Rapid Response Infrastructures for Pandemic Preparedness in Tertiary Care Hospitals: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Outbreak in Germany

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Augustin ◽  
Philipp Schommers ◽  
Isabelle Suárez ◽  
Philipp Köhler ◽  
Henning Gruell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Rapid Response ◽  
Pandemic Preparedness ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospitals

scholarly journals Rapid response infrastructure for pandemic preparedness in a tertiary care hospital: lessons learned from the COVID-19 outbreak in Cologne, Germany, February to March 2020

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (21) ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Augustin ◽  
Philipp Schommers ◽  
Isabelle Suárez ◽  
Philipp Koehler ◽  
Henning Gruell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Epidemiological Data ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Rapid Response ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Emergency Rooms ◽  
Pandemic Preparedness ◽  
Effective Response ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Outpatient Departments

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has caused tremendous pressure on hospital infrastructures such as emergency rooms (ER) and outpatient departments. To avoid malfunctioning of critical services because of large numbers of potentially infected patients seeking consultation, we established a COVID-19 rapid response infrastructure (CRRI), which instantly restored ER functionality. The CRRI was also used for testing of hospital personnel, provided epidemiological data and was a highly effective response to increasing numbers of suspected COVID-19 cases.

scholarly journals Dealing with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a rapid response team operation in Brazil: Quality in practice

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hermano Alexandre Lima Rocha ◽  
Antonia Célia de Castro Alcântara ◽  
Fernanda Colares de Borba Netto ◽  
Flavio Lucio Pontes Ibiapina ◽  
Livia Amaral Lopes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Rapid Response Team ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Rapid Response ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Large Tertiary Care ◽  
Response Team ◽  
Hospital Wards ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Quality problem or issue Up to 13 July 2020, >12 million laboratory-confirmed cases of coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) infection have been reported worldwide, 1 864 681 in Brazil. We aimed to assess an intervention to deal with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the operations of a rapid response team (RRT). Initial assessment An observational study with medical record review was carried out at a large tertiary care hospital in Fortaleza, a 400-bed quaternary hospital, 96 of which are intensive care unit beds. All adult patients admitted to hospital wards, treated by the RRTs during the study period, were included, and a total of 15 461 RRT calls were analyzed. Choice of solution Adequacy of workforce sizing. Implementation The hospital adjusted the size of its RRTs during the period, going from two to four simultaneous on-duty medical professionals. Evaluation After the beginning of the pandemic, the number of treated cases in general went from an average of 30.6 daily calls to 79.2, whereas the extremely critical cases went from 3.5 to 22 on average. In percentages, the extremely critical care cases went from 10.47 to 20%, with P < 0.001. Patient mortality remained unchanged. The number of critically ill cases and the number of treated patients increased 2-fold in relation to the prepandemic period, but the effectiveness of the RRT in relation to mortality was not affected. Lessons learned The observation of these data is important for hospital managers to adjust the size of their RRTs according to the new scenario, aiming to maintain the intervention effectiveness.

CIScoSI Study [Children Immunization Status and cases of Systemic Illness]

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
East Asia ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Immunization Coverage ◽  
South East Asia ◽  
Immunization Status ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospitals ◽  
Total Coverage

To determine the immunization status of pediatric patients under age of 5 years visiting pediatric department of tertiary care hospitals in South East Asia. The aim of this study was to appreciate the awareness and implementation of vaccination in pediatric patients who came into pediatric outpatient Department with presenting complain other than routine vaccination. we can also know the count of patients who do not complete their vaccination after birth. we can differentiate between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients and incidence of severe disease in both groups. Immunization is a protective process which makes a person resistant to the harmful diseases prevailing in the community, typically by vaccine administration either orally or intravenously. It is proven for controlling and eliminating many threatening diseases from the community. WHO report that licensed vaccines are available for the prevention of many infectious diseases. After the implementation of effective immunization the rate of many infectious diseases have declined in many countries of the world. South-East Asia is far behind in the immunization coverage. An estimated total coverage is 56%-88% for a fully immunized child, which is variable between countries. Also the coverage is highest for BCG and lowest for Polio.

