Equity Investor Sentiment and Bond Market Reaction: Test of Overinvestment and Capital Flow Hypotheses

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Chen
2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 503-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Nishikawa ◽  
Andrew K. Prevost ◽  
Ramesh P. Rao

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 911-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark L. Defond ◽  
Jieying Zhang
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark L. DeFond ◽  
Mingyi Hung ◽  
Emre Carr ◽  
Jieying Zhang

SYNOPSIS We investigate the impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) on corporate bondholder value by examining the bond market reaction to news events leading up to the passage of SOX. The net impact of SOX on bondholder value is difficult to predict, and there are many reasons why it may be viewed as either good or bad news. Our primary analysis reveals a significant decline in average bondholder value around these events. In addition, cross-sectional tests find that the decline is significantly larger among riskier bonds and among bonds held by firms that are expected to experience the greatest changes under SOX. Thus, our findings are consistent with the bond market expecting the exogenously imposed changes under SOX to make bondholders worse off.


2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Francisco Eduardo de Luna e Almeida Santos

The aim of this paper is to measure the endogenous relationship between stock and bond markets. To recover the structural form of this relationship, the author applied the method of identification through heteroskedasticity. Both coefficients were found to be negative which is consistent with the notion that, given an opportunity cost of capital, the returns move in opposite directions in order to promote the equilibrium of the capital flow. However, only the coefficient that measures the impact of bond market over stock markets was significantly different from zero. Thus, the intensity of this relationship also depends on the relative size of the markets under study.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 370-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongdong Chen ◽  
Karen Ann Craig

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of January sentiment on investors’ asset allocation decisions in the US corporate bond market during the rest of the year. Specifically, the study evaluates if the shift in January sentiment is a predictor of corporate bond spreads from February to December. Design/methodology/approach Using corporate bond trades reported in TRACE between 2005 and 2014, the authors examine the ability of the Index of Consumer Sentiment and the Index of Investor Sentiment to predict bond spreads over the 11 months following January. The study evaluates both the sign of the change in sentiment and the magnitude of the change in sentiment using two generalized linear models, controlling for industry, bond and firm fixed effects. Portfolios are analyzed based on yield, firm size and firm leverage. Additional analysis is performed to ensure results are robust to the impacts of the subprime financial crisis. Findings This paper finds that the changes in the sentiment measures in January predict bond spreads associated with bond trades in the subsequent 11 months, and this phenomenon, which the authors label as the “January sentiment effect,” has opposing impacts on risky and less risky bond portfolios. Originality/value This paper adds to the literature on the relationship between sentiment and investor’s allocation decisions. The evidence documented in this study is the first known to find that investors’ allocation decisions in a year are driven by their sentiment in January.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document