scholarly journals International Transfers of Health Research Data Following Schrems II: A Problem in Need of a Solution

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dara Hallinan ◽  
Alexander Bernier ◽  
Anne Cambon-Thomsen ◽  
Francis P. Crawley ◽  
Diana Dimitrova ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Phaik Yeong Cheah ◽  
Nattapat Jatupornpimol ◽  
Borimas Hanboonkunupakarn ◽  
Napat Khirikoekkong ◽  
Podjanee Jittamala ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carsten Schmidt ◽  
Stephan Struckmann ◽  
Cornelia Enzenbach ◽  
Achim Reineke ◽  
Jürgen Stausberg ◽  
...  

Abstract Background No standards exist for the handling and reporting of data quality in health research. This work introduces a data quality framework for observational health research data collections with supporting software implementations to facilitate harmonized data quality assessments. Methods Developments were guided by the evaluation of an existing data quality framework and literature reviews. Functions for the computation of data quality indicators were written in R. The concept and implementations are illustrated based on data from the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP).Results The data quality framework comprises 34 data quality indicators. These target three aspects of data quality: compliance with pre-specified structural and technical requirements (Integrity), presence of data values (completeness), and error in the data values (correctness). R functions calculate data quality metrics based on the provided study data and metadata and R Markdown reports are generated. Guidance on the concept and tools is available through a dedicated website. Conclusions The presented data quality framework is the first of its kind for observational health research data collections that links a formal concept to implementations in R. The framework and tools facilitate harmonized data quality assessments in pursue of transparent and reproducible research. Application scenarios comprise data quality monitoring while a study is carried out as well as performing an initial data analysis before starting substantive scientific analyses.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e0135545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Jao ◽  
Francis Kombe ◽  
Salim Mwalukore ◽  
Susan Bull ◽  
Michael Parker ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Francisca Nordfalk

Public health research depends on access to population data. This article is a study of the practices and the work enabling data collection for public health research. In Denmark, a blood sample is taken from practically every single newborn baby through a national screening programme. These samples can be combined with other health data and used for research purposes without explicit consent from those giving the samples. With an ethnographic approach, I study the practices, the work and the workers of the Danish NDBS samples, and explore how newborn babies come to serve as an important national research resource. From these studies, I argue that the making of national research resources in this way is ‘mutual enablement’ of research data and care. The work of both health professionals and researchers mutually enables professional care and opportunities for collection of samples and data for research. It is through this mutual enablement of research data and care that newborn babies become a national research population.


F1000Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 491
Author(s):  
Daniel G. Hamilton ◽  
Hannah Fraser ◽  
Fiona Fidler ◽  
Steve McDonald ◽  
Anisa Rowhani-Farid ◽  
...  

Numerous studies have demonstrated low but increasing rates of data and code sharing within medical and health research disciplines. However, it remains unclear how commonly data and code are shared across all fields of medical and health research, as well as whether sharing rates are positively associated with implementation of progressive policies by publishers and funders, or growing expectations from the medical and health research community at large. Therefore this systematic review aims to synthesise the findings of medical and health science studies that have empirically investigated the prevalence of data or code sharing, or both. Objectives include the investigation of: (i) the prevalence of public sharing of research data and code alongside published articles (including preprints), (ii) the prevalence of private sharing of research data and code in response to reasonable requests, and (iii) factors associated with the sharing of either research output (e.g., the year published, the publisher’s policy on sharing, the presence of a data or code availability statement). It is hoped that the results will provide some insight into how often research data and code are shared publicly and privately, how this has changed over time, and how effective some measures such as the institution of data sharing policies and data availability statements have been in motivating researchers to share their underlying data and code.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document