scholarly journals Improved health-related quality of life, participation, and autonomy in patients with treatment-resistant chronic pain after an intensive social cognitive intervention with the participation of support partners

2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 10 ◽  
pp. 2725-2738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Joseph Jongen ◽  
Rob Ruimschotel ◽  
Yvonne Museler-Kreijns ◽  
Corine Dragstra ◽  
Lotte Duyverman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Social Cognitive ◽  
Cognitive Intervention ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Social Cognitive Intervention

scholarly journals Anxiety Sensitivity and Health-Related Quality of Life in Children With Chronic Pain

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 814-823 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennie C.I. Tsao ◽  
Marcia Meldrum ◽  
Su C. Kim ◽  
Lonnie K. Zeltzer
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Anxiety Sensitivity ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

scholarly journals Pain, Sleep, and Health-Related Quality of Life after Multidisciplinary Intervention for Chronic Pain

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (19) ◽  
pp. 10233
Author(s):  
Hafdís Skúladóttir ◽  
Herdis Sveinsdottir ◽  
Janean E. Holden ◽  
Thóra Jenný Gunnarsdóttir ◽  
Sigridur Halldorsdottir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Sleep Problems ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
One Year

Multidisciplinary pain-management programs have the potential to decrease pain intensity, improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and increase sleep quality. In this longitudinal prospective cohort study, the aim was to investigate the long-term effects of multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation interventions in Iceland. More precisely, we (a) explored and described how individuals with chronic pain evaluated their pain severity, sleep, and HRQOL at pre-treatment and at one-year follow-up and (b) examined what predicted the participants’ one-year follow-up HRQOL. Seventy-nine patients aged 20–68 years, most of whom were women (85%), responded. The participants scored their pain lower at one-year follow-up (p < 0.001). According to their response, most of them had disrupted sleep, mainly because of pain. One year after the treatment, more participants slept through the night (p = 0.004), and their HRQOL increased. Higher pre-treatment mental component summary (MCS) scores and having pursued higher education predicted higher MCS scores at one-year follow-up, and higher pre-treatment physical component summary (PCS) scores predicted higher PCS scores at one-year follow-up. Sleep problems, being a woman, and having children younger than 18 years of age predicted lower MCS scores at one-year follow-up. These findings are suggestive that patients should be examined with respect to their mental status, and it could be beneficial if they received some professional support after completing the intervention.

Guided self-determination in treatment of chronic pain – a randomized, controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Paarup Pickering ◽  
Nina Jeanette Bache ◽  
Stine Estrup
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Patient Activation ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Pain Centre ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Abstract Objectives To test whether Guided Self-Determination (GSD) used in chronic pain management could improve the health-related quality of life, patient activation and sense of coherence (SoC) as a measurement of life skills in patients with chronic pain. The method has been shown to be effective in other chronic conditions, but has not been tested in chronic pain. Methods A three-site randomised, controlled trial at three major multidisciplinary pain centres in Denmark. 200 patients were included and randomised. In the intervention period, both groups had regular visits to the pain centre with both doctors and nurses. The intervention group additionally received the GSD intervention with weekly sessions for eight weeks. Data were collected from February 2013 to July 2016 and consisted of three questionnaires answered before and after the 8-week intervention period, and after six months. The primary outcome was self-reported health related quality of life. Secondary outcomes included self-reported activation and SoC. Results We found no clinically relevant difference between the groups for health-related quality of life, patient activation or SoC at either baseline, at three months or at six months. We also analysed data for trends over time using mixed model analysis, and this did not show any significant differences between groups. Conclusions GSD did not improve health-related quality of life, patient activation or SoC when administered to patients with chronic pain treated in a multidisciplinary pain centre. New research is recommended using a combination of self-reported and objective measures and longer follow-up.

Assessment and treatment at a pain clinic: A one-year follow-up of patients with chronic pain

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 233-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Hållstam ◽  
Monika Löfgren ◽  
Lina Benson ◽  
Christer Svensén ◽  
Britt-Marie Stålnacke
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Clinic ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Pain Clinics ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
One Year

AbstractBackground and aimsPain is one of the most common reasons for patients to seek primary health care. Pain relief is likely to be achieved for patients suffering from acute pain, but for individuals with chronic pain it is more likely that the condition will persist. These patients have the option of being referred to specialised pain clinics. However, the complexity surrounding chronic pain patients is not well studied in these settings. This study aimed to describe patients with chronic pain referred to a pain clinic by using the information submitted during their first visit and one year later and also to identify associations between baseline characteristics and improvements in health-related quality of life in the follow-up.MethodsThis was a longitudinal observational study of a sample consisting of 318 patients referred to a pain clinic. One group of patients containing 271 individuals (median age 48, 64% females) was assessed and received conventional pain treatment (CPT group) and a second group of 47 patients (median age 53, 64% females) was assessed by a pain specialist and referred back to their physician with a treatment recommendation (assessment only, AO group). Patient-reported outcome measures in health-related quality of life (EQ-5D), pain intensity (VAS), mental health (HADS), insomnia (ISI), pain-related disability (PDI), kinesiophobia (TSK) and sense of coherence (SOC) were collected at the first visit and one year later.ResultsAt baseline, the CPT group reported a low EQ-5D Index (median (md) 0.157) and EQVAS (md 40) as well as considerable high, current pain intensity VAS (md 58), HADS anxiety (md 8), ISI (md 17), PDI (md 36) and TSK (md 39). The AO group showed similar problems (no significant differences compared to the CPT group), except for ISI, where the AO group reported less severe problems. At the one-year follow-up, the CPT group had a statistically significant improvement in EQ-5D, VAS, ISI, PDI and TSK. In the AO group no significant changes were observed. In the CPT group there was an association between a high ISI level at baseline and an improved EQ-5D Index in the follow-up.ConclusionsThe study describes rarely explored groups of patients with chronic pain at a pain clinic. Severe pain problems were present in both groups at their first visit. A statistically significant improvement could be seen in the group that was conventionally treated while this was not the case among those subjects who were assessed and referred. The results imply, that relatively limited treatment strategies were helpful for the patients’ health-related quality of life. Despite these improvements, the patients were not fully recovered, pointing to the chronicity of pain conditions and the need of support for many patients.ImplicationsIncreased knowledge about assessment, selection and treatment at pain clinics is important to improve the quality of the work performed at these clinics. Despite limited resources, further efforts should be made to collect comparable, valid data on a regular base from pain clinics in order to develop recommendation models.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document