Disinfection of domestic water systems for Legionella pneumophila

2003 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 341-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Campos ◽  
J. F. Loret ◽  
A. J. Cooper ◽  
R. F. Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Legionella Pneumophila ◽  
Water Systems ◽  
Domestic Water

Adhesion of Legionella pneumophila on glass and plumbing materials commonly used in domestic water systems

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdelwahid Assaidi ◽  
Mostafa Ellouali ◽  
Hassan Latrache ◽  
Mustapha Mabrouki ◽  
Mohammed Timinouni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Legionella Pneumophila ◽  
Water Systems ◽  
Domestic Water

scholarly journals Highlighting the Potency of Biosurfactants Produced by Pseudomonas Strains as Anti-Legionella Agents

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clémence Loiseau ◽  
Emilie Portier ◽  
Marie-Hélène Corre ◽  
Margot Schlusselhuber ◽  
Ségolène Depayras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Legionella Pneumophila ◽  
Close Association ◽  
Water Systems ◽  
Antagonistic Activity ◽  
Reverse Phase Hplc ◽  
Reverse Phase ◽  
Free Living ◽  
Legionnaires Disease ◽  
Culture Supernatants ◽  
Multispecies Biofilms

Legionella pneumophila, the causative agent of Legionnaires’ disease, is a waterborne bacterium mainly found in man-made water systems in close association with free-living amoebae and multispecies biofilms. Pseudomonas strains, originating from various environments including freshwater systems or isolated from hospitalized patients, were tested for their antagonistic activity towards L. pneumophila. A high amount of tested strains was thus found to be active. This antibacterial activity was correlated to the presence of tensioactive agents in culture supernatants. As Pseudomonas strains were known to produce biosurfactants, these compounds were specifically extracted and purified from active strains and further characterized using reverse-phase HPLC and mass spectrometry methods. Finally, all biosurfactants tested (lipopeptides and rhamnolipids) were found active and this activity was shown to be higher towards Legionella strains compared to various other bacteria. Therefore, described biosurfactants are potent anti-Legionella agents that could be used in the water treatment industry although tests are needed to evaluate how effective they would be under field conditions.

scholarly journals Necrotrophic Growth of Legionella pneumophila

2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 4323-4328 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Temmerman ◽  
H. Vervaeren ◽  
B. Noseda ◽  
N. Boon ◽  
W. Verstraete
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Legionella Pneumophila ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Water Systems ◽  
Saccharomyces Boulardii ◽  
Wall Structure ◽  
Lower Growth ◽  
Average Growth ◽  
Microbial Cells

ABSTRACT This study examined whether Legionella pneumophila is able to thrive on heat-killed microbial cells (necrotrophy) present in biofilms or heat-treated water systems. Quantification by means of plate counting, real-time PCR, and flow cytometry demonstrated necrotrophic growth of L. pneumophila in water after 96 h, when at least 100 dead cells are available to one L. pneumophila cell. Compared to the starting concentration of L. pneumophila, the maximum observed necrotrophic growth was 1.89 log units for real-time PCR and 1.49 log units for plate counting. The average growth was 1.57 � 0.32 log units (n = 5) for real-time PCR and 1.14 � 0.35 log units (n = 5) for plate counting. Viability staining and flow cytometry showed that the fraction of living cells in the L. pneumophila population rose from the initial 54% to 82% after 96 h. Growth was measured on heat-killed Pseudomonas putida, Escherichia coli, Acanthamoeba castellanii, Saccharomyces boulardii, and a biofilm sample. Gram-positive organisms did not result in significant growth of L. pneumophila, probably due to their robust cell wall structure. Although necrotrophy showed lower growth yields compared to replication within protozoan hosts, these findings indicate that it may be of major importance in the environmental persistence of L. pneumophila. Techniques aimed at the elimination of protozoa or biofilm from water systems will not necessarily result in a subsequent removal of L. pneumophila unless the formation of dead microbial cells is minimized.

scholarly journals Biodiversity of Amoebae and Amoeba-Resisting Bacteria in a Hospital Water Network

2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 2428-2438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Thomas ◽  
Katia Herrera-Rimann ◽  
Dominique S. Blanc ◽  
Gilbert Greub
Keyword(s):  
Legionella Pneumophila ◽  
Strong Association ◽  
Acanthamoeba Castellanii ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Water Network ◽  
Water Control ◽  
Domestic Water ◽  
Mycobacterium Xenopi ◽  
Hartmannella Vermiformis ◽  
Human Infections

