Is Opportunity Cost Synonymous with Cost of Capital and Required Rate of Return?: Untangling the Present Value Discount Rate

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Dawson
Keyword(s):  
Discount Rate ◽  
Opportunity Cost ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Present Value

scholarly journals The most appropriate discount rate

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (03) ◽  
pp. 391-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Burgess ◽  
Richard O. Zerbe
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Discount Rate ◽  
Opportunity Cost ◽  
Time Preference ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Social Time ◽  
The Social ◽  
Benefits And Costs

The social opportunity cost of capital discount rate is the appropriate discount rate to use when evaluating government projects. It satisfies the fundamental rule that no project should be accepted that has a rate of return less than alternative available projects, and it ensures that worthy projects satisfy the potential Pareto test. The social time preference approach advocated by Moore et al. fails to satisfy either of these criteria even in the unlikely case that the private sector behaves myopically with respect to a project’s future benefits and costs.

The Weitzman Argument

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Gollier
Keyword(s):  
Discount Rate ◽  
Opportunity Cost ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
Simple Rule ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Net Benefit ◽  
Investment Projects ◽  
Net Benefits

This chapter examines a model in which the exogeneous rate of return of capital is constant but random. Safe investment projects must be evaluated and implemented before this uncertainty can be fully revealed, i.e., before knowing the opportunity cost of capital. A simple rule of thumb in this context would be to compute the net present value (NPV) for each possible discount rate, and to implement the project if the expected NPV is positive. If the evaluator uses this approach, this is as if one would discount cash flows at a rate that is decreasing with maturity. This approach is implicitly based on the assumptions that the stakeholders are risk-neutral and transfer the net benefits of the project to an increase in immediate consumption. Opposite results prevail if one assumes that the net benefit is consumed at the maturity of the project.

Introducing Investment Options

2021 ◽  
pp. 131-135
Author(s):  
Camilla Toulmin
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Opportunity Cost ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Payback Period ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Internal Rate Of Return ◽  
Risk And Uncertainty ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Over Time

This chapter offers a brief survey of how the investment literature deals with risk and uncertainty, and examines the reasons for variation in returns between farmers from the principal assets – wells, oxen plough-teams, breeding cattle. Simple decision-making models derive criteria for choosing between investment options according to the net present value, internal rate of return, and payback period associated with a given pattern of returns over time. Portfolio models presents the rationale for investment in a range of assets, the returns from which are poorly correlated. Farmers differ in terms of their access to factors of production, the scale of their activities, the opportunity cost of capital, and vulnerability to risk. Four idealised household types – A, B, C, D – are described in order to compare the flow of returns from the three principal investments – wells, oxen plough-teams, and breeding cattle.

Distortions Imposed by Inflation on Historical-Cost Depreciation

1983 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-98
Author(s):  
Boris E. Bravo-Ureta
Keyword(s):  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Economic Cost ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Tax Rate ◽  
The Real ◽  
Historical Cost ◽  
Depreciation Methods

The use of historical-cost depreciation in periods of persistent inflation decreases the present value of depreciation deductions, thus understating the true economic cost of capital and increasing the real after-tax rate of return required by potential investors. Efforts to correct these problems by adopting depreciation methods that allow for artificially short recovery periods or accelerated rates do not provide an adequate solution. Distortions imposed by inflation on historical-cost depreciation can be adequately corrected by indexing the historical-cost basis.

On a social discount rate for forestry

1985 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 927-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Harou
Keyword(s):  
Discount Rate ◽  
Opportunity Cost ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Shadow Price ◽  
Social Benefits ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Social Discount Rate ◽  
The Social ◽  
Forestry Investments ◽  
Present Worth

After a review of the literature on the discount rate in economics and forestry, a methodology is proposed to arrive at an appropriate social discount rate to appraise public forestry investments. In the proposed approach, the opportunity cost of capital is considered in the establishment of a shadow price of investment. The social discount rate, which should weight the project net social benefits through time, is an unknown of the net present worth equation set equal to zero.

Serial Defaults, Serial Profits

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricio Drelichman ◽  
Hans-Joachim Voth
Keyword(s):  
Opportunity Cost ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Philip Ii ◽  
Alternative Investments

This chapter looks at the profitability of banking families. Lending to the king of Spain made good business sense; it was hugely profitable on average, despite periodic defaults and restructurings. Defaults and reschedulings reduced the rate of return, but profitability net of these losses was still high—and markedly higher than the return on alternative investments. The same conclusion emerges from analyzing the profitability of loans by the banking dynasty. Of the sixty families that lent to Philip, only five failed to earn their likely opportunity cost of capital—and these bankers provided only a negligible proportion of the short-term loans taken out by the king. As a consequence, few financiers ever stopped lending to Philip II.

