scholarly journals Service-Led or Service-Biased Growth? Equilibrium Development Accounting Across Indian Districts

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianyu Fan ◽  
Michael Peters ◽  
Fabrizio Zilibotti
Keyword(s):  
Development Accounting ◽  
Growth Equilibrium

scholarly journals Measuring Total Factor Productivity: Accounting for cross country differences in income per capita // Мјерење укупне факторске продуктивности: обрачун међудржавних разлика у БДП-у по раднику

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (19) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Stevo Pucar ◽  
Zoran Borovic
Keyword(s):  
Total Factor Productivity ◽  
Factor Productivity ◽  
Productivity Measurement ◽  
Production Factors ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Development Accounting ◽  
Proximate Determinants ◽  
Country Differences ◽  
Cross Country ◽  
The Cross

Summary: Why are some countries so much richer than others? Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Influential works by Klenow & Rodriguez-Clare (1997), Hall and Jones (1999), and Parente & Prescott (2000), among others, have argued that most of the cross country differences in output per worker is explained by differences in total factor productivity. Total factor productivity measurement enables researchers to determine the contribution of supply-side production factors to economic growth. Development Accounting is a first-pass attempt at organizing the answer around two proximate determinants: factors of production and efficiency. It answers the question “how much of the cross-country income variance can be attributed to differences in (physical and human) capital, and how much to differences in the efficiency with which capital is used’’?In this article, we will outline framework for growth accounting to account for cross-country difference in income of Republic of Srpska, Republic of Croatia and Republic of Serbia. The current consensus is that differences in income per worker across countries do not arise primarly from differences in quantities in capital or labour, but rather from differences in efficiency with which are these factors used. We find that total factor productivity is very important for the growth of output per worker, but only in cases of Serbia and Croatia. In case of Srpska the most important factor for the growth of output per worker is growth of capital.Резиме: Зашто су неке земље толико богатије од других? Зашто неке земље остварују много већи обим производње по раднику од других? Утицајни радови Klenow и Rodriguez-Clare (1997), Hall и Jones (1999), и Parente и Prescott (2000), између осталих, тврдили су да је највећи број међудржавних разлика у обиму производње по раднику резултат разлика у Укупној Факторској Продуктивности. Мјерење Укупне Факторске Продуктивности омогућава истраживачима да утврде допринос фактора на страни понуде привредном расту. Развој ‘’рачуноводства раста’’ представља први покушаја анализирања двије сродне детерминанте раста: фактори производње и ефикасности.  Ова анализа даје одговор на питање “колико су међудржавне разлике у оствареном БДП-у резултат међудржавних разлика у (физичком и људском) капиталу, а колико су резултат разлика у ефикасности којом се капитал користи’’?У овом раду ћемо приказати оквир за “рачуноводство раста’’ који ће се примјенити за обрачун међудржавних разлика у БДП-у по раднику за Републику Српску, Републику Хрватску и Републику Србију. Тренутни консензус међу ауторима је да разлике у БДП-у по раднику између земаља не настају првенствено због разлика у количинама капитала или рада, него због разлика у ефикасности са којом се ови фактори користе. Анализом смо дошли до закључка да је Укупна Факторска Продуктивност веома важна за раст производње по раднику, али само у случајевима Србије и Хрватске. У случају Српске најважнији фактор за раст производње по раднику је раст техничко-технолошке опремљености рада капиталом.

scholarly journals Development accounting with intermediate goods

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Grobovšek
Keyword(s):  
Labor Productivity ◽  
Service Industries ◽  
The Other ◽  
Intermediate Goods ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Final Output ◽  
Development Accounting ◽  
The One ◽  
Intermediate Output

Abstract I use a simple development accounting framework that distinguishes between goods and service industries on the one hand, and final and intermediate output on the other hand, to document the following facts. First, poorer countries are particularly inefficient in the production of intermediate relative to final output. Second, they are not necessarily inefficient in goods relative to service industries. Third, they present low measured labor productivity in goods industries because these are intensive intermediate users, and because their intermediate TFP is relatively low. Fourth, the elasticity of aggregate GDP with respect to sector-neutral TFP is large.

Is Emigration Harmful to Those Left Behind?

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 367-388
Author(s):  
Frédéric Docquier ◽  
Stefanija Veljanoska
Keyword(s):  
Low Income ◽  
Capital Accumulation ◽  
Relative Strength ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
Empirical Literature ◽  
Net Income ◽  
Diffusion Of Technology ◽  
Left Behind ◽  
Development Accounting ◽  
Parameter Values

From the perspective of sending countries, international migrants are positively selected in terms of schooling, particularly in low-income countries. While emigration affects human capital accumulation, it also induces positive spin-offs in the form of remittances, incentives to acquire education, and diffusion of technology and democratic ideas. The net income implications for those left behind are uncertain. This article reviews the main transmission channels investigated in the existing literature and uses a standard development accounting framework to provide estimates of their relative strength and of their combined effect. Although skill biased, emigration increases the disposable income of those left behind in no fewer than three-quarters of the countries of the world. This result is robust to variations in the set of parameter values within a reasonable spectrum established in the empirical literature.

scholarly journals Structural Development Accounting

2013 ◽  
pp. 373-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gino Gancia ◽  
Andreas Müller ◽  
Fabrizio Zilibotti
Keyword(s):  
Structural Development ◽  
Development Accounting
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document