The Term Structure of Short-Term Interest Rate Futures Volatility

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Gurrola-Perez ◽  
Renata Herrerias
2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-103
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Aubry ◽  
Pierre Duguay

Abstract In this paper we deal with the financial sector of CANDIDE 1.1. We are concerned with the determination of the short-term interest rate, the term structure equations, and the channels through which monetary policy influences the real sector. The short-term rate is determined by a straightforward application of Keynesian liquidity preference theory. A serious problem arises from the directly estimated reduced form equation, which implies that the demand for high powered money, but not the demand for actual deposits, is a stable function of income and interest rates. The structural equations imply the opposite. In the term structure equations, allowance is made for the smaller variance of the long-term rates, but insufficient explanation is given for their sharper upward trend. This leads to an overstatement of the significance of the U.S. long-term rate that must perform the explanatory role. Moreover a strong structural hierarchy, by which the long Canada rate wags the industrial rate, is imposed without prior testing. In CANDIDE two channels of monetary influence are recognized: the costs of capital and the availability of credit. They affect the business fixed investment and housing sectors. The potential of the personal consumption sector is not recognized, the wealth and real balance effects are bypassed, the credit availability proxy is incorrect, the interest rate used in the real sector is nominal rather than real, and the specification of the housing sector is dubious.


Author(s):  
Toby A. White

The London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR), the rate for which banks can borrow short-term from each other, and perhaps the most common floating interest rate benchmark, is going away, and may become obsolete by end of year (EOY) 2021. LIBOR is being replaced by the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) in the U.S. and by other country-specific alternative risk-free rates abroad. However, SOFR differs in several key respects from LIBOR; for example, LIBOR includes credit risk, is unsecured, is based on expert judgment, and has a full-term structure, whereas SOFR is a risk-free rate, is collateralized, is based on market transactions, and has no term structure. We examine the credit risk and maturity risk adjustments needed to ease the transition, along with fallback provisions for legacy contracts tied to LIBOR. We discuss the ramifications of rate transition to insurance companies, as it relates to their assets, liabilities, and internal processes. We then consider the perspective of both U.S. and global insurance regulators while highlighting specific areas of inquiry. We conclude with an overview of general recommendations for insurers to manage these risks, along with a detailed discussion about whether interest rate swaps tied to LIBOR will continue to be deemed as an effective hedge for accounting and valuation purposes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 05 (02) ◽  
pp. 1850018
Author(s):  
Ramaprasad Bhar ◽  
Damien Lee

Most reported stochastic volatility (SV) model for interest rates only deals with an AR specification for the latent factor process. We show in this paper the technical details for specifying the SV model for interest rates that includes an ARMA structure, a jump component and additional exogenous variables for the latent factor process. We demonstrate the efficacy of this approach with an application to the US short-term interest rate data. We find that the elasticity parameter of the variance is closer to 0.5, i.e., similar to that of the Cox–Ingersoll–Ross (1985) model of interest rates. This is quite a contrast to the finding Chan et al. [Chan, KC, GA Karolyi, F Longstaff and A Sanders (1992). The volatility of short-term interest rates: An empirical comparison of alternative models of term structure of interest rates, Journal of Finance, 47, 1209–1227]. who found the elasticity to be close to 1.5.


2006 ◽  
Vol 2006 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Daobai Liu

In the considered bond market, there are N zero-coupon bonds transacted continuously, which will mature at equally spaced dates. A duration of bond portfolios under stochastic interest rate model is introduced, which provides a measurement for the interest rate risk. Then we consider an optimal bond investment term-structure management problem using this duration as a performance index, and with the short-term interest rate process satisfying some stochastic differential equation. Under some technique conditions, an optimal bond portfolio process is obtained.


2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian R. Miltersen ◽  
J. Aase Nielsen ◽  
Klaus Sandmann

1983 ◽  
pp. 69-100
Author(s):  
Brendan Brown ◽  
Charles R. Geisst

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document