scholarly journals Adherence to Inhaled Therapy in Patients with COPD Associated to Pneumoconiosis

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 16 ◽  
pp. 2697-2706
Author(s):  
Yating Peng ◽  
Jia-xi Duan ◽  
Xin Li ◽  
Yuqin Zeng ◽  
Zijing Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoko Azuma ◽  
Atsushi Sano ◽  
Takashi Sakai ◽  
Satoshi Koezuka ◽  
Hajime Otsuka ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an important risk factor for postoperative complications and mortality. To determine the effects of perioperative combination therapy, using a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and a long-acting β2 agonist (LABA), on preoperative lung function, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and long-term outcome in COPD patients. Methods Between January 2005 and October 2019, 130 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed COPD underwent surgery for lung cancer. We conducted a retrospective review of their medical record to evaluate that LAMA/LABA might be an optimal regimen for patients with COPD undergoing surgery for lung cancer. All patients were received perioperative rehabilitation and divided into 3 groups according to the type of perioperative inhaled therapy and management: LAMA/LABA (n = 64), LAMA (n = 23) and rehabilitation only (no bronchodilator) (n = 43). We conducted a retrospective review of their medical records. Results Patients who received preoperative LAMA/LABA therapy showed significant improvement in lung function before surgery (p < 0.001 for both forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1%pred). Compared with patients who received preoperative LAMA therapy, patients with LAMA/LABA therapy had significantly improved lung function (ΔFEV1, LAMA/LABA 223.1 mL vs. LAMA 130.0 mL, ΔFEV1%pred, LAMA/LABA 10.8% vs. LAMA 6.8%; both p < 0.05). Postoperative complications were lower frequent in the LAMA/LABA group than in the LAMA group (p = 0.007). In patients with moderate to severe air flow limitation (n = 61), those who received LAMA/LABA therapy had significantly longer overall survival and disease-free survival compared with the LAMA (p = 0.049, p = 0.026) and rehabilitation-only groups (p = 0.001, p < 0.001). Perioperative LAMA/LABA therapy was also associated with lower recurrence rates (vs. LAMA p = 0.006, vs. rehabilitation-only p = 0.008). Conclusions We believe this treatment combination is optimal for patients with lung cancer and COPD.


2021 ◽  
pp. 114066
Author(s):  
Yuncheng Wang ◽  
Rachel Yoon Kyung Chang ◽  
Warwick J Britton ◽  
Hak-Kim Chan

Author(s):  
Fabiano Di Marco ◽  
Pierachille Santus ◽  
Silvia Terraneo ◽  
Elena Peruzzi ◽  
Elisa Muscianisi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Humenberger ◽  
Andreas Horner ◽  
Anna Labek ◽  
Bernhard Kaiser ◽  
Rupert Frechinger ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
pp. 102-106
Author(s):  
A. R. Tatarsky ◽  
E. V. Sukhanova ◽  
E. V. Bobkov ◽  
A. B. Kiryukhin

The study was aimed to investigate the efficiency of long-term combined inhaled therapy with ipratropium bromide and ambroxol via compressor pneumatic nebulizer in 86 COPD patients. Significant improvement in clinical status, physical tolerance and cell content (macrophages, neutrophils) of induced sputum was revealed in all the patients in comparison with a control group. Mild to moderate COPD patients had considerable improvement in FEV1. The authors concluded that the proposed treatment had resulted in the positive effects.


2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 561-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi Sucharew ◽  
Christopher H. Goss ◽  
Steven P. Millard ◽  
Bonnie W. Ramsey

2021 ◽  
pp. 2102106
Author(s):  
Ashley Woodcock ◽  
Kai M. Beeh ◽  
Hironori Sagara ◽  
Simon Aumônier ◽  
Emmanuel Addo-Yobo ◽  
...  

When selecting the best inhaler and drug combination for a patient with respiratory disease, a number of factors should be considered. While efficacy and safety of medical treatments are always a priority, in recent years the environmental impacts of all aspects of life have become an increasingly necessary consideration and inhaled therapies are no exception. The carbon footprint of an item, individual, or organisation, is one of the most important and quantifiable environmental impacts, assessed by the amount of greenhouse gases (often expressed in terms of CO2 equivalents) generated throughout the life cycle. The two most commonly prescribed and manufactured inhaler types worldwide are pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) containing hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) propellants and dry powder inhalers (DPIs). Most of the carbon footprint of current pMDIs is a result of the propellants that they contain (HFC-134a and HFC-227ea, which are potent greenhouse gases). In comparison, the powder in DPIs is dispersed by the patient's own inhalation, meaning DPIs do not contain a propellant and have a lower carbon footprint than most pMDIs currently available. Soft mist inhalers are another propellant-free option: the device contains a spring, which provides the energy to disperse the aqueous medication. In this review, we will examine the published data on carbon footprint data for inhalers, providing an analysis of potential implications for treatment decision making and industry initiatives.


Author(s):  
Grainne D'Ancona ◽  
Andrew Cumella ◽  
Charlotte Renwick ◽  
Samantha Walker
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Beverley Bostock-Cox
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document