Does Winning a Patent Race Lead to More Follow-On Innovation?

Author(s):  
Neil Thompson ◽  
Jeffrey M. Kuhn
Keyword(s):  
Nature ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 335 (6189) ◽  
pp. 389-389
Author(s):  
David Swinbanks
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRISTINE HALMENSCHLAGER

2002 ◽  
Vol 222 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Hübner

SummaryUsing a duopoly model of a patent race, it is shown that a stricter environmental policy might increase the probability of a sleeping patent instead of encouraging environmental technological progress. Two scenarios are discussed. The first concerns the regulation of a firm that competes with a foreign firm. The second concerns the regulation of a duopoly in a closed economy.


Nature ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 334 (6181) ◽  
pp. 368-368
Author(s):  
David Swinbanks
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 843-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Garlappi

AbstractI analyze the impact of competition on the risk premia of R&D ventures engaged in a multiple-stage patent race with technical and market uncertainty. After solving in closed form for the case of a two-stage race in continuous time, I show that a firm's risk premium decreases as a consequence of technical progress and increases when a rival pulls ahead. Compared to the case where firms collude, R&D competition erodes the option value to mothball a project, reduces the completion time and the failure rate of R&D, and causes higher and more volatile risk premia. Numerical simulations reveal that competition can generate risk premia up to 500 annual basis points higher and up to three times more volatility than in a collusive industry.


Games ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Faria ◽  
Franklin Mixon, Jr. ◽  
Steven Caudill ◽  
Samantha Wineke

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document