scholarly journals Metropolitan Fragmentation, Law Enforcement Effort and Urban Crime

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C. Wheaton
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Urban Crime ◽  
Enforcement Effort ◽  
Metropolitan Fragmentation

Personalized crime location prediction

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 422-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
MOHAMMAD A. TAYEBI ◽  
UWE GLÄSSER ◽  
MARTIN ESTER ◽  
PATRICIA L. BRANTINGHAM
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Urban Crime ◽  
Crime Analysis ◽  
Urban Landscapes ◽  
Location Prediction ◽  
Prevention Strategies ◽  
Pattern Theory ◽  
Activity Spaces ◽  
Crime Pattern Theory ◽  
Crime Pattern

Crime reduction and prevention strategies are vital for policymakers and law enforcement to face inevitable increases in urban crime rates as a side effect of the projected growth of urban population by the year 2030. Studies conclude that crime does not occur uniformly across urban landscapes but concentrates in certain areas. This phenomenon has drawn attention to spatial crime analysis, primarily focusing on crime hotspots, areas with disproportionally higher crime density. In this paper, we present CrimeTracer1, a personalized random walk-based approach to spatial crime analysis and crime location prediction outside of hotspots. We propose a probabilistic model of spatial behaviour of known offenders within their activity spaces. Crime Pattern Theory concludes that offenders, rather than venture into unknown territory, frequently select targets in or near places they are most familiar with as part of their activity space. Our experiments on a large real-world crime dataset show that CrimeTracer outperforms all other methods used for location recommendation we evaluate here.

The Application of Uncitral Model Law Principles in the Middle East Region

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Abu Sadah ◽  
Simon Norton
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Middle East ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Enforcement Effort ◽  
East Region ◽  
Model Law ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Middle East Region

AbstractThis article presents an empirical analysis of the impact of the enforcement of substantive UNCITRAL Model Law principles in the Middle East region. Despite the main differences in the schools of thought and jurisdictions in the Middle East, the major conclusion is that UNCITRAL principles are applicable. As compared with data taken from legislations and case law after adopting the UNCITRAL Model Law, in an extension of the analysis, findings show a marginally significant change and deviations from the basic principles of the Model Law in these countries. Analysis of the implications of these changes from the perspective of the role played by the Model Law, shows that there was significant theoretical and practical negative impact upon the overall objectives of the law enforcement effort.

KONTRADIKSI ANTARA KEWAJIBAN ANAK KEPADA ORANGTUA DENGAN ANAK MENGGUGAT ORANGTUA

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 283
Author(s):  
Riska Andista Indriyani ◽  
Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi Nugraheni
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Descriptive Data ◽  
Causal Factors ◽  
Enforcement Effort ◽  
The Family

<p>Abstract</p><p>This article explains the problem, firstly about the causal factors cause of the child sues the parent. Secondly, regarding law enforcement efforts against Article 46 of Law Number 1 Year 1974 on Mariage to prevent children from suing parents. This research is normative legal research is descriptive. The type of data used is secondary data, data collection techniques used is literature study, further technical analysis used is the nature of descriptive data analysis. The results of the research indicate that the factors causing the child to sue the parent is the existence of problems in the family and the provisions of the Article related to the obligation of the child to the parents has not provided assertiveness that the child who sues the parent is a violation of these provisions. The law enforcement effort against Article 46 of Law Number 1 Year 1974 regarding Marriage to prevent children from suing parents is done by settling family problems through deliberation  or through mediation and formulation of continued legal policy as the elaboration of such provisions.</p><p>Keywords: Sues Paren; Child Obligation; Law Enforcement.</p><p> </p><p>Abstrak</p><p>Artikel ini menjelaskan permasalahan, pertama tentang faktor penyebab anak menggugat orangtua. Kedua, tentang upaya penegakan hukum terhadap Pasal 46 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan untuk mencegah anak menggugat orangtua. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif bersifat deskriptif. Jenis data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder, teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan, selanjutnya teknis analisis yang digunakan adalah sifat analisis data deskriptif. Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa faktor penyebab anak menggugat orangtua adalah adanya permasalahan dalam keluarga dan ketentuan pasal terkait kewajiban anak  kepada orangtua belum memberikan ketegasan bahwa anak yang menggugat orangtua merupakan pelanggaran terhadap ketentuan tersebut. Upaya penegakan hukum terhadap Pasal 46 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan untuk mencegah anak menggugat orangtua dilakukan dengan penyelesaian permasalahan keluarga melalui musyawarah atau melalui mediasi dan perumusan kebijakan hukum lanjutan sebagai penjabaran ketentuan tersebut.</p><p>Kata kunci: Menggugat Orangtua; Kewajiban Anak; Penegakan Hukum.</p>

scholarly journals The advantage of focusing law enforcement effort

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrik Lando ◽  
Steven Shavell
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Enforcement Effort

scholarly journals LITIGATION TRANSFORMATION IN LAW ENFORCEMENT EFFORT IN INDONESIA DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-21
Author(s):  
Dian Ratu Ayu Uswatun Khasanah ◽  
Madiha Dzakiyyah Chairunnisa
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Distance ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
The United States ◽  
New Normal ◽  
Enforcement Effort ◽  
The World ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Primary Materials

The Covid 19 pandemic has accelerated digitization in all aspects of life. As an effort to deal with its spread, the legal realm has also undergone a transformation. The implementation of remote litigations during the Covid-19 pandemic has begun to take effect in line with the government's appeal for Physical/ Social distance. The litigations used the support of the internet network or known as e-litigation. It is nothing new in the world because previously developed countries, such as the United States, have used this method beforehand. The implementation of e-litigation in Indonesia is certainly different from other developed countries that are technologically ready. The implementation of e-litigation is a development of the previously implemented e-court program. This study examined the ins and outs of virtual litigations during the pandemic with all the regulations that assist them. The research used normative and empirical juridical methods that provide explanations so that it can be used as an evaluation of implementation during the pandemic period and towards the new normal era. The secondary data were taken from the primary materials from the regulations that apply during the pandemic and the new normal era. In addition, the secondary materials used were also from journals, books, and other literacy sources. The results of this paper can be used as a reference for further research on the transformation of law enforcement that puts forward the modernization of technology and information in fulfilling justice and social welfare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document