scholarly journals The Strategies of Muslim Family Law Reform

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Stilt ◽  
Swathi Gandhavadi Griffin
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 449-479
Author(s):  
Sridevi Thambapillay

The Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 (LRA) which was passed in 1976 and came into force on 1st March 1982, standardized the laws concerning non-Muslim family matters. Many family issues concerning non-Muslim have emerged ever since, the most important being the effects of unilateral conversion to Islam by one of the parties to the marriage. There has been a lot of public hue and cry for amendments to be made to the LRA. After much deliberation, the Malaysian Parliament finally passed the amendments to the LRA in October 2017, which came into force in December 2018. Although the amendments have addressed selected family law issues, the most important amendment on child custody in a unilateral conversion to Islam was dropped from the Bill at the last minute. Howsoever, at the end of the day, the real question that needs to be addressed is whether the amendments have resolved the major issues that have arisen over the past four decades? Hence, the purpose of this article is as follows: first, to examine the brief background to the passing of the LRA, secondly, to analyse the 2017 amendments, thirdly, to identify the weaknesses that still exist in the LRA, and finally, to suggest recommendations to overcome these weaknesses by comparing the Malaysian position with the Singaporean position. In conclusion, it is submitted that despite the recent amendments to the LRA, much needs to be done to overcome all the remaining issues that have still not been addressed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-104
Author(s):  
Nadia Sonneveld

To what extent have notions of manhood and womanhood as incorporated in Egyptian Muslim family law changed over the course of almost a century of family law reforms, and why? In answering this question, I draw on the works of two Egyptian intellectuals, Qasim Amin and Azza Heikal, because they discussed ideas about manhood and womanhood in relation to Islamic religion and authoritarian rule. My analysis shows that there is a dire need within studies on gender in the Middle East to assess the effectiveness of family law reform on both women’s and men’s agency. After all, when an authoritarian government introduces legislation that enhances women’s legal rights with regard to the family but does not reform men’s legal rights inside that same family, it is not surprising that when political oppression ends, disenfranchised men will try to abolish the laws that expanded their wives’ freedom and curtailed theirs.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Ihab Habudin

Muslim family law has evolved both in methods and legal materials. Muslim family law , which was originally contained in the books of fiqh, developed into the form of legislation. The development is accompanied by wearing various methods of Islamic family law reform. However, for some people, there has been an update that is not enough. Khoiruddin Nasution, a professor at UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, said that the Islamic family law needs to be used thematic - holistic methods. This article seeks to discuss the bid Khoiruddin and see its application in cases of Islamic family law. [Hukum keluarga Muslim telah mengalami perkembangan baik secara metode maupun materi hukumnya. Hukum keluarga Muslim, yang pada awalnya terdapat dalam kitab-kitab fikih, dikembangkan ke dalam bentuk perundang-undangan. Perkembangan tersebut diiringi dengan dipakainya berbagai metode pembaruan hukum keluarga Islam. Namun, bagi sebagian kalangan, pembaruan yang telah ada belumlah cukup. Khoiruddin Nasution, seorang guru besar di UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, menyebutkan bahwa dalam hukum keluarga Islam perlu dipakai metode tematik-holistik. Artikel ini berusaha membahas tawaran Khoiruddin tersebut serta melihat aplikasinya dalam kasus-kasus hukum keluarga Islam.]


Author(s):  
Robert Leckey

Through the narrow entry of property disputes between former cohabitants, this chapter aims to clarify thinking on issues crucial to philosophical examination of family law. It refracts big questions—such as what cohabitants should owe one another and the balance between choice and protection—through a legal lens of attention to institutional matters such as the roles of judges and legislatures. Canadian cases on unjust enrichment and English cases quantifying beneficial interests in a jointly owned home are examples. The chapter highlights limits on judicial law reform in the face of social change, both in substance and in the capacity to acknowledge the state's interest in intimate relationships. The chapter relativizes the focus on choice prominent in academic and policy discussions of cohabitation and highlights the character of family law, entwined with the general private law of property and obligations, as a regulatory system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-65
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Nössing

AbstractThis article discusses the new divorce on grounds of discord procedure (taṭlīq li-š-šiqāq) within the context of the Moroccan family law reform of 2004. Literature available in English and French has, so far, focused primarily on the improvements the Moroccan family law reform has brought in regard to women’s rights. The reform is considered one of the most progressive legislative projects in the MENA region and a milestone for gender equality, notably the reform of divorce law. Divorce on grounds of discord was seen as the long-awaited divorce guarantee for women. However, legal scholars maintained that case law jeopardised the divorce guarantee. This legal-anthropological study is informed by fieldwork at the family court in Rabat, as well as official statistics, case law and the standard legal commentary. It aims to scrutinise how divorce on grounds of divorce is put into practice by the judiciary, how Moroccan men and women make use of it and how changes on a procedural and institutional level affect the implementation of the new divorce procedure. My empirical findings show that divorce on grounds of discord effectively guarantees Moroccan women’s right to divorce. Well beyond the discussion on women’s rights in divorce, I will demonstrate that, within a decade, divorce on grounds of discord developed into a standard divorce procedure for both men and women across socio-economical milieus and age groups.


1982 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 389
Author(s):  
Mounira Charrad ◽  
John L. Esposito
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document