An Analysis of the Consent Requirement of Section 84 of the Sheriff and Civil Process Act 2004 and the Judgment Enforcement Powers of Courts

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chimezie Onuzulike
2019 ◽  
pp. 27-35
Author(s):  
Alexandr Neznamov

Digital technologies are no longer the future but are the present of civil proceedings. That is why any research in this direction seems to be relevant. At the same time, some of the fundamental problems remain unattended by the scientific community. One of these problems is the problem of classification of digital technologies in civil proceedings. On the basis of instrumental and genetic approaches to the understanding of digital technologies, it is concluded that their most significant feature is the ability to mediate the interaction of participants in legal proceedings with information; their differentiating feature is the function performed by a particular technology in the interaction with information. On this basis, it is proposed to distinguish the following groups of digital technologies in civil proceedings: a) technologies of recording, storing and displaying (reproducing) information, b) technologies of transferring information, c) technologies of processing information. A brief description is given to each of the groups. Presented classification could serve as a basis for a more systematic discussion of the impact of digital technologies on the essence of civil proceedings. Particularly, it is pointed out that issues of recording, storing, reproducing and transferring information are traditionally more «technological» for civil process, while issues of information processing are more conceptual.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 70-77
Author(s):  
I. I. Tolmacheva ◽  

This article analyzes the issues related to the effect of the principle of oral civil (administrative) proceedings in simplified civil (administrative) proceedings, taking into account that scientific articles Express the opinion that the principles of civil procedure are not fully applied in simplified proceedings. The author proposes to pay attention to the effect of this principle both in the General procedure for consideration of civil cases by the court, and in the simplified procedure (procedure); to identify trends in its development in the real conditions of the Russian civil process, regardless of the procedure for consideration of civil cases.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 42-48
Author(s):  
E. Yu. Boyko

The article is devoted to the directions of improvement of appeal proceedings in the civil process, identified in the analysis of legislation and practice of its application, in connection with the reform of the judicial system. The author not only considers the questions of implementation of the court of appeal of its powers, justifies the need for disclosure of criteria allowing the direction of the court of appeal the case for a new trial in the court of first instance, the limits of choice in the exercise of judicial discretion outside of the petition of appeal, the improvement of term of making a petition of appeal, eliminate of the term “appeal determination”, enshrined in the law of procedure of familiarization with the act court of appeal and its further complaints, but also indicates ways of solving them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document