scholarly journals The effect of exercise on cancer-related fatigue in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 479-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen Kessels ◽  
Olga Husson ◽  
Christina M Van der Feltz-Cornelis
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cancer Related Fatigue

scholarly journals Pharmacological Interventions for the Management of Cancer-Related Fatigue Among Cancer Survivors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153473542110380
Author(s):  
Xuemei Sun ◽  
Yancong Chen ◽  
William KW Cheung ◽  
Irene XY Wu ◽  
Fang Xiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Natural Products ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Minimal Important Difference ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Pharmacological Interventions ◽  
Cancer Related Fatigue

Objective: Current guidelines have different recommendations on applying pharmacological interventions for managing cancer-related fatigue (CRF) among cancer survivors. This systematic review aims to synthesize clinical evidence on pharmacological interventions for managing CRF. Methods: Five databases were searched for potential randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from their inception until October 2020. RCTs assessing the effect of pharmacological treatments for CRF among cancer survivors were considered eligible. Clinical significance was determined by comparing the estimated effect with that of minimal important difference (MID). The risk of bias of each included RCT was appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials 2. Data were synthesized using random-effect pairwise meta-analyses. Results: A total of 15 RCTs (1238 participants) were included. The majority presented some concerns of bias arising from the randomization process and selection of the reported results. Meta-analysis showed that psychostimulant and wakefulness agents had statistically significant while clinically insignificant effects on the treatment of CRF (pooled weighted mean difference [WMD]: 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.2-5.4, I2: 0%, 3 RCTs, MID: 3.0-6.0). Three natural products, including Renshen Yangrong Tang (mean difference [MD]: −16.1, 95% CI: −8.9 to −23.3, MID: −17.3 to −11.4), Tualang honey (MD: 11.2, 95% CI: 7.1-15.3, MID: 3.0-6.0), and Shenmai injection plus Peptisorb (MD: −1.6, 95% CI: −2.1 to −1.1, MID: −1.1 to −0.8) demonstrated statistically and clinically significant effect in reducing CRF. Conclusions: Existing evidence showed promising effects of 3 natural products in reducing CRF among cancer survivors. The results from this study need to be further confirmed with well-designed and adequately powered RCTs that use validated instruments for the measurement of CRF.

Pharmacological interventions for the management of cancer-related fatigue among cancer survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuemei Sun ◽  
Yancong Chen ◽  
William Cheung ◽  
Irene Wu ◽  
Fang Xiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Natural Products ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Weighted Mean Difference ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Minimal Important Difference ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Pharmacological Interventions ◽  
Cancer Related Fatigue

BACKGROUND Background: Current guidelines have different recommendations on applying pharmacological interventions for managing cancer-related fatigue (CRF) among cancer survivors. OBJECTIVE Objective: This systematic review aims to synthesize clinical evidence on pharmacological interventions for managing CRF. METHODS Methods: Five databases were searched for potential Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from their inception till October 2020. RCTs assessing the effect of pharmacological treatments for CRF among cancer survivors were considered eligible. Clinical significance was determined by comparing the estimated effect with that of minimal important difference (MID). The risk of bias of included RCTs were appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials 2. RESULTS Results: A total of 15 RCTs (1238 participants) were included. Majority presented some concerns of bias arising from the randomization process and selection of the reported result. Meta-analysis showed that psychostimulant and wakefulness agents had statistically significant while clinical insignificant effect on the treatment of CRF (pooled weighted mean difference (WMD): 2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2 to 5.4, I2: 0%, 3 RCTs, MID: 3.0 to 6.0). Three natural products, including Renshen Yangrong Tang (mean difference (MD): -16.1, 95% CI: -8.9 to -23.3, MID: -17.3 to -11.4), Tualang honey (MD: 11.2, 95% CI: 7.1 to 15.3, MID: 3.0 to 6.0) and Shenmai injection plus Peptisorb (MD: -1.6, 95% CI: -2.1 to -1.1, MID: -1.1 to -0.8) demonstrated statistically and clinically significant effect in reducing CRF. CONCLUSIONS Conclusions: Existing evidence showed promising effects of three natural products in reducing CRF among cancer survivors. The results from this study need to be further confirmed with well-designed and adequate powered RCTs that use validated instruments for the measurement of CRF. CLINICALTRIAL The protocol of this systematic review has been registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42018102347).

scholarly journals Effects of open-label placebos in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Melina von Wernsdorff ◽  
Martin Loef ◽  
Brunna Tuschen-Caffier ◽  
Stefan Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Medical Condition ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cancer Related Fatigue ◽  
Promising Treatment ◽  
Irritable Bowel

AbstractOpen-label placebos (OLPs) are placebos without deception in the sense that patients know that they are receiving a placebo. The objective of our study is to systematically review and analyze the effect of OLPs in comparison to no treatment in clinical trials. A systematic literature search was carried out in February 2020. Randomized controlled trials of any medical condition or mental disorder comparing OLPs to no treatment were included. Data extraction and risk of bias rating were independently assessed. 1246 records were screened and thirteen studies were included into the systematic review. Eleven trials were eligible for meta-analysis. These trials assessed effects of OLPs on back pain, cancer-related fatigue, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, allergic rhinitis, major depression, irritable bowel syndrome and menopausal hot flushes. Risk of bias was moderate among all studies. We found a significant overall effect (standardized mean difference = 0.72, 95% Cl 0.39–1.05, p < 0.0001, I2 = 76%) of OLP. Thus, OLPs appear to be a promising treatment in different conditions but the respective research is in its infancy. More research is needed, especially with respect to different medical and mental disorders and instructions accompanying the OLP administration as well as the role of expectations and mindsets.

scholarly journals Effects of Supervised Multimodal Exercise Interventions on Cancer-Related Fatigue: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Francisco Meneses-Echávez ◽  
Emilio González-Jiménez ◽  
Robinson Ramírez-Vélez
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Resistance Training ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Exercise Interventions ◽  
Training Interventions ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cancer Related Fatigue

Objective. Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is the most common and devastating problem in cancer patients even after successful treatment. This study aimed to determine the effects of supervised multimodal exercise interventions on cancer-related fatigue through a systematic review and meta-analysis.Design. A systematic review was conducted to determine the effectiveness of multimodal exercise interventions on CRF. Databases of PubMed, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and OVID were searched between January and March 2014 to retrieve randomized controlled trials. Risk of bias was evaluated using the PEDro scale.Results. Nine studiesn=772were included in both systematic review and meta-analysis. Multimodal interventions including aerobic exercise, resistance training, and stretching improved CRF symptoms (SMD=-0.23; 95% CI: −0.37 to −0.09;P=0.001). These effects were also significant in patients undergoing chemotherapyP<0.0001. Nonsignificant differences were found for resistance training interventionsP=0.30. Slight evidence of publication bias was observedP=0.04. The studies had a low risk of bias (PEDro scale mean score of 6.4 (standard deviation (SD) ± 1.0)).Conclusion. Supervised multimodal exercise interventions including aerobic, resistance, and stretching exercises are effective in controlling CRF. These findings suggest that these exercise protocols should be included as a crucial part of the rehabilitation programs for cancer survivors and patients during anticancer treatments.

eHealth and mHealth interventions in the treatment of fatigued cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 1239-1253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annina Seiler ◽  
Vanessa Klaas ◽  
Gerhard Tröster ◽  
Christopher P. Fagundes
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Meta Analysis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document