scholarly journals Current status -- Second generation process tube internal corrosion

1960 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.R. Young
Author(s):  
B. C. Warboys ◽  
D. Balasubramaniam ◽  
R. M. Greenwood ◽  
G. N. C. Kirby ◽  
K. Mayes ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 205 ◽  
pp. 428-429
Author(s):  
H. Hirabayashi ◽  
Y. Murata ◽  
P.G. Edwards ◽  
D.W. Murphy ◽  
M. Inoue ◽  
...  

The VLBI Space Observatory Programme (VSOP) is the first dedicated Space-VLBI mission. We report here on the planning for a second generation mission which builds on and extends the successful collaborations established for the VSOP mission, and which aims to improve both resolution and sensitivity by a factor of ∼10.


1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. K. Huang ◽  
Ronald L. Arenson ◽  
Albert W. K. Wong ◽  
Todd M. Bazzill ◽  
Shyhliang A. Lou ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
pp. 1142-1156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shashi Kant Bhatia ◽  
Sang-Hyoun Kim ◽  
Jeong-Jun Yoon ◽  
Yung-Hun Yang

2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Harrington ◽  
Hiralal N. Khatri ◽  
Brad S. DeHoff ◽  
Martin R. Guinn ◽  
Mark A. Boehler ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 328-335
Author(s):  
Surendra Gambhir ◽  
Vijay Gambhir

This article examines the current status of Hindi in the United States, following Grin’s and Lo Bianco’s framework of language maintenance and revitalization, based on the principles of Capacity Development, Opportunity Creation, and Desire. It gives linguistic profiles of first-and second-generation speakers of Hindi and looks at the various community, state, federal, and educational initiatives that promote the use and learning of Hindi. A description of current opportunities and the desire to maintain and develop Hindi helps us understand steps needed to maintain and further vitalize Hindi as a heritage language in the United States.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Kang ◽  
Lise Appels ◽  
Tianwei Tan ◽  
Raf Dewil

“Second generation” bioethanol, with lignocellulose material as feedstock, is a promising alternative for first generation bioethanol. This paper provides an overview of the current status and reveals the bottlenecks that hamper its implementation. The current literature specifies a conversion of biomass to bioethanol of 30 to ~50% only. Novel processes increase the conversion yield to about 92% of the theoretical yield. New combined processes reduce both the number of operational steps and the production of inhibitors. Recent advances in genetically engineered microorganisms are promising for higher alcohol tolerance and conversion efficiency. By combining advanced systems and by intensive additional research to eliminate current bottlenecks, second generation bioethanol could surpass the traditional first generation processes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document