scholarly journals Hedge Fund Flows and Performance Streaks: How Investors Weigh Information

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Baquero ◽  
Marno Verbeek
Keyword(s):  
Hedge Fund ◽  
Fund Flows ◽  
And Performance

scholarly journals Hedge Fund Flows and Performance Streaks: How Investors Weigh Information

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Baquero ◽  
Marno Verbeek
Keyword(s):  
Hedge Funds ◽  
Hedge Fund ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
Fund Flows ◽  
Hot Hand ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Processing Abilities ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Types Of Information

Cash flows to hedge funds are highly sensitive to performance streaks, a streak being defined as subsequent quarters during which a fund performs above or below a benchmark, even after controlling for a wide range of common performance measures. At the same time, streaks have limited predictive power regarding future fund performance. This suggests investors weigh information suboptimally, and their decisions are driven too strongly by a belief in continuation of good performance, consistent with the “hot hand fallacy.” The hedge funds that investors choose to invest in do not perform significantly better than those they divest from. These findings are consistent with overreaction to certain types of information and do not support the notion that sophisticated investors have superior information or superior information processing abilities. This paper was accepted by David Simchi-Levi, finance.

Star Rating, Fund Flows and Performance Predictability - Evidence from Norway

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linn K. Aasheim ◽  
Antonio Freitas Miguel ◽  
Sofia Brito Ramos
Keyword(s):  
Fund Flows ◽  
Star Rating ◽  
And Performance

scholarly journals HEDGE FUNDS: RISK AND PERFORMANCE

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. 1850003
Author(s):  
SANGHEON SHIN ◽  
JAN SMOLARSKI ◽  
GÖKÇE SOYDEMIR
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hedge Funds ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Hedge Fund ◽  
Investment Strategy ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Asset Class ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Fund Portfolio

This paper models hedge fund exposure to risk factors and examines time-varying performance of hedge funds. From existing models such as asset-based style (ABS)-factor model, standard asset class (SAC)-factor model, and four-factor model, we extract the best six factors for each hedge fund portfolio by investment strategy. Then, we find combinations of risk factors that explain most of the variance in performance of each hedge fund portfolio based on investment strategy. The results show instability of coefficients in the performance attribution regression. Incorporating a time-varying factor exposure feature would be the best way to measure hedge fund performance. Furthermore, the optimal models with fewer factors exhibit greater explanatory power than existing models. Using rolling regressions, our customized investment strategy model shows how hedge funds are sensitive to risk factors according to market conditions.

scholarly journals Governance under the Gun: Spillover Effects of Hedge Fund Activism*

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1031-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nickolay Gantchev ◽  
Oleg R Gredil ◽  
Chotibhak Jotikasthira
Keyword(s):  
Hedge Fund ◽  
Spillover Effects ◽  
Threat Perception ◽  
Capital Expenditures ◽  
Return On Assets ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Asset Turnover ◽  
Hedge Fund Activism ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Industry Conditions

Abstract Hedge fund activism is associated with improvements in the governance and performance of targeted firms. In this article, we show that these positive effects of activism reach beyond the targets, as nontargeted peers make similar improvements under the threat of activism. Peers with higher threat perception, as measured by director connections to past targets, are more likely to increase leverage and payout, decrease capital expenditures and cash, and improve return on assets and asset turnover. As a result, their valuations improve, and their probability of being targeted declines. Our results are not explained by time-varying industry conditions or competition effects whereby improved targets force their product market rivals to become more competitive.

Innovative Enterprise Solves the Agency Problem

2019 ◽  
pp. 156-191
Author(s):  
William Lazonick ◽  
Jang-Sup Shin
Keyword(s):  
Agency Theory ◽  
Hedge Fund ◽  
Innovation Theory ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Business Corporation ◽  
Innovative Enterprise ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Short Termism ◽  
The U.S

This chapter uses innovation theory to provide both a general theoretical critique and a selective empirical critique of the use of agency theory to rationalize the looting of the U.S. business corporation as enhancing economic efficiency. It focuses on three empirical works, Bebchuk and Fried, Pay Without Performance (2004); Bebchuk, Brav, and Jiang, “The Long-Term Effects of Hedge-Fund Activism” (2015); and Fried and Wang, “Short-Termism and Capital Flows” (2017). The chapter contends that MSV ideology as promulgated by agency theorists has contributed to inferior corporate and economic performance. It then argues that, for analyzing the operation and performance of the economy, innovation theory should replace agency theory.

Fund Flow Volatility and Performance

2009 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 223-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Rakowski
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Fund ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Fund Flows ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Fund Flow ◽  
Performance Differences ◽  
Significant Negative Relationship ◽  
Equity Funds ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Impact

AbstractThis paper provides a detailed analysis of the impact of daily mutual fund flow volatility on fund performance. I document a significant negative relationship between the volatility of daily fund flows and cross-sectional differences in risk-adjusted performance. This relationship is driven by domestic equity funds, as well as small funds, well-performing funds, and funds that experience inflows over the sample period. My results are consistent with performance differences arising from the transaction costs of nondiscretionary trading driven by daily fund flows, but not with performance differences arising from the suboptimal cash holdings that arise from fund flows.

The Life Cycle of Hedge Funds: Fund Flows, Size, Competition, and Performance

2012 ◽  
Vol 02 (01) ◽  
pp. 1250003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mila Getmansky
Keyword(s):  
Hedge Funds ◽  
Fund Performance ◽  
Life Cycles ◽  
Fund Flows ◽  
Optimal Size ◽  
Market Impact ◽  
Specific Factors ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Capacity Constrained ◽  
Asset Size

This paper analyzes the life cycles of hedge funds. Using the Lipper TASS database it provides category and fund specific factors that affect the survival probability of hedge funds. The findings show that in general, investors chasing individual fund performance, thus increasing fund flows, decrease probabilities of hedge funds liquidating. However, if investors chase a category of hedge funds that has performed well (favorably positioned), then the probability of hedge funds liquidating in this category increases. We interpret this finding as a result of competition among hedge funds in a category. As competition increases, marginal funds are more likely to be liquidated than funds that deliver superior risk-adjusted returns. We also find that there is a concave relationship between performance and lagged assets under management. The implication of this study is that an optimal asset size can be obtained by balancing out the effects of past returns, fund flows, competition, market impact, and favorable category positioning that are modeled in the paper. Hedge funds in capacity constrained and illiquid categories are subject to high market impact, have limited investment opportunities, and are likely to exhibit an optimal size behavior.

scholarly journals Why do Fund Managers Increase the Lottery-Like Characteristics of the Fund?

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 557-592
Author(s):  
Minyeon Han ◽  
Hyoung-goo Kang ◽  
Kyoung Hun Bae
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Funds ◽  
Fund Flows ◽  
Fund Managers ◽  
And Performance

We investigate why fund managers invest in lottery-like stocks and whether the behavior that holds more lottery-like stocks affects performance. First, mutual funds that hold more lottery stocks may attract more fund flows. Our results support the theory that fund managers invest more in lottery-like stocks to reflect investors' preferences for extreme payoffs. Second, the level of lottery-like characteristics of mutual funds does not predict managers’ skill and performance. Therefore, fund managers holding more lottery stocks is not a result of managers’ skills. Third, lottery-like characteristics of mutual funds do not significantly affect performance in specific reporting periods (e.g., year-end or quarter-end). Based on this result, we conclude that fund managers do not invest more in lottery stocks to advance their career.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document