scholarly journals Decision making in flood risk based storm sewer network design

2011 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 247-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Sun ◽  
S. Djordjević ◽  
S. T. Khu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Network Design ◽  
Flood Risk ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Sewer System ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Design Storm ◽  
Sewer Network ◽  
Storm Sewer

It is widely recognised that flood risk needs to be taken into account when designing a storm sewer network. Flood risk is generally a combination of flood consequences and flood probabilities. This paper aims to explore the decision making in flood risk based storm sewer network design. A multi-objective optimization is proposed to find the Pareto front of optimal designs in terms of low construction cost and low flood risk. The decision making process then follows this multi-objective optimization to select a best design from the Pareto front. The traditional way of designing a storm sewer system based on a predefined design storm is used as one of the decision making criteria. Additionally, three commonly used risk based criteria, i.e., the expected flood risk based criterion, the Hurwicz criterion and the stochastic dominance based criterion, are investigated and applied in this paper. Different decisions are made according to different criteria as a result of different concerns represented by the criteria. The proposed procedure is applied to a simple storm sewer network design to demonstrate its effectiveness and the different criteria are compared.

Interactive evolutionary multi-objective optimization and decision-making on life-cycle seismic design of bridge

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (15) ◽  
pp. 2227-2240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Jing Li ◽  
Hong-Nan Li
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Seismic Design ◽  
Life Cycle Cost ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Procedure ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Seismic Capacity ◽  
Preference Information ◽  
Multi Objective

Considering future seismic risk and life-cycle cost, the life-cycle seismic design of bridge is formulated as a preference-based multi-objective optimization and decision-making problem, in which the conflicting design criteria that minimize life-cycle cost and maximize seismic capacity are treated simultaneously. Specifically, the preference information based on theoretical analysis and engineering judgment is embedded in the optimization procedure. Based on reasonable displacement ductility, the cost preference and safety preference information are used to progressively construct value function, directing the evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithm’s search to more preferred solutions. The seismic design of a reinforced concrete pier is presented as an application example using the proposed procedure for the global Pareto front corresponding with engineering designers’ preference. The results indicate that the proposed model is available to find the global Pareto front satisfying the corresponding preference and overcoming the difficulties of the traditional multi-objective optimization algorithm in obtaining a full approximation of the entire Pareto optimal front for large-dimensional problems as well as cognitive difficulty in selecting one preferred solution from all these solutions.

A general framework for flood risk-based storm sewer network design

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Si'Ao Sun ◽  
Slobodan Djordjević ◽  
Soon-Thiam Khu
Keyword(s):  
Network Design ◽  
Flood Risk ◽  
General Framework ◽  
Sewer Network ◽  
Storm Sewer

Applications of Multiple Objective Genetic Algorithms in the Optimization Design of Tracked Self-Moving Power’s Layout

2013 ◽  
Vol 307 ◽  
pp. 161-165
Author(s):  
Hai Jin ◽  
Jin Fa Xie
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Design ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Layout Optimization ◽  
Multiple Objective ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Layout Problem ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Multi Objective Genetic Algorithm ◽  
Set Up

A multi-objective genetic algorithm is applied into the layout optimization of tracked self-moving power. The layout optimization mathematical model was set up. Then introduced the basic principles of NSGA-Ⅱ, which is a Pareto multi-objective optimization algorithm. Finally, NSGA-Ⅱwas presented to solve the layout problem. The algorithm was proved to be effective by some practical examples. The results showed that the algorithm can spread toward the whole Pareto front, and provide many reasonable solutions once for all.

scholarly journals Multi-Objective Optimization Design of an Electrohydrostatic Actuator Based on a Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm and an Analytic Hierarchy Process

Energies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 2426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Yu ◽  
Shuai Wu ◽  
Zongxia Jiao ◽  
Yaoxing Shang
Keyword(s):  
Particle Swarm Optimization ◽  
Power Consumption ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Optimization Design ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Swarm Optimization ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Hierarchy Process

During the last few years, the concept of more-electric aircraft has been pushed ahead by industry and academics. For a more-electric actuation system, the electrohydrostatic actuator (EHA) has shown its potential for better reliability, low maintenance cost and reducing aircraft weight. Designing an EHA for aviation applications is a hard task, which should balance several inconsistent objectives simultaneously, such as weight, stiffness and power consumption. This work presents a method to obtain the optimal EHA, which combines multi-objective optimization with a synthetic decision method, that is, a multi-objective optimization design method, that can combine designers’ preferences and experiences. The evaluation model of an EHA in terms of weight, stiffness and power consumption is studied in the first section. Then, a multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm is introduced to obtain the Pareto front, and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is applied to help find the optimal design in the Pareto front. A demo of an EHA design illustrates the feasibility of the proposed method.

Multi-objective optimization for safety and reliability trade-off: Optimization and results processing

2018 ◽  
Vol 232 (6) ◽  
pp. 661-676
Author(s):  
Cristina Johansson ◽  
Johan Ölvander ◽  
Micael Derelöv
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Solid Base ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Specific System ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
Design Alternatives ◽  
Safety And Reliability ◽  
Potential Issue ◽  
Selection Of

In early design phases, it is vital to be able to screen the design space for a set of promising design alternatives for further study. This article presents a method able to balance several objectives of different mathematical natures, with high impact on the design choices. The method (MOSART) handles multi-objective optimization for safety and reliability trade-offs. The article focuses on optimization problem approach and processing of results as a base for decision-making. The output of the optimization step is the selection of specific system elements obtaining the best balance between the targets. However, what is a good base for decision can easily transform into too much information and overloading of the decision-maker. To solve this potential issue, from a set of Pareto optimal solutions, a smaller sub-set of selected solutions are visualized and filtered out using preference levels of the objectives, yielding a solid base for decision-making and valuable information on potential solutions. Trends were observed regarding each system element and discussed while processing the results of the analysis, supporting the decision of one final best solution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document