The Moderating Role of Family Ownership in Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Social Performance

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanthini Arujunan ◽  
Fathyah Hashim ◽  
Mohd Faizal Jamaludin
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Gender Diversity ◽  
Family Ownership ◽  
Board Gender Diversity ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Moderating Role

scholarly journals Can board gender diversity promote corporate social performance?

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 789-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khine Kyaw ◽  
Mojisola Olugbode ◽  
Barbara Petracci
Keyword(s):  
Emerging Markets ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Critical Mass ◽  
Gender Diversity ◽  
Corporate Boards ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Clear Cut ◽  
Board Gender Diversity ◽  
Corporate Social

Purpose This paper examines if gender diversity on corporate boards promotes corporate social performance (CSP) across industries and across countries. Design/methodology/approach Fixed-effect panel models are estimated using Europe-wide data from 2002 through 2013. Instrumental variable estimation and propensity score matching are also used to control for potential endogeneity. Findings Board gender diversity (BGD) improves environmental and social performance and consequently the CSP. Although the positive effect of gender diversity is prevalent across industries, the effect is more pronounced for firms in emerging markets. Practical implications The findings suggest that gender law that fosters gender diversity can promote CSP in firms, and the benefit can be enjoyed with just an introduction of one female director to the board. Promotion of gender diversity in Europe is most beneficial in emerging markets. Originality/value The results provide new insights to the literature, as we find that a critical mass of female directors on boards is not required to promote CSP. The research also highlights that BGD enhances CSP irrespective of the industry, and the effect on CSP is more pronounced in emerging markets where regulations regarding CSR are not so clear-cut.

scholarly journals Board Gender Diversity, Social Performance, and CEO Compensation

1970 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
K. Gilley ◽  
Kelly Weeks ◽  
Joseph Coombs ◽  
Myrtle Bell ◽  
Donald Kluemper
Keyword(s):  
Executive Compensation ◽  
Ceo Compensation ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Gender Diversity ◽  
Fortune 500 ◽  
Fortune 500 Companies ◽  
Ceo Pay ◽  
Board Gender Diversity ◽  
Corporate Social

This study examines the extent to which board gender diversity and corporatesocial performance influence CEO compensation. The sample includes 1,829observations from 262 Fortune 500 companies over multiple years. Findings indicatethat board gender diversity and corporate social performance interact to predict CEOcompensation. The data show that boards comprised of a higher percentage of womenplace increasing emphasis on certain kinds of corporate social performance whensetting CEO pay, and decreasing emphasis on other types of social performance. Ourfindings highlight the complex interrelationships between executive compensation,board composition, and corporate social performance.

Revisiting the financial performance – corporate social performance link

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 2586-2602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serin Choi ◽  
Seoki Lee
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Agency Theory ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Moderating Role

Purpose The existing literature has focused heavily on investigating the effect of corporate social performance (CSP) on financial performance (FP) but has not paid sufficient attention to an inverse causation of the relationship. Moreover, while some of the literature argues that FP positively affects CSP, based on the slack resources theory, others have found negative effects of FP on CSP, supporting the managerial opportunism perspective. Thus, this paper aims to address the impact of FP on CSP. Further, this study examines the moderating role of franchising to better understand the relationship. Design/methodology/approach This study uses and expands the models derived from the CSP literature to confirm the effects of FP on CSP with the moderating role of franchising within the restaurant industry. Using two-way fixed effects models, it effectively addresses important problems embedded in the panel data. Findings The findings show a positive effect of FP on CSP, which is inconsistent with Park and Lee’s (2009) findings and supports the slack resources theory. Further, the interesting results show that the impact of FP on CSP diminishes as a firm franchises more, supporting the double-sided moral hazard framework of the agency theory. Originality/value This paper fills the lacuna in both the existing literature on the relationship between CSP and FP and the franchising. This study contributes to enhancing restaurant practitioners’ understanding of the double-sided moral hazard of agency theory unique to franchising context.

scholarly journals The Effect of Corporate Social Performance on Audit Hours: Moderating Role of the Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs in Audit Report

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 931
Author(s):  
Hyun Ah Kim ◽  
Nam Chul Jung
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Audit Report ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Audit Risk ◽  
Potential Risks ◽  
Audit Reports ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Moderating Role

This study investigated the effect of corporate social performance (CSP) on audit hours and whether the emphasis of matter (EOM) paragraphs in audit report moderates the association between CSP and audit hours. Auditors input audit hours based on the judgement of audit risk related to firm and managerial characteristics. They increase audit hours when they perceive that client companies are riskier; thus, audit hours reflect auditors’ perceptions of the firm. Prior studies have shown that high CSP is associated with ethical managers, leading to fewer audit hours. However, auditors’ perceptions of CSP can be different depending on their knowledge about firms’ potential risks. EOM paragraphs consists of risk-related factors, such as going-concern opinions or litigation and they should be considered when auditors determine that users need to check this information acquired in the auditing process. Therefore, EOM is likely to affect auditors’ perceptions of CSP. This study investigates this possibility by examining whether the associations between CSP and audit hours are different in firms with and without EOM paragraphs in audit reports. Using Korean listed companies from 2011 to 2016, we found that CSP has a negative association with audit hours, suggesting that better CSP is related to ethical corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Korea, consistently with the literature. However, CSP is not related to audit hours for firms with EOM paragraphs, possibly indicating that auditors differently interpret CSP based on their knowledge gained in the auditing process. Our findings contribute to the literature by suggesting that EOM paragraphs can be used in distinguishing firms’ CSR motivations and that information users should be careful in interpreting CSP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document