scholarly journals Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) treatment train assessment tool

2009 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 1233-1240 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Jefferies ◽  
A. Duffy ◽  
N. Berwick ◽  
N. McLean ◽  
A. Hemingway

This paper outlines a rationale and scoring system for the stormwater treatment train assessment tool (STTAT) which is a proposed regulatory tool for Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS). STTAT provides guidance and regulatory consistency for developers about the requirements of planners and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA). The tool balances the risks of pollution to the receiving water body with the treatment provided in a treatment train. It encourages developers to take SUDS into account early, avoiding any misunderstanding of SUDS requirements at the planning stage of a development. A pessimistic view on pollution risks has been adopted since there may be a change of land use on the development in the future. A realistic view has also been taken of maintenance issues and the ‘survivability’ of a SUDS component. The development of STTAT as a response to the requirements of the Water Framework Directive is explored, the individual scores being given in tabular format for receiving water and catchment risks. Treatment scores are proposed for single SUDS components as well as multiple components within treatment trains. STTAT has been tested on a range of sites, predominantly in Scotland where both development and receiving water information was known. The operational tool in use by SEPA is presented.

1997 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 89-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Krebs ◽  
Tove A. Larsen

The development of urban drainage towards sustainability is discussed, primarily on the basis of case studies of mature urban drainage systems. Typical problems and a series of possible measures to enhance the systems performance are evaluated. We consider CSOs, receiving water quality, and decreasing ground water levels as actual problems. We distinguish between improvement strategies which focus on the technical system itself (e.g. storm water retention tanks, real time control) and strategies which may be described either as source control or as improving the resilience of the receiving water. Their efficiency is evaluated on the basis of short term ‘conventional’ criteria and by means of the following sustainability criteria: systems definition (time and space constants), resource efficiency and degrees of freedom. Surprisingly, the rating of the different strategies according to the two sets of criteria are quite close: In both cases, the measures which do not narrowly focus on the technical system obtain the better score.


2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Ladson ◽  
S. Lloyd ◽  
C. J. Walsh ◽  
T. D. Fletcher ◽  
P. Horton

Monitoring the hydrochemical efficiency of urban stormwater treatment devices is not straightforward as the traditional, automated, In urban areas, efficient drainage of impervious surfaces means that polluted stormwater is frequently delivered to streams. Commonly, catchment urbanization can increase runoff frequency by a factor of 10 or more, as the effective imperviousness - the proportion of the catchment that consists of impervious surfaces drained to streams - is increased. This causes a decline in stream health. To decrease runoff frequency, effective imperviousness must be reduced. This requires urban drainage systems to be redesigned, using techniques such as infiltration and rainwater harvesting, so that stormwater from small rain events is not piped directly to streams but instead is infiltrated, reused or retained. We have developed scenarios that explore alternative urban drainage systems appropriate for a small partly urbanised catchment in Melbourne’s east. These scenarios incorporate, biofiltration basins, swales and dual purpose rainwater tanks that supply water for householders. Our results suggested that sufficient reductions in effective imperviousness and runoff frequency are possible to achieve improvements in stream health.


2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 257-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.G. Schmitt ◽  
M. Thomas ◽  
N. Ettrich

The European research project in the EUREKA framework, RisUrSim is presented with its overall objective to develop an integrated planning tool to allow cost effective management for urban drainage systems. The project consortium consisted of industrial mathematics and water engineering research institutes, municipal drainage works as well as an insurance company. The paper relates to the regulatory background of European Standard EN 752 and the need of a more detailed methodology to simulate urban flooding. The analysis of urban flooding caused by surcharged sewers in urban drainage systems leads to the necessity of a dual drainage modeling. A detailed dual drainage simulation model is described based upon hydraulic flow routing procedures for surface flow and pipe flow. Special consideration is given to the interaction between surface and sewer flow during surcharge conditions in order to most accurately compute water levels above ground as a basis for further assessments of possible damage costs. The model application is presented for a small case study in terms of data needs, model verification and first simulation results.


2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 750-759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Jafari ◽  
S. Jamshid Mousavi ◽  
Jafar Yazdi ◽  
Joong Hoon Kim

2015 ◽  
pp. 101-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vianney Courdent ◽  
Luca Vezzaro ◽  
Peter Steen Mikkelsen ◽  
Ane Loft Mollerup ◽  
Morten Grum

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document