Do Bank Regulation and Supervision Increase or Decrease Systemic Risk: Cross Country Evidence

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Chen ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Hong Liu ◽  
Yue Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Risk ◽  
Bank Regulation ◽  
Regulation And Supervision ◽  
Bank Regulation And Supervision ◽  
Cross Country

scholarly journals Bank regulation and systemic risk: cross country evidence

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Chen ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Frank Hong Liu ◽  
Yue Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Risk ◽  
Bank Regulation ◽  
Activity Restriction ◽  
Instrumental Variable Analysis ◽  
Regulation And Supervision ◽  
Marginal Expected Shortfall ◽  
Bank Regulation And Supervision ◽  
Cross Country ◽  
Using Data ◽  
The Impact

AbstractUsing data for banks from 65 countries for the period 2001–2013, we investigate the impact of bank regulation and supervision on individual banks’ systemic risk. Our cross-country empirical findings show that bank activity restriction, initial capital stringency and prompt corrective action are all positively related to systemic risk, measured by Marginal Expected Shortfall. We use the staggered timing of the implementation of Basel II regulation across countries as an exogenous event and use latitude for instrumental variable analysis to alleviate the endogeneity concern. Our results also hold for various robustness tests. We further find that the level of equity banks can alleviate such effect, while bank size is likely to enhance the effect, supporting our conjecture that the impact of bank regulation and supervision on systemic risk is through bank’s capital shortfall. Our results do not argue against bank regulation, but rather focus on the design and implementation of regulation.

scholarly journals Does bank regulation and supervision impedes the efficiency of microfinance institutions to eradicate poverty? Evidence from ASEAN-5 countries

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurazilah Zainal ◽  
Annuar Md Nassir ◽  
Fakarudin Kamarudin ◽  
Siong Hook Law
Keyword(s):  
Poverty Reduction ◽  
Bank Regulation ◽  
Financial Sustainability ◽  
Microfinance Institutions ◽  
Social Efficiency ◽  
Financial Efficiency ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Regulation And Supervision ◽  
The Social ◽  
Bank Regulation And Supervision

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine how banking regulation and supervision affect the performance of microfinance institutions (MFIs). It proposes performance of the MFIs from the aspect of social and financial efficiency because the MFIs nowadays not only view to sustain the social role of poverty eradication but in the same time they must strive the financial sustainability to maintain the operation in long run. This study also includes the macroeconomic condition and firm level variables to control for social and financial efficiency of the MFIs. Design/methodology/approach The data consists 168 MFIs from five countries in Southeast Asia from year 2011 to 2017. First stage of analysis is to identify level of social and financial efficiency by using data envelopment analysis approach. Second stage is to examine impact of bank regulation and supervision to the social and financial efficiency by applying panel regression analysis and generalized method of moments for robust estimation methods. Findings The finding shows the MFIs own lower social efficiency and higher score in financial efficiency. This indicates in pursuing financial sustainability, the MFIs in Southeast Asia countries have lost sight of their original mission of poverty reduction. Furthermore, the result also presents a significant impact of bank regulation and supervision to the social and financial efficiency of the MFIs. However, the results appear in different direction when more negative effect is associated with social efficiency. This specifies that bank regulation and supervision are not appropriate to accommodate the social needs, thus hampering the effort of poverty reduction by the MFIs. Research limitations/implications The present study only concentrates on the impact bank regulation and supervision to the performance of the MFIs. As the operation of the MFIs currently has been largely exposed in banking operation, it is suggested that future studies to look for other special issues such as country governance that might influence specifically in social and financial aspect of the MFIs. Practical implications The empirical findings from this study could be useful and may have significant implications for the regulators. The regulators or policymakers could establish the new regulation framework that fulfil the dual needs (social and financial) of the MFIs. Furthermore, the empirical findings also could serve as guidance to regulators and decision-makers in designing new policies for a sustainable and competitive sector of the MFIs. Although the MFIs recently brings a similar role as commercial banks, they need to retain the social aspects as that is the original mission of the MFIs Originality/value The present study proves that the bank regulation and supervision have brought a significant influence to the performance of the MFIs in ASEAN 5 countries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document