Are the Effects of Monetary Policy Shocks in the US Different During Financial Crises? - A Threshold VAR Approach

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmine Zheng
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Toyoichiro Shirota

Abstract This study empirically examines whether shock size matters for the US monetary policy effects. Using a nonlinear local projection method, I find that large monetary policy shocks are less powerful than smaller monetary policy shocks, with the information effect being the potential source of the observed asymmetry in monetary policy efficacy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 2776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rangan Gupta ◽  
Zhihui Lv ◽  
Wing-Keung Wong

Unlike the existing literature, which primarily studies the impact of only monetary policy shocks on real estate investment trusts (REITs), this paper develops a change-point vector autoregressive (VAR) model and then analyzes, for the first time, regime-specific impact of demand, supply, monetary policy, and spread yield shocks, identified using sign-restrictions, on US REITs returns. The model first isolates four major macroeconomic regimes in the US since the 1970s and discloses important changes to the statistical properties of REITs returns and its responses to the identified shocks. A variance decomposition analysis revealed aggregate supply shocks to have dominated in the early part of the sample period, and monetary policy and spread shocks at the end. Our results imply that ignoring other possible shocks in the model is likely to lead to incorrect inferences, and over-reliance on (conventional) monetary policy in correcting for possible bubbles in the REITs sector, which it will fail to rectify, given the importance of other shocks driving the REITs sector.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 43-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvana Tenreyro ◽  
Gregory Thwaites

We investigate how the response of the US economy to monetary policy shocks depends on the state of the business cycle. The effects of monetary policy are less powerful in recessions, especially for durables expenditure and business investment. The asymmetry relates to how fast the economy is growing, rather than to the level of resource utilization. There is some evidence that fiscal policy has counteracted monetary policy in recessions but reinforced it in booms. We also find evidence that contractionary policy shocks are more powerful than expansionary shocks, but contractionary shocks have not been more common in booms. So this asymmetry cannot explain our main finding. (JEL E21, E22, E32, E52)


2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 227-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN W. KEATING ◽  
LOGAN J. KELLY ◽  
A. LEE SMITH ◽  
VICTOR J. VALCARCEL

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (026) ◽  
pp. 1-79
Author(s):  
Juan M. Morelli ◽  

This paper studies how the rise in US households' participation in equity markets affects the transmission of macroeconomic shocks to the economy. I embed limited participation into a New Keynesian framework for the US economy to analyze the individual and aggregate effects of higher participation. I derive three main results. First, participants are relatively more responsive to shocks than nonparticipants. Second, higher participation reduces the effectiveness of monetary policy. Third, with higher participation the economy becomes less volatile. I contrast key predictions of my model with new micro-level empirical evidence on the response of consumption to monetary policy shocks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document