Study of Mortality Patterns among Hospitalized Patients in Public Sector Tertiary Care Hospitals Faisalabad, Pakistan

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-242
Author(s):  
Muhammad Arif Ali ◽  
Ayesha Arif ◽  
Tehreem Fatima ◽  
Muhammad Moaaz Arif
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospitals

scholarly journals Interhospital referral of colorectal cancer patients: a Dutch population-based study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. Warps ◽  
◽  
M. P. M. de Neree tot Babberich ◽  
E. Dekker ◽  
M. W. J. M. Wouters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Waiting Time ◽  
Secondary Care ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospitals

Abstract Purpose Interhospital referral is a consequence of centralization of complex oncological care but might negatively impact waiting time, a quality indicator in the Netherlands. This study aims to evaluate characteristics and waiting times of patients with primary colorectal cancer who are referred between hospitals. Methods Data were extracted from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit (2015-2019). Waiting time between first tumor-positive biopsy until first treatment was compared between subgroups stratified for referral status, disease stage, and type of hospital. Results In total, 46,561 patients were included. Patients treated for colon or rectal cancer in secondary care hospitals were referred in 12.2% and 14.7%, respectively. In tertiary care hospitals, corresponding referral rates were 43.8% and 66.4%. Referred patients in tertiary care hospitals were younger, but had a more advanced disease stage, and underwent more often multivisceral resection and simultaneous metastasectomy than non-referred patients in secondary care hospitals (p<0.001). Referred patients were more often treated within national quality standards for waiting time compared to non-referred patients (p<0.001). For referred patients, longer waiting times prior to MDT were observed compared to non-referred patients within each hospital type, although most time was spent post-MDT. Conclusion A large proportion of colorectal cancer patients that are treated in tertiary care hospitals are referred from another hospital but mostly treated within standards for waiting time. These patients are younger but often have a more advanced disease. This suggests that these patients are willing to travel more but also reflects successful centralization of complex oncological patients in the Netherlands.

The ethics of pandemic preparedness revisited - autonomy, quarantine, transferability and trust

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Schröder-Bäck ◽  
T Schloemer ◽  
K Martakis ◽  
C Brall
Keyword(s):  
Crisis Management ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Ethical Challenges ◽  
Pandemic Preparedness ◽  
Ethical Aspects ◽  
Outbreak Management ◽  
Ethics Framework ◽  
Ethical Point

Abstract Background The outbreak of SARS in 2002 lead to a public health ethics discourse. The crisis management of that time was ethically analysed and lessons to be learned discussed. Scholarship and WHO, among others, developed an ethics of pandemic preparedness. The current “corona crisis” also faces us with ethical challenges. This presentation is comparing the two crises from an ethical point of view and a focus on Europe. Methods An ethics framework for pandemic preparedness (Schröder et al. 2006 and Schröder-Bäck 2014) is used to make a synopsis of ethical issues. Ethical aspects of 2002 and 2020 that were discussed in the literature and in the media are compared. For 2020, the focus is on interventions in Italy, Germany, Switzerland, and the Netherlands. Results Topics that emerged from the 2002 crisis were, among others, revolving around aspects of stigmatisation and fair distribution of scarce resources (esp. vaccines, antivirals). Currently, most urgent and ethically challenging aspects relate to social distancing vs. autonomy: Isolation and quarantine are handled differently across Europe and the EU. Questions of transferability of such interventions prevail. Contexts vary vertically over time (2002 vs. 2020) and horizontally (e.g. between Italy and Germany at the same time). Furthermore, trust in authorities, media and health information is a key issue. Conclusions Ethical aspects are key for good pandemic preparedness and management. The context of the crises between 2002 and 2020 has slightly changed, also based on “lessons learned” from 2002. This has implications on ethical issues that are being discussed. New lessons will have to be learned from the 2020 crisis. Key messages Pandemic preparedness and outbreak management entail many ethical tensions that need to be addressed. Currently, questions of trust and transferability are key to the crisis management, further ethical issues could still emerge.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document