scholarly journals CONTAMINATED SOIL REMOVAL FACILITY, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON. Environmental Statement.

1972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Not Given Author
2001 ◽  
Vol 60 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 107-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.E Hellawell ◽  
A.C Kemp ◽  
D.J Nancarrow

2013 ◽  
Vol 448-453 ◽  
pp. 498-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin De Cai ◽  
Dong Ying Wang ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Shi Yin Li ◽  
Lai Guo Chen

A static aeration biopile process was used to bioremediate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-contaminated soil using four different approaches for treating about 30 m3 of soil at a former oil-producing site. The four treatments investigated were as follows: (i) fertilizer plus bulking agent (FB); (ii) fertilizer, bulking agent, plus Tween 80 (FBT); (iii) fertilizer, bulking agent, Tween 80, plus fungi agent (FBTF); and (iv) fertilizer, bulking agent, bacterial inoculum, plus fungi agent (FBBF). After bioremediation for 320 days, the total amount of 16 PAHs ranged from 4.14 to 5.31 mg/kg in the final soil, removal rates ranging from 75.5% to 81.5%. The sum concentration of seven carcinogenic PAHs decreased down to 0.15 mg/kg. The values of the total toxicity equivalence concentrations for 16 PAHs ranged from 0.014 to 0.068 mg/kg. The removal rates of the 16 PAHs in these four different treatments decreased in order FBBF > FBT > FBTF > FB.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 148
Author(s):  
Nesreen Kurdy Al-Obaidy ◽  
Assad Al-Shueli ◽  
Hawraa Sattar ◽  
Zainab Majeed ◽  
Noor Al Huda Hamid

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document