Real Estate Market Developments and Financial Sector Soundness

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Hilbers ◽  
Qin Lei ◽  
Lisbeth Stausholm Zacho
Equilibrium ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 711-740
Author(s):  
Maryna Brychko ◽  
Tetyana Vasilyeva ◽  
Zuzana Rowland ◽  
Serhiy Lyeonov

Research background: Based on the history of financial crises, real estate market behavior could be thought of as a key benchmark of trust shifts in the financial sector of the economy. Plunging real estate asset prices accompanied by the financial "bubbles" explosion could be viewed as the harbinger ? even the cause ? of the public trust crash in the financial sector. Purpose of the article: This study intends to assess the extent to which the real estate market behavior determinants, along with financial sector consumers' feelings, are able to predict trust crises in the financial sector, namely to its primary institutions ? European Central Bank and the Euro. Methods: In order to estimate the probability of a trust crisis in the financial sector, two logistic regression logit models were developed based on two types of dependent variables as they reflect trust violations in the financial system primary institutions ? net trust in European Central Bank (Model I) and net support for the Euro (Model II). The research was conducted on quarterly panel data of the EU countries from the euro area covering the period from 2000 to 2019. Logit regressions employed for data processing and analysis were performed in the computational system STATISTICA. Findings & value added: The logit-modeling results show that determinants of irrational real estate buyers' behavior are powerless in predicting the escalation of the trust crisis in the Euro. However, binary models of real estate market behavior could be successfully used to predict the probability of the trust crisis in the European Central Bank. The results show that real house price indices, price to income ratio, price to rent ratio, and rent prices accompanied by the financial sector consumers' feelings are statistically significant, providing the best distribution between the normal times and periods of trust crisis in the European Central Bank. Irrational real estate market behavior may indicate serious problems in the trust violations in the European Central Bank, and it should be a signal for policymakers to take actions towards more efficient financial and real estate market regulation following the behavioral approach.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 236
Author(s):  
José A. Carrasco-Gallego

The influence of real estate on finance and the whole economy has captured significant attention, especially since the aftermath of the Great Recession, because of the potential of this sector to destabilize markets. This paper explores the other way around: housing markets’ capacity to stabilize the economy through different macroprudential policies facing several types of shocks to achieve financial stability as a driver of sustainability. Specifically, a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model is used to evaluate the effectiveness to stabilize the economy of different macroprudential tools based on the loan-to-value ratio for real estate, on the countercyclical capital buffer for the financial sector and a combination of both tools, facing a housing price shock, a technology shock and a financial shock. The model presents three types of agents (borrowers, entrepreneurs and banks) in an economy with a real estate market, a financial sector, a labor market and a production sector. The government can use different macroprudential policies to stabilize the economy, leaning against the wind of several shocks to achieve economic and financial sustainability. The assessment of the effectiveness of each policy shows that, in the case of a housing sector shock and a technology shock, the more effective policy is the one based on a countercyclical rule on the loan-to-value ratio for the real estate sector as a macroprudential tool. Furthermore, with a house price shock, if the macroprudential authority applies a macroprudential policy based on the countercyclical capital buffer, the shock may be exacerbated. Additionally, when there is a financial shock, the macroprudential authority may face a trade-off between several macro-financial policies depending on its objective. Therefore, it is not recommendable to automatically apply a macroprudential policy without a meticulous analysis of the nature of the shock that the economy is experimenting with and how different policies can stabilize or destabilize the different markets and, therefore, reach higher or lower sustainability.


Author(s):  
Gabriel Moss QC ◽  
Bob Wessels ◽  
Matthias Haentjens

The consequences of the international financial crisis that started in 2007 unveiled a real estate bubble crisis in Spain that left the majority of its financial sector on the verge of insolvency. National financial institutions had been financing the over-development of the real estate market for years, borrowing abroad to lend locally at an unsustainable pace. The moment the international interbank market dried up, Spanish financial entities were unable to refinance their debts and stopped financing the development and retail acquisition of housing. This happened at a time when the international sovereign context was extremely troublesome. Greece, Portugal, and Ireland were undergoing a rescue process, and Spain and Italy started experiencing a sharp rise in the spread of their bonds vis-à-vis the German Bundesbond. Spain’s debt-to-GDP ratio then was still low (considerably lower than that of Germany, France, or the UK), and yet the cost of financing was soaring, threating the very solvency of the nation. The reason for this threat was the over-indebtedness of the private sector, with special intensity in the case of the financial sector. The Spanish government realized that a recapitalization of the troubled financial entities was a precondition of its own survival.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 380-386
Author(s):  
Jan Veuger ◽  

The 34th annual congress of April 10-14 this year took place in Bonita Springs (Florida) where the professionals in real-estate education and research discussed six themes: global economy and capital flows, real estate market cycles, demographic effects, future-proof real estate, disruption in technology and future educational models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document