Corporate Governance Changes Following Reputational Damage in the Financial Industry

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Barakat
2002 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Craig ◽  
Ken Moores

This paper examines a second-generation family business that recently introduced professional corporate governance structures to its organization. The paper includes an outline of the company and an in-depth interview with the second-generation family member who was responsible for the process. Advice to those who are considering corporate governance changes to their family business appears throughout the interview.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evi Oktavia

The purpose of this research is to explain an empirical evidence about the effect of GoodCorporate Governance (GCG) mechanism and leverage on financial performance, and definewhich of the most important variables having powerful impact on the firm financial performance.Good Corporate Governance mechanism measured by using board gender, board of directors,board of commissioner, audit committee, and institutional ownership variables. Leveragemeasured by using Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) variable, while financial performance measuredby using Return on Equity (ROE) variable. This research is using secondary data, such as thefinancial report, idx statistic report, and other related information of financial industry listed inIndonesia Stock Exchange for the period of 2011 to 2015. The sample used in this research were23 companies which selected by using purposive sampling method. In this study, panel dataregression methods have been conducted to explain the effect of GCG and leverage on the firmfinancial performance.The results show that board gender has a positive and significant effect on the firmfinancial performance. Meanwhile, boards of directors, board of commissioner, audit committeeand leverage haveno significant effect on the firm financial performance. Moreover, institutionalownership has a positive effect and no significant on the firm financial performance.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 687-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles P. Cullinan ◽  
Lois S. Mahoney ◽  
Pamela Roush

Purpose This paper examines whether shareholders consider corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance when voting on corporate governance change proposals submitted by dissident shareholders. These proposals recommend changes to the corporate governance status quo and are made by dissident shareholders who are dissatisfied with the company’s existing governance practices. Design/methodology/approach Using 195 governance change proposals voted on during 2013, the paper examines the relationship between CSR performance (obtained from the MSCI database) and the level of voting support for these proposals. Findings This study finds that shareholder support for corporate governance change proposals submitted by dissident shareholders is positively related to firms’ CSR concerns, especially environmental concerns. Research limitations/implications The findings suggest that shareholders may be concerned with the potentially adverse effects of weak CSR performance, especially poor environmental performance, and may support changes to corporate governance structures when a company’s CSR and environmental performance is weaker. Originality/value As the first research to examine the relationship between CSR and proposed changes to corporate governance, this study provides unique insights into shareholder perceptions of the value of CSR based on shareholders’ support (or lack thereof) for governance changes proposed by dissident shareholders.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 8233
Author(s):  
David Castillo-Merino ◽  
Gonzalo Rodríguez-Pérez

This paper examines the determinants of sustainability performance in the financial industry at the firm, country and legal origin levels. Through the analysis of the ESG score in a sample of 64 countries with 982 financial firms during the period between 2002 and 2018, we find that legal origin is a significant explanatory variable. In particular, our findings indicate that companies based in civil-law countries show higher values of ESG performance than their counterparts in common-law countries, suggesting the prevalence of the stakeholder theory in explaining the willingness of financial firms to engage in sustainability practices. Moreover, and following the assumptions of the “good governance” view, we also assess the joint the effect of corporate governance and legal origin ESG scores, finding that corporate governance structures emerge as a substitution mechanism of sustainability enhancement for financial firms based in common-law countries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document