantial culling, 9 years of data were needed to clearly see the full extent by which TB dropped when the data was not time-shifted. It is likely that the impact of the 2013 culls will not become clear until sometime between 2020 and 2025.

Download Full-text

Safety concept, FEP catalogue and scenario development as fundamentals of a long-term safety demonstration for high-level waste repositories in German clay formations

Geological Society London Special Publications ◽

10.1144/sp482.6 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 482 (1) ◽

pp. 313-329 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

A. Lommerzheim ◽

M. Jobmann ◽

A. Meleshyn ◽

S. Mrugalla ◽

A. Rübel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

System Analysis ◽

Selection Process ◽

High Level Waste ◽

Reference Scenario ◽

Safety Concept ◽

Scenario Development ◽

Future System ◽

Alternative Scenarios ◽

High Level ◽

Waste Repositories

AbstractA safety concept and a safety demonstration concept for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste in German clay formations have been developed. The main safety objective is to retain the radionuclides inside a ‘Containment Providing Rock Zone’. Thus, the radionuclide transport should be restrained by adequate safety functions of the geological and geotechnical barriers. The compliance with legal dose constraints has to be demonstrated for probable evolutions and less probable evolutions.As a basis for system analysis, generic geological reference models, disposal concepts and repository designs have been developed for northern and southern Germany. All data relevant for future system evolution were compiled in two FEP (features, events and processes) catalogues. They provide information on FEP characteristics, their probabilities of occurrence, their interactions and identify ‘initial FEP’ that impair the safety functions of relevant barriers. A probable reference scenario has been deduced systematically from the probable ‘initial FEP’, and from probable processes relevant for radionuclide mobilization and transport. Four different starting points to develop alternative scenarios (i.e. less probable evolutions) were identified.The scenario development methodology is applicable to different kinds of host rock and therefore may be a basis for the preliminary safety analyses necessary in the future site selection process in Germany.

Download Full-text