scholarly journals MENIMBANG METODE TEMATIK-HOLISTIK DALAM PEMBARUAN HUKUM KELUARGA MUSLIM (Telaah Pemikiran Khoiruddin Nasution)

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Ihab Habudin

Muslim family law has evolved both in methods and legal materials. Muslim family law , which was originally contained in the books of fiqh, developed into the form of legislation. The development is accompanied by wearing various methods of Islamic family law reform. However, for some people, there has been an update that is not enough. Khoiruddin Nasution, a professor at UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, said that the Islamic family law needs to be used thematic - holistic methods. This article seeks to discuss the bid Khoiruddin and see its application in cases of Islamic family law. [Hukum keluarga Muslim telah mengalami perkembangan baik secara metode maupun materi hukumnya. Hukum keluarga Muslim, yang pada awalnya terdapat dalam kitab-kitab fikih, dikembangkan ke dalam bentuk perundang-undangan. Perkembangan tersebut diiringi dengan dipakainya berbagai metode pembaruan hukum keluarga Islam. Namun, bagi sebagian kalangan, pembaruan yang telah ada belumlah cukup. Khoiruddin Nasution, seorang guru besar di UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, menyebutkan bahwa dalam hukum keluarga Islam perlu dipakai metode tematik-holistik. Artikel ini berusaha membahas tawaran Khoiruddin tersebut serta melihat aplikasinya dalam kasus-kasus hukum keluarga Islam.]

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 449-479
Author(s):  
Sridevi Thambapillay

The Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 (LRA) which was passed in 1976 and came into force on 1st March 1982, standardized the laws concerning non-Muslim family matters. Many family issues concerning non-Muslim have emerged ever since, the most important being the effects of unilateral conversion to Islam by one of the parties to the marriage. There has been a lot of public hue and cry for amendments to be made to the LRA. After much deliberation, the Malaysian Parliament finally passed the amendments to the LRA in October 2017, which came into force in December 2018. Although the amendments have addressed selected family law issues, the most important amendment on child custody in a unilateral conversion to Islam was dropped from the Bill at the last minute. Howsoever, at the end of the day, the real question that needs to be addressed is whether the amendments have resolved the major issues that have arisen over the past four decades? Hence, the purpose of this article is as follows: first, to examine the brief background to the passing of the LRA, secondly, to analyse the 2017 amendments, thirdly, to identify the weaknesses that still exist in the LRA, and finally, to suggest recommendations to overcome these weaknesses by comparing the Malaysian position with the Singaporean position. In conclusion, it is submitted that despite the recent amendments to the LRA, much needs to be done to overcome all the remaining issues that have still not been addressed.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Stilt ◽  
Swathi Gandhavadi Griffin
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ahmad Bunyan Wahib

This article discusses about the history and the development of family law reform in Muslim countries.This work has taken a lot benefits from Anderson’s works on Islamic law in the Muslim world for bothdata and perspective. Islamic family law reform started from the second decade of twentieth century(1915) with the issuance of two Ottoman Caliph decrees on wife rights to ask religious court to divorcethem from their husband. This reform was followed by Sudan (starting from 1916), Egypt (1920),Jordan (1951), Syria (1953), Tunisia (1956/1959), Morocco (1958), Iraq (1959), Pakistan (1961) and Iran(1967). The reformation aims to administrate the members of community in the filed of social,economy, politics, and law. From the perspective of modernization, Islamic family law reform inMuslim countries has shown the process of modernization from above.


ICR Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-274
Author(s):  
Mohamed Azam Mohamed Adil

Child custody refers to the upbringing of a child, including the parental responsibility to provide protection, love, care, education, shelter and management. Generally, in determining who will be the legal custodian of a child, a court will first and foremost ensure that the child’s welfare is well-protected.  In Malaysia, child custody is governed by two separate laws, one for non- Muslims and one for Muslims. For non-Muslims, the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act of 1976 (Act 164) holds sway, while for Muslims it is either the Islamic Family Law Enactments of the respective states or the Islamic Family Law Act of the Federal Territories that are relevant. While the Malaysian civil court operates over the non-Muslim laws, the Syariah court operates over the Muslim ones.  


ICR Journal ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-52
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hashim Kamali

This Special Issue of Islam and Civilisational Renewal carries selected papers from the ‘International Conference on the Family Institution in the Twenty-First Century: Ideals and Realities’, held at IAIS Malaysia on 13-14 December 2010. The event was jointly organised by IAIS Malaysia, the Institute of Islamic Understanding Malaysia (IKIM), Yayasan Pendidikan Islam (YPI), Yayasan Ubaidi, the Journalists and Writers Foundation, Istanbul, Turkey, the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), and the Malaysian Turkish Dialogue Society, and officiated by Senator Dato, Sri Sharizat Abdul Jalil, Malaysia’s Minister of Women, Family and Community Development.  


