Pay for Creativity? The Complementarity between Individual Rewards and Subjective Evaluations in Incentive System Design

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabella Grabner
Author(s):  
Niklas Kreilkamp ◽  
Sascha Matanovic ◽  
Maximilian Schmidt ◽  
Arnt Wöhrmann

2012 ◽  
pp. 4-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Yakovlev

The paper considers the factors explaining violent pressure of law enforcement agencies on businessmen in Russia in recent years. This phenomenon has been analyzed from the viewpoint of “destructive entrepreneurship” concept (Baumol, 1990) and “limited access order” framework (North et al., 2009). The paper stresses the key role of economic and political organizations in defending entrepreneurs’ interests. It proposes a number of policy recommendations on incentive system design for law enforcement agencies and development of their public communications with business and civil society organizations.


2014 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 1729-1750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabella Grabner

ABSTRACT I empirically investigate the impact of an organization's creativity dependency on the design of its incentive system. In firms for which the primary source of value creation is the creativity of core employees, the designs of incentive systems are particularly challenging. The nature of creative work constrains the feasibility of extrinsic incentives, but at the same time creates a need for them. Accordingly, there is concern that the use of incentives renders people not creative enough, but a lack of incentives makes employees “too creative.” I argue that a solution to this dilemma is the acknowledgment that the decision to use performance-based pay is not made in isolation, but as part of a set of complementary choices. I theoretically argue and empirically show that subjective evaluations of non-task-related performance and performance-based pay are complements in a creativity-dependent setting. I further argue that the intense use of both control mechanisms is the incentive system that best accommodates the control requirements of creativity-dependent firms, and show that the likelihood of choosing this system increases with the creativity dependency.


2009 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
MICHAEL J. GIBBS ◽  
KENNETH A. MERCHANT ◽  
WIM A. VAN DER STEDE ◽  
MARK E. VARGUS

Author(s):  
Katlijn Haesebrouck ◽  
Alexandra Van den Abbeele ◽  
Michael G. Williamson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document