scholarly journals Low Cost Carrier Growth in the U.S. Airline Industry: Past, Present, and Future

Author(s):  
Harumi Ito ◽  
Darin Lee
Author(s):  
Recai Aydin ◽  
Roger Morefield

<p class="MsoBodyText" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; mso-pagination: none;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of the continuing trend in the U.S. Airline industry away from hub-and-spoke (network) airlines and toward low-cost airlines. The model of this study examines the level of success which the network carriers may experience by using market segmentation and price discrimination to sustain profitability in the face of the growth in market share held by low-cost carrier airlines. </span></span></p>


Subject Europe's airline industry. Significance Despite good performance over the past year, the underlying condition of the European airline industry has not changed. Major carriers are still facing competitive challenges from long-haul airlines based in the Gulf, especially Emirates, Qatar Airways and Etihad Airways, and from the European low-cost carrier (LCC) sector. Impacts The fallout from recent terrorist attacks could hit the industry's fragile recovery. Labour unrest in France will affect Air France, as its pilots voted on May 30 to go on strike over pay conditions. A UK exit from the EU would force its airlines, some of the most efficient in Europe, to reconsider the focus of their operations. New opportunities may arise from the Commission's efforts to negotiate aviation agreements with such countries as Brazil as well as ASEAN.


Subject Outlook for US investigations into airlines collusion. Significance Three carriers, United, American Airlines and Delta, account for 80% of US domestic air travel; Southwest, the leading low cost carrier (LCC) takes much of the remainder. The Department of Justice (DoJ) and the Department of Transportation (DoT) have both launched major investigations into the pricing practices of the airlines. Both regulatory moves imply that the rationalisation of the US airline industry has left passengers vulnerable to predatory behaviour, which would worsen if the US market were further closed to foreign competition. Impacts Low oil prices may provide a long-term boost to profits if airlines move to lock in new hedges. However, manufacturers will be hit hard by an economic slowdown in China, home of two of the largest airlines by fleet size. Increasing wages elsewhere in the US economy will add further pressure to airline labour costs.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Terence P.C. Fan

Subject area Strategic management and marketing. Study level/applicability Executive education; postgraduate; undergraduate. Case overview By 2004, the low-cost carrier model had just recently been introduced to Southeast Asia. Airlines under this model quickly began taking market share. Singapore's first budget carrier, Valuair, finds itself in fierce competition between two rapidly emerging competitors in the second half of 2004. Valuair needs to expand in order to remain competitive. However, for this to happen the company needs additional access to capital. The CEO, Sim Kay Wee, has begun pitching to investors that his company is a smart low-risk investment. Is Sim right, given Valuair's competitive position and the market environment in which it operates? Expected learning outcomes Students will be able to apply strategic frameworks in order to develop an understanding of Valuair's market position and use this understanding to advice investment decisions. Supplementary materials Teaching notes are available for educators only. Please contact your library to gain login details or e-mail [email protected] to request teaching notes.


2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denton L. Collins ◽  
Francisco J. Román ◽  
Hung C. (“Leon”) Chan

ABSTRACT This paper examines the influence of a firm's business model on the relative persistence of profitability in the U.S. airline industry. The strategic management literature describes a firm's business model as reflecting how that firm chooses to compete in the marketplace. Given this linkage between business model, competition, and the marketplace, we conjecture that the persistence of profit margin and asset turnover ratios will be influenced by firms' choices of business model. Further, we hypothesize that this choice of business model influences the relative persistence of the individual revenue and expense components of current profit margin and asset turnover ratios for future profitability ratios. We test these conjectures by (1) partitioning our sample firms according to business model (network carriers versus low-cost carriers), and (2) decomposing sample firms' profit margin and asset turnover ratios into components relating to pricing policy, input cost control, and productivity. We find that the profit margin and asset turnover ratios of network carriers tend to be more persistent than those of low-cost carriers, and that this differential persistence is reflected in the associations between current revenue and expense components, and future profit margin and asset turnover ratios.


2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Bogdan Daraban

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p style="margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; text-align: justify; mso-pagination: none; tab-stops: 6.0in; mso-layout-grid-align: none;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt; mso-themecolor: text1; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin;">Over the past twenty years the US airline industry has been marked by the intense competition between the Low-Cost Carriers (LCCs) and the Full-Service Carrier (FSCs). The fundamental differences between the two business models are reflected in considerable cost advantages of the LCCs. In this paper, I use a set of model specific metrics to investigate whether the competitive process has led to convergence in some of the key features of the competing models. I conclude that despite some evidence of convergence along certain dimensions, the LCCs </span><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt; mso-themecolor: text1;">are not ready to abandon the core LCC model.</span><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt; mso-themecolor: text1; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-font-style: italic; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin;"></span></span></p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document