EERE Strategic Program Review

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
None None
Keyword(s):  
Program Review ◽  
Strategic Program

Equine Program Review

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peggy M. Auwerda ◽  
Nicole S. Ferwerda
Keyword(s):  
Program Review

scholarly journals The Emergence of AGHE's Basic-Competencies Guidelines in Gerontology

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 553-553
Author(s):  
Robert Maiden
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Program Analysis ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Program Review ◽  
Self Reflection ◽  
Living Entity ◽  
Geriatric Education ◽  
Basic Competencies ◽  
Basic Competency ◽  
Improve Instruction

Abstract This presentation will explore the development of AGHE’s major contemporary contribution: AGHE’s basic-competency guidelines and their role in program review and program enhancement. The presenter will describe in detail the steps in creating objective student learning outcomes and will explore how meeting these competencies improve instruction, self-reflection, program analysis and faculty discussion and ultimately gerontology programs. These guidelines and policies embody a living entity that is always evolving. Future iterations will be anticipated and discussed. Part of a symposium sponsored by the Geriatric Education Interest Group.

CURRICULAR SYNCOPATIONSGetting started with a program review

ACM Inroads ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 26-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry M. Walker
Keyword(s):  
Program Review

scholarly journals Survey of Gravitationally Lensed Objects in HSC Imaging (SuGOHI) – VII. Discovery and confirmation of three strongly lensed quasars†

2021 ◽  
Vol 502 (1) ◽  
pp. 1487-1493
Author(s):  
Anton T Jaelani ◽  
Cristian E Rusu ◽  
Issha Kayo ◽  
Anupreeta More ◽  
Alessandro Sonnenfeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spectroscopic Data ◽  
Point Sources ◽  
Sloan Digital Sky Survey ◽  
Early Type ◽  
Blue Point ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Quasar Spectra ◽  
Strategic Program ◽  
Early Type Galaxy

ABSTRACT We present spectroscopic confirmation of three new two-image gravitationally lensed quasars, compiled from existing strong lens and X-ray catalogues. Images of HSC J091843.27–022007.5 show a red galaxy with two blue point sources at either side, separated by 2.26 arcsec. This system has a source and a lens redshifts zs = 0.804 and zℓ = 0.459, respectively, as obtained by our follow-up spectroscopic data. CXCO J100201.50+020330.0 shows two point sources separated by 0.85 arcsec on either side of an early-type galaxy. The follow-up spectroscopic data confirm the fainter quasar has the same redshift with the brighter quasar from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) fiber spectrum at zs = 2.016. The deflecting foreground galaxy is a typical early-type galaxy at a redshift of zℓ = 0.439. SDSS J135944.21+012809.8 has two point sources with quasar spectra at the same redshift zs = 1.096, separated by 1.05 arcsec, and fits to the HSC images confirm the presence of a galaxy between these. These discoveries demonstrate the power of the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program (HSC-SSP)’s deep imaging and wide sky coverage. Combined with existing X-ray source catalogues and follow-up spectroscopy, the HSC-SSP provides us unique opportunities to find multiple-image quasars lensed by a foreground galaxy.

Use of HFE Guidance for the Review of Nuclear Power Plants

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
John O’Hara ◽  
Stephen Fleger
Keyword(s):  
Interface Design ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Health And Safety ◽  
Nuclear Regulatory Commission ◽  
Program Review ◽  
Human Factors Engineering ◽  
Plant Design ◽  
Review Model ◽  
Regulatory Commission

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) evaluates the human factors engineering (HFE) of nuclear power plant design and operations to protect public health and safety. The HFE safety reviews encompass both the design process and its products. The NRC staff performs the reviews using the detailed guidance contained in two key documents: the HFE Program Review Model (NUREG-0711) and the Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines (NUREG-0700). This paper will describe these two documents and the method used to develop them. As the NRC is committed to the periodic update and improvement of the guidance to ensure that they remain state-of-the-art design evaluation tools, we will discuss the topics being addressed in support of future updates as well.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document