Vaginal drug administration in the hospital setting

2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
José das Neves ◽  
Bárbara Santos ◽  
Branca Teixeira ◽  
Gustavo Dias ◽  
Teresa Cunha ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marios Charalambous ◽  
Holger A. Volk ◽  
Luc Van Ham ◽  
Sofie F. M. Bhatti

AbstractStatus epilepticus (SE) or prolonged epileptic seizure activity is a common neurological emergency with a high mortality rate and, if left untreated, can lead to irreversible cerebral damage and systemic complications. Fast and effective first-line management is of paramount importance, particularly in the at-home management of seizures where drug administration routes are limited. Benzodiazepines (BZDs) have been exclusively used in veterinary medicine for decades as first-line drugs based on their high potency and rapid onset of action. Various administration routes exist in dogs, such as oral, intravenous, intramuscular, rectal, and intranasal, all with different advantages and limitations. Recently, intranasal drug delivery has become more popular due to its unique and favourable characteristics, providing potential advantages over other routes of drug administration in the management of canine SE. This narrative review provides an outline of the management of SE at home and in a hospital setting, discusses considerations and challenges of the various routes of BZD administration, and evaluates the impact of intranasal drug administration (nose-brain pathway) for controlling canine SE at home and within hospital settings.


1964 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 352-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. D. Wright ◽  
P. G. Lynes

1) Thirty-five long-term chronic female mental hospital patients were selected on the basis of their relatively stable pharmacotherapeutic and behavioural histories, and gradually switched from active medications to placebos. Following a variable time on placebo, those whose behaviour had not significantly changed were then taken off pills altogether. The purposes and true nature of this procedure were effectively obscured from staff and patients alike. 2) It was discovered that only a minority of patients objectively required the maintenance medication which all had been receiving; a larger number did require active psychotropic drugs from time to time; and just over half showed no significant requirement for pharmacotherapy at any time during an eight-month period. 3) It was inferred from these results that the medication practices in this particular (but not atypical) mental hospital setting were more relevant to the traditions of pharmacotherapy and to nursing staff morale, than to the objective psychiatric requirements of the patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1944-1955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Schwarz ◽  
Elizabeth C. Ward ◽  
Petrea Cornwell ◽  
Anne Coccetti ◽  
Pamela D'Netto ◽  
...  

Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine (a) the agreement between allied health assistants (AHAs) and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) when completing dysphagia screening for low-risk referrals and at-risk patients under a delegation model and (b) the operational impact of this delegation model. Method All AHAs worked in the adult acute inpatient settings across three hospitals and completed training and competency evaluation prior to conducting independent screening. Screening (pass/fail) was based on results from pre-screening exclusionary questions in combination with a water swallow test and the Eating Assessment Tool. To examine the agreement of AHAs' decision making with SLPs, AHAs ( n = 7) and SLPs ( n = 8) conducted an independent, simultaneous dysphagia screening on 51 adult inpatients classified as low-risk/at-risk referrals. To examine operational impact, AHAs independently completed screening on 48 low-risk/at-risk patients, with subsequent clinical swallow evaluation conducted by an SLP with patients who failed screening. Results Exact agreement between AHAs and SLPs on overall pass/fail screening criteria for the first 51 patients was 100%. Exact agreement for the two tools was 100% for the Eating Assessment Tool and 96% for the water swallow test. In the operational impact phase ( n = 48), 58% of patients failed AHA screening, with only 10% false positives on subjective SLP assessment and nil identified false negatives. Conclusion AHAs demonstrated the ability to reliably conduct dysphagia screening on a cohort of low-risk patients, with a low rate of false negatives. Data support high level of agreement and positive operational impact of using trained AHAs to perform dysphagia screening in low-risk patients.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 129-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Poskus

Abstract The bedside swallow screen has become an essential part of the evaluation of a patient after stroke in the hospital setting. Implementing this type of tool should be simple. However, reinforcement and monitoring of the tool presents a challenge. Verifying the consistency and reliability of nurses performing the bedside swallow screen can be a difficult task. This article will document the journey of implementing and maintaining a reliable and valid nursing bedside swallow screen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document