B. ANALISA KELAYAKAN BISNIS PADA USAHA SWEETIN

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Vivi Indah Yani ◽  
Rachmat Mustofa Pratama ◽  
Izza Islami ◽  
Iman Supriadi
Keyword(s):  
Net Present Value ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Payback Period ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Internal Rate Of Return ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Internal Rate ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Business Study

Abstrak Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis dan mendeskripsikan studi kelayakan bisnis yang dilakukan pada Kewirausahaan “Sweetin” yaitu usaha yang baru dirintis di Surabaya dalam bidang makanan (dessert). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR) dan Payback Period (PP). Hasil yang diperoleh dalam penelitian ini yaitu nilai NPV sebesar Rp. 1.910.819 > dari nol. Nilai IRR sebesar 110% > dari cost of capital 10%. Dan PP 1 bulan. Hal ini berarti kewirausahaan Sweetin ini menunjukkan bahwa secara non-finansial dan finansial layak untuk dijalankan. Kata kunci: Kelayakan Usaha, Non-Finansial, Finansial Abstract             The purpose of this research is to analyze and describe the business study conducted on “Sweetin” Entrepreneurship, a business that has just been pioneered in Surabaya in the field of food (dessert). This study uses the method of Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Payback Period (PP). The results obtained in this study are the NPV value of Rp. 1,910,819> from zero. The IRR value is 110%> 10% of the cost of capital. And 1month PP. This means that Sweetin's entrepreneurship shows that it is non-financially and financially feasible to run. Keywords: Business Feasibility, Non-financial, Financial

scholarly journals Pengembangan Model Fuzzy Project Evaluation Untuk Analisis Kelayakan Finansial Pendirian Pabrik Baru

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Yuniar Farida
Keyword(s):  
Discount Rate ◽  
Fuzzy Number ◽  
Average Cost ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Project Evaluation ◽  
Triangular Fuzzy Number ◽  
Present Value

Untuk rencana pembangunan suatu pabrik baru, aspek finansial merupakan aspek terpenting dalam evaluasi kelayakannya. Dikatakan demikian, karena sekalipun aspek lain tergolong layak, jika studi aspek finansial memberikan hasil yang tidak layak, maka usulan proyek akan ditolak karena tidak memberikan manfaat ekonomi. Dalam penelitian ini Net Present Value (NPV) digunakan sebagai metode evaluasi kelayakan finansial rencana pendirian pabrik PT. X. Dalam perhitungan NPV, salah satu faktor yang krusial adalah tarif diskonto atau discount rate yang berlaku pada masa pengembalian investasi suatu proyek. NPV suatu proyek harus dihitung dengan discount rate konstan sampai masa pengembalian investasi, meski pada kenyataannya faktor – faktor yang mempengaruhi discount rate setiap tahun tidak selalu sama, akibatnya nilai NPV menjadi samar (fuzzy). Untuk mengatasi hal tersebut, maka dilakukan suatu pemodelan untuk mendekati nilai discount rate yang tepat. Dalam penelitian ini discount rate dihitung berdasarkan nilai WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital) yang merupakan gabungan dari struktur modal, yaitu hutang dan ekuitas. Untuk memperoleh nilai WACC yang tepat, dilakukan pendekatan dengan menggunakan Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN). Adapun penggunaan fuzzy dilakukan karena WACC mengandung unsur ketidakpastian yang tinggi, yang bisa membuat perhitungan WACC dengan metode konvensional menjadi samar/kabur. Dari hasil perhitungan menggunakan TFN, diperoleh nilai WACC sebesar 13.64 % dan menghasilkan NPV sebesar 6,430,464,000,000. Sedangkan nilai WACC deterministik yang dihasilkan evaluator sebesar 13.72 % dan menghasilkan NPV sebesar 6,358,310,540,000

scholarly journals Economic and financial approaches to valuing pension liabilities

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT NOVY-MARX
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Discount Rate ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Investment Policy ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Pension Benefit ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Pension Liabilities

AbstractFinancial economics holds that payment streams should be valued using discount rates that reflect the cash flows’ risks. In the case of pension liabilities, the appropriate discount rate for a pension fund's liabilities is the expected rate of return on a portfolio that would be held under a liability-driven investment policy. The valuation of defined benefit pension obligations involves choices revolving around deciding: (1) what future benefit payments to recognize today (i.e., which liability concept to use); and (2) from whose point of view to value the liabilities. Moving towards modeling, the distribution of future liabilities using a ‘risk-neutral’ framework, would allow for calculating the present value of the future liabilities more accurately. This would provide policymakers with information more relevant for the decision-making, and it would also permit easier communication of the risks facing the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation's PIMS model via a single univariate statistic.

scholarly journals The implied cost of capital of government’s claim and the present value of tax shields: A numerical example

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
M. B.J. Schauten ◽  
B. Tans
Keyword(s):  
Discount Rate ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Numerical Example ◽  
Implied Cost Of Capital ◽  
Tax Shields ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Cost

This paper provides a numerical example of how to calculate the cost of capital of government’s claim (rg) and the present value of tax shields. Schauten and Tans (2006) show for the models used in Myers (1974), Miles and Ezzell (1980) and Harris and Pringle (1985), that the present value of tax shields is equal to the difference between the present value of the expected taxes paid by the unlevered firm and the levered firm, with each of the models’ implied rg as discount rate. We discuss a numerical example using the valuation framework by Schauten and Tans (2006) and give a logic explanation for the low implied rgs of Miles and Ezzell’s and Harris and Pringle’s model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document