scholarly journals Intravitreal aflibercept for exudative age-related macular degeneration with good visual acuity: 2-year results of a prospective study

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 1137-1147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinichi Sakamoto ◽  
Hidenori Takahashi ◽  
Yuji Inoue ◽  
Yusuke Arai ◽  
Satoru Inoda ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 247412642199705
Author(s):  
Halward M.J. Blegen ◽  
Samuel D. Hobbs ◽  
Reggie Taylor ◽  
Andrew L. Plaster ◽  
Paul M. Drayna

Purpose: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is useful in diagnosing and monitoring retinal pathology such as age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema (DME), central serous chorioretinopathy, and epiretinal membrane, among others. This study compared the ability of horizontal (H) 25-, 13-, and 7-cut macular OCT vs 24-, 12-, and 6-cut radial (R) macular OCT in identifying various macular pathology. Methods: This was a prospective study of 161 established patients evaluated at Wilford Hall Eye Center Retina Clinic between September and October of 2019. Pathology included age-related macular degeneration, central serous chorioretinopathy, DME, and epiretinal membrane, among others. Patients obtained 25-, 13-, and 7-cut H raster OCT as well as 24-, 12-, and 6-cut R OCT. Primary outcomes were sensitivity in detecting macular fluid and each macular abnormality. Results: The 24-cut radial (R24) OCT equally or out-performed the H25 (horizontal 25-cut OCT) in detecting macular fluid across all pathological groups. Generally, a higher number of cuts correlated with better detection of fluid. In detecting any macular abnormalities, H25, R24, and R12 had 100% sensitivity. R6 OCT had near 100% sensitivity across all groups, except for DME (95%). Overall, R OCT had better sensitivity (0.960) than H OCT (0.907) in detecting macular pathology. Conclusions: R outperformed H macular OCT in detecting fluid and other abnormalities. Clinically, both scanning patterns can be used by ophthalmologists in diagnosis and management of commonly encountered macular diseases. Technicians may be able to use a variety of these scans to screen for pathology prior to physician evaluation.


1999 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umed A Ajani ◽  
William G Christen ◽  
Joann E Manson ◽  
Robert J Glynn ◽  
Debra Schaumberg ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 236 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Wolf ◽  
Francesco Bandello ◽  
Anat Loewenstein ◽  
Jason Slakter ◽  
Todd Katz ◽  
...  

Purpose: The aim was to describe baseline characteristics of the fellow eye of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: A pooled, post hoc analysis of patients with nAMD enrolled in the VIEW studies was carried out. The VIEW studies compared intravitreal aflibercept (monthly or every 2 months after 3 monthly injections) with monthly ranibizumab. Baseline choroidal neovascularization (CNV) status of fellow eyes and baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and lens status of all eyes were evaluated. Additional analyses evaluated the presence of drusen and pigment in fellow eyes. Results: When comparing both eyes, baseline BCVA was worse in 23.8% of fellow eyes and in 75.2% of study eyes. Lens status of fellow eyes and study eyes was similar. Baseline visual acuity of the study eye and that of the fellow eye were not correlated. Most fellow eyes had signs of early AMD, with 34.6% (n = 843) of fellow eyes having evidence of scarring. Conclusions: In patients in the VIEW studies, most fellow eyes had evidence of AMD, highlighting the importance of examining both eyes, with close follow-up thereafter, in order to detect and treat CNV earlier as needed.


Retina ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 1811-1820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Axer-Siegel ◽  
Elite Bor ◽  
Dan H. Bourla ◽  
Dov Weinberger ◽  
Karin Mimouni

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Weber ◽  
Laurent Velasque ◽  
Florence Coscas ◽  
Céline Faure ◽  
Isabelle Aubry ◽  
...  

Background/aimsTo monitor treatment-naïve patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD) receiving intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in France.MethodsRAINBOW (Real life use of intravitreal Aflibercept In FraNce - oBservatiOnal study in Wet age-related macular degeneration) is an ongoing, observational, retrospective and prospective 4-year study to assess visual (primary), anatomical and safety outcomes following IVT-AFL treatment in wet AMD patients. We report the interim 12-month outcomes in patients who have already been enrolled.ResultsSafety data were analysed from 586 patients (safety analysis set); and effectiveness data were analysed from 502 patients with at least one follow-up (full-analysis set) and from 353 patients with visual acuity data at baseline and month 12. The mean (SD) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 56.7 (18.2) letters and the mean (SD) central retinal thickness (CRT) was 395.6 (140.5)µm at baseline. Most patients (76.9%) received a loading dose (first three injections within 90 days). The mean (SD) number of IVT-AFL injections over 12 months was 6.0 (2.1) and 6.6 (1.8) (patients who received a loading dose). The mean (SD) change in BCVA was 5.5 (15.0) letters and 6.8 (14.5) letters (patients who received a loading dose) at month 12 (p<0.001 vs baseline). The mean (SD) CRT reduction was –108.7 (146.8)µm and –116.4 (150.4)µm (loading dose) at month 12 (p<0.001 vs baseline). Overall, 118 (20.1%) patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), 1.2% experienced ocular TEAEs and 3.9% experienced serious AEs.ConclusionThis 12-month interim analysis showed that IVT-AFL was associated with sustained improvements in a real-world setting. The RAINBOW results are consistent with the VIEW clinical studies.Trial registration numberNCT02279537 Pre-results.


2008 ◽  
Vol 102 (10) ◽  
pp. 600-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet S. Sunness ◽  
Gary S. Rubin ◽  
Abraham Zuckerbrod ◽  
Carol A. Applegate

Foveal-sparing scotomas are common in advanced dry macular degeneration (geographic atrophy). Foveal preservation may be present for a number of years. Despite good visual acuity, these patients have reduced reading rates. Magnification may not be effective if the text becomes too large to “fit” within the central spared area.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document