Restructuring Issue Space: Unifying Proximity and Directional Models

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaehyun Song
Keyword(s):  
1991 ◽  
Vol 39 (454) ◽  
pp. 604-608
Author(s):  
Tetsuichi ITO ◽  
Toshio AKIMOTO ◽  
Norio SUZUKI ◽  
Osamu KOBAYASHI ◽  
Koichi HOZUMI ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 39 (454) ◽  
pp. 565-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto NAGATOMO ◽  
Yoshifumi INATANI ◽  
Yoshihiro NARUO ◽  
Jun'ichiro KAWAGUCHI
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
B. R. Crick

This list is compiled from materiel discovered subsequent to the publication of the Guide, and more particularly in response to letters and circulars sent to all British archives during June and July, 1962. Some reports in process of clarification have been held over for a future issue. Space does not allow the detail given in the Guide. Few of these reports have been verified by direct inspection, nor have proper names been checked. This is, as it were, a “first draft” of some speculative Second Edition of the Guide. Additions, corrections and further addenda will be very welcome and should be sent to me at L. S. E. I thank Mrs. Noomi Connelly for helping me in the compilation.


2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Michael Alvarez ◽  
Jonathan Nagler

An important property of any party system is the set of choices it presents to the electorate. In this paper we analyze the distribution of parties relative to voters in the multidimensional issue space and introduce two measures of the dispersion of the parties in the issue space relative to the voters, which we call measures of the compactness of the parties in the issue space. We show how compactness is easily computed using standard survey items found on national election surveys. Because we study the spacing of the parties relative to the distribution of the voters, we produce metric-free measures of compactness of the party system. The measures can be used to compare party systems across issues, over time within countries, and across countries. Comparing the compactness of party systems across countries allows us to determine the relative amount of issue choice afforded voters in different polities. We examine the compactness of the issue space and test the impact it has on voter choice in four countries: the United States, the Netherlands, Canada, and Great Britain. We demonstrate that the more compact the distribution of the parties in the issue space on any given issue, the less voters weight that issue in their vote decision. Thus we provide evidence supporting theories suggesting that the greater the choice offered by the parties in an election, the more likely it is that issue voting will play a major role in that election.


2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (50) ◽  
pp. e2102148118
Author(s):  
Mari Kawakatsu ◽  
Yphtach Lelkes ◽  
Simon A. Levin ◽  
Corina E. Tarnita

Political theorists have long argued that enlarging the political sphere to include a greater diversity of interests would cure the ills of factions in a pluralistic society. While the scope of politics has expanded dramatically over the past 75 y, polarization is markedly worse. Motivated by this paradox, we take a bottom–up approach to explore how partisan individual-level dynamics in a diverse (multidimensional) issue space can shape collective-level factionalization via an emergent dimensionality reduction. We extend a model of cultural evolution grounded in evolutionary game theory, in which individuals accumulate benefits through pairwise interactions and imitate (or learn) the strategies of successful others. The degree of partisanship determines the likelihood of learning from individuals of the opposite party. This approach captures the coupling between individual behavior, partisan-mediated opinion dynamics, and an interaction network that changes endogenously according to the evolving interests of individuals. We find that while expanding the diversity of interests can indeed improve both individual and collective outcomes, increasingly high partisan bias promotes a reduction in issue dimensionality via party-based assortment that leads to increasing polarization. When party bias becomes extreme, it also boosts interindividual cooperation, thereby further entrenching extreme polarization and creating a tug-of-war between individual cooperation and societal cohesion. These dangers of extreme partisanship are highest when individuals’ interests and opinions are heavily shaped by peers and there is little independent exploration. Overall, our findings highlight the urgency to study polarization in a coupled, multilevel context.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document