scholarly journals Deceptive Communication

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Despoina Alempaki ◽  
Valeria Burdea ◽  
Daniel Read
Keyword(s):  
Deceptive Communication

DETECTING DECEPTIVE COMMUNICATION FROM VERBAL, VISUAL, AND PARALINGUISTIC CUES1

1979 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN E. HOCKING ◽  
EDMUND P. KAMINSKI ◽  
JOYCE BAUCHNER ◽  
GERALD R. MILLER
Keyword(s):  
Deceptive Communication

Patterns of Deceptive Communication of Social and Religious Issues in Social Media

2019 ◽  
pp. 490-502
Author(s):  
Poothullil Mathew Martin ◽  
Jerry Joseph Onampally
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Religious Community ◽  
Visual Images ◽  
Fake News ◽  
Digital Space ◽  
Religious Issues ◽  
Religious Communication ◽  
Technological Tools ◽  
Deceptive Communication ◽  
Rational Players

Deception and religion have evolved over the years. Deception and belief manipulation are aspects of religious communication. The digital space revolves around fake news and indicates that humans are more susceptible than ever to mental manipulation by powerful technological tools. This chapter demonstrates patterns in deceptive narrative usage in a communication of social and religious issues (CSRI) in social media among a religious community in Mumbai. Drawing from deception theory of David Ettingery and Philippe Jehiel, the exploitation by rational players of the fundamental attribution of error (FAE) made by other players, where FAE allows for belief manipulation. The authors propose that an increased presence of social media promotes patterns in CSRI in social media. The analysis depicted patterns in the preference to the use of text visual images, audio-visual, and audio formats when communicating social and religious issues.

The Role of Deceptive Communication and Gender in Shaping Online Dating Interactions

2019 ◽  
pp. 460-474
Author(s):  
Anna Maria Kuzio
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
General Population ◽  
Online Dating ◽  
Significant Others ◽  
Online Environment ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Deceptive Communication

Online dating is becoming an increasingly used method for meeting significant others. As the research of lying behavior has advanced so has the technique of detecting the act of lying, especially in the online environment where deception is more likely to happen. The aim of this chapter is to simplify the perception of lying behavior to the general population and examine gender differences of lying behavior, namely, to verify whether one can observe a statistically significant difference in the speech behavior and exploitation of lying cues among men and women. The study shows correlation between gender and deception in online environment.

The cost of threat displays and the stability of deceptive communication

1995 ◽  
Vol 175 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eldridge S. Adams ◽  
Michael Mesterton-Gibbons
Keyword(s):  
Threat Displays ◽  
The Stability ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Deceptive Communication

Risk of HIV Transmission in Sexual Behaviors of College Students

1995 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 787-799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Simkins
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Sexual Behaviors ◽  
Hiv Transmission ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Unprotected Sex ◽  
Minimal Risk ◽  
Sex Partners ◽  
Multiple Sex Partners ◽  
Married Students ◽  
Deceptive Communication

The purpose of this study was to investigate the sexual behaviors of college students and assess the extent to which they were engaging in behaviors that have a risk for contracting AIDS. A total of 132 single sexually active students and 58 married students responded to a survey on their sexual behaviors and attitudes. Risk behaviors such as engaging in unprotected sex, having multiple sex partners, practicing anal sex, alcohol use, and infidelity and deceptive communication with partner were examined. Compared with earlier surveys on the same population, there was an increase in concern about contracting AIDS and a significant increase in the percentage of students who took the AIDS antibody test. Although none indicated they would lie to partners about a seropositive AIDS test, a few would not tell their partner unless specifically asked. A small percentage of subjects would have extradyadic relations without informing their steady partners and a small number of respondents indicated they might continue to engage in sexual relations with a seropositive partner or a new partner who recently had a seronegative AIDS test. The risks most predominant in this sample were the practice of unprotected sex, having multiple sex partners, and the consumption of alcohol in conjunction with sexual activity. With the exception of unprotected intercourse, the majority of respondents were engaging in behaviors that pose a minimal risk for contracting AIDS.

When the truth is painful. Perceived harm in truth telling affects choosing prosocial lying over truth telling

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Cantarero ◽  
Katarzyna Byrka ◽  
Aleksandra Kosiarczyk ◽  
Dariusz Dolinski
Keyword(s):  
Truth Telling ◽  
Behavioral Measures ◽  
Deceptive Communication ◽  
Perceived Harm

In this article we focus on the dilemma between honesty and care that people often experience. We argue that people in general prefer a prosocial lie to blatant truth when the former is more useful to the recipient. When there is no chance for improvement, or it is not being sought, a prosocial lie is chosen and perceived harmfulness of truth telling mediates the effect. In Study 1 we show that individuals prefer prosocial lies and that this preference interacts with evaluations of truthful and deceptive communication. Results of Study 2a showed that manipulation of information usefulness affects choices between prosocial lying and truth telling. When the unbeneficial features of a person are more permanent, a prosocial lie is strongly preferred (Study 2b). Importantly, when own interest is in conflict with the useful truth, the latter is no longer preferred (Study 3). In Study 4a and Study 5 we additionally employed behavioral measures to test the robustness of the effect.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document