scholarly journals Price Discrimination Under Ec Competition Law: Another Antitrust Theory in Search of Limiting Principles

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien Geradin ◽  
Nicolas Petit
Keyword(s):  
Price Discrimination ◽  
Competition Law ◽  
Ec Competition Law

A Solution to the Problems? Regulation 1/2003 and the modernization of competition procedure

2003 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Montag ◽  
Andreas Rosenfeld
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Competition Law ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Radical Reform ◽  
Competition Law Enforcement ◽  
Ec Competition Law

Abstract On 16th December 2002 the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003 on the implementation of rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty. This Regulation will not only replace the 40-year-old Regulation 17/ 62 but constitutes a radical reform of EC competition law enforcement. The purpose of this article is to analyse the basic principles of the new Regulation and the implications for current and future competition proceedings.

EC Competition Law 1999-2000

2001 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 365-529
Author(s):  
I. S. Forrester ◽  
J. F. MacLennan
Keyword(s):  
Competition Law ◽  
Ec Competition Law

Economic analysis of the firm’s boundaries and the limits of competition: The case of Nord Stream 2 AG

2021 ◽  
pp. 134-151
Author(s):  
S. B. Avdasheva ◽  
G. F. Yusupova
Keyword(s):  
Price Discrimination ◽  
Joint Venture ◽  
Competition Law ◽  
Competition Authority ◽  
Gas Market ◽  
Infrastructure Investments ◽  
Nord Stream ◽  
Economic Concentration ◽  
Legal Concepts ◽  
Available Information

Using publicly available information, the article examines the economic concepts, which underlie the arguments of the decision of Polish competition authority UOKiK in relation to the participants of the Nord Stream 2. It explains the interrelation between economic and legal concepts, which are to be applied to interpret the competitive impact of joint venture and probable theory of harm for infrastructure investments under competition law of European Union, including in comparison with Russian competition law. It has been demonstrated that the resolution of a consortium case should be based on the proof of two statements. The first statement implies that the joint venture is a firm (and therefore the creation of a joint venture is a deal leading to economic concentration). The second statement means that despite Gazprom adopted the commitments about decision of the European Commission and trends in the development of the European gas market, the possibility of price discrimination is retained. Discussion and contestation of the decision against PJSC Gazprom testify in favor of maintaining the relevance of institutional studies and studies of industry markets for resolving legal disputes arising from the application of competition law.

scholarly journals The Concept of Dominance in EC Competition Law

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien Geradin ◽  
Nicolas Petit ◽  
Mike Walker ◽  
Paul Hofer ◽  
Frédéric Louis
Keyword(s):  
Competition Law ◽  
Ec Competition Law
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document