scholarly journals The Hemarthrosis-Simulating Knee Model: A Useful Tool for Individualized Education in Patients with Hemophilia (GEFACET Study)

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 133-138
Author(s):  
Sophie le Doré ◽  
Nathalie Grinda ◽  
Emmanuelle Ferré ◽  
Valerie Roussel-Robert ◽  
Birgit Frotscher ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Laura S. DeThorne ◽  
Kelly Searsmith

Purpose The purpose of this article is to address some common concerns associated with the neurodiversity paradigm and to offer related implications for service provision to school-age autistic students. In particular, we highlight the need to (a) view first-person autistic perspectives as an integral component of evidence-based practice, (b) use the individualized education plan as a means to actively address environmental contributions to communicative competence, and (c) center intervention around respect for autistic sociality and self-expression. We support these points with cross-disciplinary scholarship and writings from autistic individuals. Conclusions We recognize that school-based speech-language pathologists are bound by institutional constraints, such as eligibility determination and Individualized Education Program processes that are not inherently consistent with the neurodiversity paradigm. Consequently, we offer examples for implementing the neurodiversity paradigm while working within these existing structures. In sum, this article addresses key points of tension related to the neurodiversity paradigm in a way that we hope will directly translate into improved service provision for autistic students. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.13345727


Laws ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Michael Rozalski ◽  
Mitchell L. Yell ◽  
Jacob Warner

In 1975, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (renamed the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in 1990) established the essential obligation of special education law, which is to develop a student’s individualized special education program that enables them to receive a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE was defined in the federal law as special education and related services that: (a) are provided at public expense, (b) meet the standards of the state education agency, (c) include preschool, elementary, or secondary education, and (d) are provided in conformity with a student’s individualized education program (IEP). Thus, the IEP is the blueprint of an individual student’s FAPE. The importance of FAPE has been shown in the number of disputes that have arisen over the issue. In fact 85% to 90% of all special education litigation involves disagreements over the FAPE that students receive. FAPE issues boil down to the process and content of a student’s IEP. In this article, we differentiate procedural (process) and substantive (content) violations and provide specific guidance on how to avoid both process and content errors when drafting and implementing students’ IEPs.


The Knee ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 812-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameh Elguizaoui ◽  
David C. Flanigan ◽  
Joshua D. Harris ◽  
Erin Parsons ◽  
Alan S. Litsky ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. S48-S49
Author(s):  
Y. Tochigi ◽  
T.O. McKinley ◽  
A.D. Heiner ◽  
D.C. Fredericks ◽  
J.A. Bobst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. S213-S214
Author(s):  
Y. Hagiwara ◽  
A. Ando ◽  
Y. Onoda ◽  
E. Chimoto ◽  
K. Hatori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Test ◽  
Christine Mason ◽  
Carolyn Hughes ◽  
Moira Konrad ◽  
Melia Neale ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Norman Harden ◽  
Gila Wallach ◽  
Christine M. Gagnon ◽  
Arzhang Zereshki ◽  
Ai Mukai ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document