New Physician Specialty Training System Impact on Distribution of Trainees in Japan

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Saito ◽  
Tetsuya Tanimoto ◽  
Masahiro Kami ◽  
Yosuke Suzuki ◽  
Tomohiro Morita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Training System ◽  
Specialty Training ◽  
Physician Specialty ◽  
System Impact

New physician specialty training system impact on distribution of trainees in Japan

Public Health ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 182 ◽  
pp. 143-150
Author(s):  
H. Saito ◽  
T. Tanimoto ◽  
M. Kami ◽  
Y. Suzuki ◽  
T. Morita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Training System ◽  
Specialty Training ◽  
Physician Specialty ◽  
System Impact

Laos builds specialty training system through partnerships

The Lancet ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 378 (9792) ◽  
pp. 653-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Nightingale
Keyword(s):  
Training System ◽  
Specialty Training

Training system impact assessment: a review, reconceptualisation, and extension

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Kotnour ◽  
Rafael Landaeta ◽  
Stephanie Lackey
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Training System ◽  
System Impact

Comparison of public health and preventive medicine physician specialty training in six countries: Identifying challenges and opportunities

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 1146-1151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel M. Peik ◽  
Keerthi M. Mohan ◽  
Toshiaki Baba ◽  
Morgane Donadel ◽  
Andrea Labruto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Preventive Medicine ◽  
Specialty Training ◽  
Physician Specialty ◽  
Medicine Physician ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities

scholarly journals An analysis of the medical specialty training system in Spain

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
José-Manuel Freire ◽  
Alberto Infante ◽  
Adriana Cavalcanti de Aguiar ◽  
Pilar Carbajo
Keyword(s):  
Medical Specialty ◽  
Training System ◽  
Specialty Training

scholarly journals Specialty training system in Poland in 2011-2018 according to the Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education register data

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Wojciech Stefan Zgliczyński ◽  
Zbigniew Węgrzyn ◽  
Mariusz Ruiz ◽  
Andrzej Żochowski ◽  
Mateusz Jankowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Education ◽  
Postgraduate Medical Education ◽  
Training System ◽  
Quantitative Character ◽  
Specialty Training ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative ◽  
Medical Specialists ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Quantitative Changes

Introduction: The specialty training system in Poland is subject to constant changes on the formal and legal as well as qualitative and quantitative levels. These changes should be analysed on an ongoing basis to assess the directions of development of education for medical specialists. Objective of the paper: The study aimed to determine the quantitative changes taking place in the system of specialty training of physicians in general and in ten most numerous fields of medicine in the years 2011-2018. Material and methods: Data from the register of physicians undergoing specialty training conducted by the Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education from 2011 to 2018 constituted the material for analysis. The analysis of the material was of quantitative character. The data analysis was performed using the Statistica 12 Software (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, the USA). Results: The analysis of data from the register of physicians undergoing specialty training indicates that the number of physicians who trained to be specialists and the percentage of women in the group increased in the years 2011-2018. In the period in question, the percentage of doctors in training within a residency, the number of specialty training providers the number of training places and the use of training places enabling them to pursue specialisation rose as well. The situation differed between 10 specialties analysed. Conclusions: The system of post-graduate education of physicians in Poland in the years 2011-2018 constantly developed and increasingly took advantage of most of its opportunities.

scholarly journals Barriers to getting into postgraduate specialty training for junior Australian doctors: An interview-based study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0258584
Author(s):  
Belinda O’Sullivan ◽  
Matthew McGrail ◽  
Tiana Gurney ◽  
Priya Martin
Keyword(s):  
Medical Training ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Training System ◽  
Early Career ◽  
Junior Doctors ◽  
Specialty Training ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Specialty Fields ◽  
The Right

Background Medical training is a long process that is not complete until doctors finish specialty training. Getting into specialty training is challenging because of strong competition for limited places, depending on doctors’ chosen field. This may have a negative impact on doctor well-being and reduce the efficiency of the medical training system. This study explored the barriers of pre-registrar (junior) doctors getting into specialty training programs to inform tailored support and re-design of speciality entry systems. Methods From March to October 2019, we conducted 32 semi-structured interviews with early-career doctors in Australia, who had chosen their specialty field, and were either seeking entry, currently undertaking or had recently completed various fields of specialty training. We sought reflections about barriers and major influences to getting into specialty training. In comparing and contrasting generated themes, different patterns emerged from doctors targeting traditionally non-competitive specialty fields like General Practice (GP) and other specialties (typically more competitive fields). As a result we explored the data in this dichotomy. Results Doctors targeting entry to GP specialties had relatively seamless training entry and few specific barriers. In contrast, those pursuing other specialties, regardless of which ones, relayed multiple barriers of: Navigating an unpredictable and complex system with informal support/guidance; Connecting to the right people/networks for relevant experience; Pro-actively planning and differentiating skills with recurrent failure of applications. Conclusions Our exploratory study suggests that doctors wanting to get into non-GP specialty training may experience strong barriers, potentially over multiple years, with the capacity to threaten their morale and resilience. These could be addressed by a clearinghouse of information about different speciality programs, broader selection criteria, feedback on applications and more formal guidance and professional supports. The absence of challenges identified for doctors seeking entry to GP could be used to promote increased uptake of GP careers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document