Proximate Preferences and Almost Full Revelation in the Crawford-Sobel Game

Author(s):  
Murali K. Agastya ◽  
Parimal K. Bag ◽  
Indranil Chakraborty
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murali Agastya ◽  
Parimal Kanti Bag ◽  
Indranil Chakraborty
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (2/3) ◽  
Author(s):  
P.B. Decock

This article explores Origen’s approach to interpreting John’s Gospel as can be seen in the introduction to his commentary. It deals with the points which were usually discussed in the introductions to Aristotle and Plato. It was this educational aim of the philosophical tradition that was Origen’s chief concern in commenting on the Scriptures; an aim which was not seen as merely becoming skilled or well-informed. Rather, it was about developing in virtue, in wisdom, in conversion to the Good (Plato); or as Origen understood it, development in love for God. Origen perceived the development of love for God in three basic steps: moral purification, by which the person is enabled to appreciate moral values; enlightenment, by which the person recognises God as the supreme and absolute value; and finally, union with God in love, which is never fully achieved in this life. The New Testament together with the Old Testament (understood in the light of the New Testament), reveals the power of the Gospel “in mirror darkly” while the “eternal gospel” will be the full revelation of it at the eschaton. John’s Gospel is the clearest expression of the divine Logos; but no one can understand the text fully as expression of the Logos unless one becomes like John – who was intimately related to the Logos, as the Logos is related to the Father (John 13:23, 25; 1:18).


2019 ◽  
Vol 176 ◽  
pp. 14-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Schopohl
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 273-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tavy Ronen ◽  
Varda (Lewinstein) Yaari

We challenge the popular view that because of the revelation principle, the research on earnings management must be restricted only to situations in which a truth-telling, fully revealing equilibrium/i> does not exist. After presenting and discussing the revelation principle, we state conditions under which truth-telling equilibria may be dominated by equilibria wherein the message (such as earnings) is managed. The optimal message in an undominated equilibrium may involve either partial suppression of information (omission of some data) or aggregation (summarization of data).


Author(s):  
Henry James
Keyword(s):  
Know How ◽  

They went at last, the wiseheads, down to Poynton, where the palpitating girl had the full revelation. ‘Now do you know how I feel?’ Mrs Gereth asked when in the wondrous hall, three minutes after their arrival, her pretty associate dropped on...


2008 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 864-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Morgan ◽  
Phillip C Stocken

We study information transmission via polling. A policymaker polls constituents, who differ in their information and ideology, to determine policy. Full revelation is an equilibrium in a poll with a small sample, but not with a large one. In large polls, full information aggregation can arise in an equilibrium where constituents endogenously sort themselves into centrists, who respond truthfully, and extremists, who do not. We find polling statistics that ignore strategic behavior yield biased estimators and mischaracterize the poll's margin of error. We construct estimators that account for strategic behavior. Finally, we compare polls and elections. (JEL C42, D83)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document