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-124
Author(s):  
Mohammad Fauzan Ni'ami

Tulisan kali ini mengupas alasan penolakan masyarakat Pakistan, Afghanistan, dan Indonesia. Menggambarkan alasan penolakan masyarakat atas lahirnya reformasi hukum keluarga Islam, dengan didahului uraian historitas pro-kontra reformasi Hukum keluarga pada ketiga negara tersebut. Hasil tulisan ini menunjukan terdapat relevansi antara alasan penolakan umat atas risalah kenabian dengan alasan penolakan masyarakat atas reformasi hukum keluarga Islam. Relevansi yang ditemukan adalah keduanya menolak perubahan (ideas movement), dan hanya ingin mempertahankan nilai kemapanan. (This article explores the reasons for the people of Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Indonesia. The people's reasons for reforming Islamic family law explain the historical pros and cons of Drawing Family Law in the three countries. The results of this paper indicate a relevance between the reasons for rejecting the prophetic message and the reasons for the users of Islamic family law reform. The relevance found is that both resist change (idea movement) and only want to maintain established values.)


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-87
Author(s):  
Arif Sugitanata ◽  
Suud Sarim Karimullah ◽  
Mohamad Sobrun Jamil

This article discusses the products of Islamic family law in Turkey with the main focus of this article review is how the history and development of family law in Turkey and what are the products of family law reform in Turkey using literature studies. This paper finds that the development of family law reform in Turkey starting from al-Majallâh (1876), The Ottoman Law of Family Right (1917), Turkish Civil Code (The Turkish Civil Code of 1926) is a response to the influence and changes in social conditions. , politics, and an unstable economy, especially at that time the Turkish people were still experiencing an identity crisis. Then the product of family law reform in Turkey is divided into two scopes, namely munakahat and Mawaris, where part of the munakahat itself includes, khitbah, minimum age limit for marriage, prohibitions in marriage, polygamy, walimah, marriage annulment, marriage that is not legalized, divorce. , compensation in divorce, while in Mawaris includes, wills and the amount of distribution between men and women are equal. Abstrak Artikel ini membahas tentang produk-produk hukum keluarga Islam di Turki dengan fokus utama kajian artikel ini adalah bagaimana sejarah dan perkembangan hukum keluarga di Turki dan apa saja produk dari pembaharuan hukum keluarga di Turki menggunakan studi kepustakaan. Tulisan ini menemukan bahwa perkembangan pembaharuan hukum keluarga di Turki yang dimulai dari al-Majallâh (1876), The Ottoman Law of Family Right (1917), Peraturan Sipil Turki (The Turkish Civil Code of 1926) merupakan sebuah respon atas pengaruh dan perubahan kondisi sosial, politik, dan ekonomi yang tidak stabil apalagi pada masa tersebut masyarakat Turki masih mengalami kondisi krisis identitas. Kemudian produk dari pembaharuan hukum keluarga di Turki dibagi kedalam dua cakupan yakni munakahat dan mawaris, di mana bagian dari munakahat itu sendiri meliputi, khitbah, batas usia minimal menikah, larangan dalam perkawinan, poligami, walimah, pembatalan perkawinan, perkawinan yang tidak disahkan, perceraian, kompensasi dalam perceraian, Sedangkan dalam mawaris meliputi, wasiat dan jumlah pembagian antara laki-laki dan perempuan yang setara.


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhibbuthabry Muhibbuthabry

One of the interesting themes of Islamic family law reform is the legal status of polygamy. Almost all Muslim countries make efforts to narrow the space for the practice of polygamy by providing sanctions for the doers, including Tunisia, Pakistan, Egypt, Syria, Malaysia, and Indonesia. This article tries to discuss and analyze this case by making a comparison between the laws of family law in some countries—such as Tunisia, Pakistan, Egypt, Syria, Malaysia, and Indonesia—and the concept of classical fiqh. The study shows that even though each of these countries has the same spirit of renewal, they practice different reform issues related to polygamy. It can be clearly seen in the diversity of forms of sanctions for the doers of polygamy.DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v16i1.2891


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-104
Author(s):  
Nadia Sonneveld

To what extent have notions of manhood and womanhood as incorporated in Egyptian Muslim family law changed over the course of almost a century of family law reforms, and why? In answering this question, I draw on the works of two Egyptian intellectuals, Qasim Amin and Azza Heikal, because they discussed ideas about manhood and womanhood in relation to Islamic religion and authoritarian rule. My analysis shows that there is a dire need within studies on gender in the Middle East to assess the effectiveness of family law reform on both women’s and men’s agency. After all, when an authoritarian government introduces legislation that enhances women’s legal rights with regard to the family but does not reform men’s legal rights inside that same family, it is not surprising that when political oppression ends, disenfranchised men will try to abolish the laws that expanded their wives’ freedom and curtailed theirs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document