ABSTRACT Free-living amoebae (FLA) are ubiquitous organisms that have been isolated from various domestic water systems, such as cooling towers and hospital water networks. In addition to their own pathogenicity, FLA can also act as Trojan horses and be naturally infected with amoeba-resisting bacteria (ARB) that may be involved in human infections, such as pneumonia. We investigated the biodiversity of bacteria and their amoebal hosts in a hospital water network. Using amoebal enrichment on nonnutrient agar, we isolated 15 protist strains from 200 (7.5%) samples. One thermotolerant Hartmannella vermiformis isolate harbored both Legionella pneumophila and Bradyrhizobium japonicum. By using amoebal coculture with axenic Acanthamoeba castellanii as the cellular background, we recovered at least one ARB from 45.5% of the samples. Four new ARB isolates were recovered by culture, and one of these isolates was widely present in the water network. Alphaproteobacteria (such as Rhodoplanes, Methylobacterium, Bradyrhizobium, Afipia, and Bosea) were recovered from 30.5% of the samples, mycobacteria (Mycobacterium gordonae, Mycobacterium kansasii, and Mycobacterium xenopi) were recovered from 20.5% of the samples, and Gammaproteobacteria (Legionella) were recovered from 5.5% of the samples. No Chlamydia or Chlamydia-like organisms were recovered by amoebal coculture or detected by PCR. The observed strong association between the presence of amoebae and the presence of Legionella (P < 0.001) and mycobacteria (P = 0.009) further suggests that FLA are a reservoir for these ARB and underlines the importance of considering amoebae when water control measures are designed.

Computational framework for evaluating risk trade-offs in costs associated with Legionnaires’ Disease risk, energy, and scalding risk for hospital hot water systems

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Heida ◽  
Alexis Mraz ◽  
Mark Hamilton ◽  
Mark Weir ◽  
Kerry A Hamilton
Keyword(s):  
Legionella Pneumophila ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Disease Outbreaks ◽  
Febrile Illness ◽  
Water Systems ◽  
Hot Water ◽  
Computational Framework ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
Pontiac Fever ◽  
Legionnaires Disease

Legionella pneumophila are bacteria that when inhaled cause Legionnaires’ Disease (LD) and febrile illness Pontiac Fever. As of 2014, LD is the most frequent cause of waterborne disease outbreaks due...

Effect of heat flushing on the concentrations of Legionella pneumophila and other heterotrophic microbes in hot water systems of apartment buildings

1996 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 811-818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Outi M. Zacheus ◽  
Pertti J. Martikainen
Keyword(s):  
Water Temperature ◽  
Legionella Pneumophila ◽  
Heterotrophic Bacteria ◽  
Water System ◽  
Water Systems ◽  
Hot Water ◽  
Circulating Water ◽  
Heterotrophic Microbes ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Circulating Water System

The decontamination of Legionella pneumophila and other heterotrophic microbes by heat flushing in four legionellae-positive hot water systems was studied. Before the decontamination procedure, the concentration of legionellae varied from 3.0 × 10−3 to 3.5 × 10−5 cfu/L and the hot water temperature from 43.6 to 51.5 °C. During the contamination the temperature was raised to 60–70 °C. All taps and showers were cleaned from sediments and flushed with hot water twice a day for several minutes. The decontamination lasted for 2–4 weeks. In a few weeks the heat-flushing method reduced the concentration of legionellae below the detection limit (50 cfu/L) in the hot circulating water system just before and after the heat exchanger. The high hot water temperature also decreased the viable counts of heterotrophic bacteria, fungi, and total microbial cells determined by the epifluorescent microscopy. However, the eradication of legionellae failed in a water system where the water temperature remained below 60 °C in some parts of the system. After the decontamination, the temperature of hot water was lowered to 55 °C. Thereafter, all the studied hot water systems were recolonized by legionellae within a few months, showing that the decontamination by heat flushing was temporary. Also, the contamination of other bacteria increased in a few months to the level before decontamination.Key words: legionellae, hot water system, decontamination, water temperature, heterotrophic bacteria.

scholarly journals Comparison of disinfectants for biofilm, protozoa and Legionella control

2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 423-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Loret ◽  
S. Robert ◽  
V. Thomas ◽  
Y. Lévi ◽  
A. J. Cooper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chlorine Dioxide ◽  
Residual Activity ◽  
Water Systems ◽  
Treatment Efficiency ◽  
Domestic Water ◽  
Continuous Application ◽  
Simulation Unit ◽  
Equivalent Conditions ◽  
Domestic Water Supply ◽  
Initial Contamination

The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of different disinfectants applicable to Legionella control in domestic water systems. A domestic water supply simulation unit that allowed simulation of real-world conditions was developed for this purpose. The system, consisting of seven identical rigs, was used to compare treatment efficiency under equivalent conditions of system design, materials, hydraulics, water quality, temperature and initial contamination. During the study, each of six loops received continuous application of one of the following disinfectants: chlorine, electro-chlorination, chlorine dioxide, monochloramine, ozone, or copper/silver. The seventh loop was used as a control and remained untreated. Performance evaluation of these disinfectants was based on their ability to reduce not only Legionella, but also protozoa and biofilms, which contribute to the establishment and dissemination of these bacteria in water systems, and their resistance to treatments. Regarding these criteria, chlorine dioxide and chlorine (as bleach or obtained by electro-chlorination) were the most effective treatments in this study. However, in comparison with chlorine, chlorine dioxide showed a longer residual activity in the system, which constituted an advantage in the perspective of an application to extensive pipework systems.

Managing Legionella pneumophila in Water Systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 10-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark W. LeChevallier
Keyword(s):  
Legionella Pneumophila ◽  
Water Systems
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document