scholarly journals ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEILLANCE OF A NUCLEAR FACILITY.

1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. K. Soldat ◽  
C. M. Unruh
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Surveillance ◽  
Nuclear Facility

Superposition of Potential Chemical Polluants and Radioisotopes and Their Influence Upon the Environment and Living Organisms

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (9) ◽  
pp. 2189-2195
Author(s):  
Valeriu V. Jinescu ◽  
Simona Eugenia Manea ◽  
George Jinescu ◽  
Vali Ifigenia Nicolof
Keyword(s):  
Solid Waste ◽  
Critical Energy ◽  
Radioactive Isotopes ◽  
Nuclear Facility ◽  
Chemical Pollutants ◽  
Living Organisms

Following the activities developed in a nuclear facility result gaseous and liquid radioactive effluents and radioactive solid waste. All these waste contain radioactive isotopes which are potentially pollutants for the environment. In the same time chemicals are, also, pollutants. According to the legislation, discharging of chemicals and radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents into the environment, should meet the requirements of the unrestricted discharge. However, what happens when several pollutants superpose: only chemical pollutants, or only radioactive pollutants, or chemical and radioactive pollutants? Such problems have been solved in this paper on the basis of the principle of critical energy.

Retention of Some Radionuclides on Soil in Site Selection for Nuclear Facility

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 658-666
Author(s):  
D. M. Imam ◽  
M. M. Hamed ◽  
M. F. Attallah
Keyword(s):  
Site Selection ◽  
Nuclear Facility ◽  
Selection For

scholarly journals Detection of coronavirus in environmental surveillance and risk monitoring for pandemic control

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 3656-3676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linlin Yao ◽  
Wenting Zhu ◽  
Jianbo Shi ◽  
Tailin Xu ◽  
Guangbo Qu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Surveillance ◽  
Environmental Transmission ◽  
Risk Monitoring ◽  
Novel Coronavirus

A schematic illustration of the environmental transmission of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2 as an example) under different scenarios during the COVID-19 pandemic.

scholarly journals Inferring Numbers of Wild Poliovirus Excretors Using Quantitative Environmental Surveillance

Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 870
Author(s):  
Yuri Perepliotchikov ◽  
Tomer Ziv-Baran ◽  
Musa Hindiyeh ◽  
Yossi Manor ◽  
Danit Sofer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Polio Vaccine ◽  
Turnaround Time ◽  
Quantitative Detection ◽  
Environmental Surveillance ◽  
Wild Poliovirus ◽  
Polio Vaccine ◽  
Kinetic Information ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Number Of Individuals

Response to and monitoring of viral outbreaks can be efficiently focused when rapid, quantitative, kinetic information provides the location and the number of infected individuals. Environmental surveillance traditionally provides information on location of populations with contagious, infected individuals since infectious poliovirus is excreted whether infections are asymptomatic or symptomatic. Here, we describe development of rapid (1 week turnaround time, TAT), quantitative RT-PCR of poliovirus RNA extracted directly from concentrated environmental surveillance samples to infer the number of infected individuals excreting poliovirus. The quantitation method was validated using data from vaccination with bivalent oral polio vaccine (bOPV). The method was then applied to infer the weekly number of excreters in a large, sustained, asymptomatic outbreak of wild type 1 poliovirus in Israel (2013) in a population where >90% of the individuals received three doses of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV). Evidence-based intervention strategies were based on the short TAT for direct quantitative detection. Furthermore, a TAT shorter than the duration of poliovirus excretion allowed resampling of infected individuals. Finally, the method documented absence of infections after successful intervention of the asymptomatic outbreak. The methodologies described here can be applied to outbreaks of other excreted viruses such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), where there are (1) significant numbers of asymptomatic infections; (2) long incubation times during which infectious virus is excreted; and (3) limited resources, facilities, and manpower that restrict the number of individuals who can be tested and re-tested.

scholarly journals The Implementation of Active Environmental Surveillance in a Veterinary Referral Hospital Setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s409-s409
Author(s):  
Emily Feyes ◽  
Dixie Mollenkopf ◽  
Thomas Wittum ◽  
Dubraska Diaz-Campos ◽  
Rikki Horne
Keyword(s):  
Veterinary Medicine ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Ohio State University ◽  
Hospital Environment ◽  
State University ◽  
Environmental Surveillance ◽  
University College ◽  
Animal Contact ◽  
Contact Surfaces ◽  
The Ohio State University

Emily Feyes, The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine; Dixie Mollenkopf, The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine; Thomas Wittum, The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine; Dubraska Diaz-Campos, The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine; Rikki Horne, The Ohio State University College of Veterinary MedicineBackground: The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine (OSU-CVM) Antimicrobial Stewardship Working Group (ASWG) uses monthly environmental surveillance to understand the effectiveness of our veterinary medical center (VMC) infection control and biosecurity protocols in reducing environmental contamination with multidrug resistant organisms. Monthly surveillance allows us to monitor trends in the recovery of these resistant organisms and address issues of concern that could impact our patients, clients, staff, and students. Methods: The OSU-CVM ASWG collects samples from >100 surfaces within the companion animal, farm animal, and equine sections of our hospital each month. Sampling has been continuous since January 2018. Samples are collected from both human–animal contact and human-only contact surfaces using Swiffer electrostatic cloths. These samples are cultured for recovery of Salmonella spp, extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. Results: The recovery of these antibiotic resistant target organisms is low in the environment of our hospital. Recovery from human-only contact surfaces (19.8%) is very similar to recovery from human–animal contact surfaces (25.5%). We commonly recover Enterobacteriaceae (E.coli, Klebsiella spp, and Enterobacter spp) that are resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins (496 of 2,016; 24.6%) from the VMC environment. These antibiotic-resistant indicator bacteria are expected in a veterinary hospital setting where use the of β-lactam drugs is common. Recovery of both Salmonella spp and CPE has remained very low in our hospital environment over the past 19 months: 16 of 2,016 (0.7%) for Salmonella and 15 of 2,016 (0.8%) for CPE. Discussion: The active environmental surveillance component of our antimicrobial stewardship program has allowed us to reduce the threat of nosocomial infections within our hospital and address environmental contamination issues before they become a problem. Our consistently low recovery of resistant organisms indicates the effectiveness of our existing cleaning and disinfection protocols and biosecurity measures. Due to the nature of our patient population, we do expect to find resistant organisms in the patient-contact areas of the hospital environment. However, our similar rates of resistant organisms from human-only surfaces (eg, computer keyboards, door handles, telephones, and Cubex machines) indicates a need to improve our hand hygiene practices. These data are now supporting the implementation of a new hand hygiene campaign in our veterinary hospital.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document