APEC : APECC (APEC Economic Integration and Rules of Origin: Economic Impacts and Policy Implications)

Author(s):  
Sangkyom Kim ◽  
Kyung Soo Lim
2020 ◽  
pp. 097491012097480
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ibrahim Shah

Regional economic integration is the key to achieving prosperity and stability. However, intra-regional trade in South Asia accounts for not more than 5%–6% of their total trade. This study aims to examine the role played by regional economic integration in determining the economic growth of South Asian countries over the period 1980–2015. Since shocks in one country may affect another country in the region, this is taken into account in the article by employing methodologies that are robust to cross sectional dependence. Specifically, continuously-updated and bias-corrected (CupBC) of Bai et al. (2009) and Dumitrescu–Hurlin panel causality test (2012) have been employed to estimate long-run coefficients and determine the direction of relationship among the variables, respectively. The findings suggest that economic integration increases economic growth significantly in this region. However, contrary to popular belief, both democracy and human capital are negatively related to economic growth. Bidirectional causality is found between economic integration and democracy, regional integration and human capital, democracy and human capital and, democracy and labor. This study also presents several policy implications for South Asian countries.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Young Lee ◽  
Sherzod Shadikhodjaev ◽  
Soonchan Park ◽  
jeeyoung hwang

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arcadia Trvalik ◽  
Sammie Trvalik ◽  
David F. Goldsmith ◽  
Mary O'reilly

Author(s):  
Kazunobu Hayakawa ◽  
Nuttawut Laksanapanyakul ◽  
Taiyo Yoshimi

Abstract This paper examines the determinants of the probability that an exporter chooses between a most-favored nation (MFN) scheme and multiple regional trade agreement (RTA) schemes. We estimate a discrete choice model using transaction-level import data for Thailand in 2014. We find that RTA schemes are more likely to be chosen, given a larger transaction value. Among RTA schemes, the ones with less restrictive rules of origin or lower tariff rates are more likely to be selected. We also conduct simulation analysis to provide quantitative policy implications.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 340-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Xie ◽  
Tariq Ali ◽  
Qi Cui ◽  
Jikun Huang

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the potential economic impacts of China’s insect-resistant GM maize and provide new evidence for decision making concerning its commercialization. Design/methodology/approach This study uses data drawn from the production trials of insect-resistant GM maize and expert interviews to determine the impacts of commercializing GM maize at farm level under three scenarios with varying severity of insect pest attacks in maize production. Economic impacts are simulated using a modified Global Trade Analysis Project model. Findings In farm terms, insect-resistant GM maize increases crop yield and reduces both pesticide and labor inputs. In national terms, China can increase its GDP by USD8.6 billion and maize self-sufficiency by about 2 percent given normal insect pest attacks if China commercializes GM maize. Additional beneficiaries include consumers and the livestock industry. Non-maize crops can also benefit from land saving through GM maize commercialization. Chemical is a sector with the decrease in its output because demand for pesticides will fall. Originality/value Although China has announced a roadmap for commercializing GM crops for use as feed and in processing after nearly two decades of producing GM cotton, no clear timetable for producing GM maize as feed has been established due to several concerns, including the potential for economic gains from GM maize. This study is the first to assess the economic impacts of commercializing China’s GM maize. The findings should have significant policy implications for the development and commercialization of GM crops in general and GM maize in particular.


2004 ◽  
Vol 2004 (55) ◽  
pp. 201-202
Author(s):  
Jota Ishikawa ◽  
Yoshihiro Mizoguchi ◽  
Hiroshi Mukunoki

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document