Is the Cross-Listing Premium an SEO Effect?

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanitha Ragunathan ◽  
Peter Clarkson ◽  
John Nowland
Keyword(s):  
Cross Listing ◽  
The Cross

Cross-listing of real estate investment trusts (REITs)

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 509-527
Author(s):  
Kim Hin David Ho ◽  
Kwame Addae-Dapaah ◽  
Fang Rui Lina Peck
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Foreign Market ◽  
Real Estate Investment Trusts ◽  
Domestic Market ◽  
Risk Exposure ◽  
Real Estate Investment ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Cross Listing ◽  
Market Beta ◽  
The Cross

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the common stock price reaction and the changes to the risk exposure of the cross-listing for real estate investment trusts (REITs). Design/methodology/approach The paper adopts the event study methodology to assess the abnormal returns (ARs). Pre- and post-cross-listing changes in the risk exposure for the domestic and foreign markets are examined, via a modified two-factor international asset pricing model. A comparison is made for two broad cross-listings, namely, the depositary receipts and the dual ordinary listings, to examine the impacts from institutional differences. Findings Cross-listed REITs generally experience positive and significant ARs throughout the event window, implying significant superior returns associated with the cross-listing for REITs. On systematic risks, REITs exhibit significant decline in their domestic market β coefficients after the cross-listing. However, the foreign market β coefficients do not yield conclusive evidence when compared across the sample. Research limitations/implications Results are consistent with prudential asset allocation for potential diversification gains from the cross-listing, as the reduction from the domestic market beta is more significant than changes in the foreign market beta. Practical implications The results and findings should incentivise REIT managers to explore viable cross-listing. Social implications Such cross-listing for REITs should enhance risk diversification. Originality/value This is a pioneer study on cross-listing of REITs. It provides a basis for investment decision making, and could provoke further research and discussion.

Cross-Listing Audit Fee Premiums: Theory and Evidence

2009 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 1429-1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong-Hag Choi ◽  
Jeong-Bon Kim ◽  
Xiaohong Liu ◽  
Dan A. Simunic
Keyword(s):  
Home Country ◽  
Audit Fees ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Cross Listing ◽  
Audit Fee ◽  
Legal Regimes ◽  
Cross Country ◽  
The Cross ◽  
The Difference

ABSTRACT: We study the effects of cross-listings on audit fees. We first develop a model in which legal environments play a crucial role in determining the auditor's legal liability. Our model and analysis predict that auditors charge higher fees for firms that are cross-listed in countries with stronger legal regimes than they do for non-cross-listed firms and that the cross-listing audit fee premium increases with the difference in the strength of legal regimes between the cross-listed foreign country and the home country. We then empirically test these predictions. The results of our cross-country regressions strongly support our predictions. In addition, we find no significant cross-listing fee premium for firms that are cross-listed in countries whose legal regimes are. no stronger than those of their home countries. This suggests that cross-listing audit fee premiums are associated with increased legal liability and not with increased audit complexity per se. Our findings help explain why cross-listing premiums occur and what determines their magnitude.

scholarly journals The Effect Of Cross Listing On The Accounting Quality Of Firms Cross Listed In East African Markets

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 403
Author(s):  
Emmah W. Ndirangu ◽  
Cyrus Iraya
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
East Africa ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Quality Metrics ◽  
Accounting Quality ◽  
East African ◽  
Cross Listing ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Timely Loss Recognition

Cross listing has been identified as a determinant of accounting quality. Prior empirical studies have differed on the effect of cross listing on accounting quality in different jurisdictions. The study of accounting quality in East Africa has however not incorporated the possible effect of cross listing. This research study sought to establish the effect that cross listing may have on the accounting quality of firms cross listed in East African stock exchanges. The study looked at three accounting quality metrics of firms cross listed in East Africa, namely, earnings management, timely loss recognition and value relevance of accounting information. The earnings management model used was the Lang, Raedy and Yetman (2003) earnings smoothing model. Timely loss recognition was investigated using the Basu (1997) model while value relevance was tested using the Lang, Raedy and Yetman (2003) model. These metrics were tested for differences during a three year period prior to cross listing and a three year period after cross listing. Accounting quality metrics for a total of six cross listed East African companies were analyzed. This study shows that earnings management did not occur around the cross listing dates. The value relevance of information presented by the cross listed firms did not change significantly, meaning that the ability of the summary accounting measures to accurately reflect the underlying economic value of the firms studied still remained as before the cross listing. There was no significant effect in terms of timely loss recognition in light of bad news and no indication of better prudence in the reporting of good news. The study finds that cross listing does not have an effect on the quality of reporting of firms cross listed within the East African Securities Exchanges.

The Cross-Listing and Cross-Trading of German Companies in the U.S. and of Foreign Companies in Germany

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 58-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Bessler ◽  
Fred R. Kaen ◽  
Colin Schneck
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Companies ◽  
Cross Listing ◽  
The Cross ◽  
The U.S

scholarly journals Cross-listing and corporate governance: Bonding or avoiding?

2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 36-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir N. Licht
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Foreign Firms ◽  
Regulatory Regime ◽  
American Firm ◽  
Cross Listing ◽  
Corporate Insiders ◽  
Negative Role ◽  
Acute Form ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Arthur Andersen

In their seminal survey of corporate governance, Shleifer and Vishny distill the issue into a blunt question: "How do [the suppliers of finance] make sure that managers do not steal the capital they supply or invest it in bad projects?" The Enron/Arthur Andersen debacle and the ensuing wave’s of scandal vividly proved that American investors may face this question in the most acute form. To the extent that corporate governance issues play a role in the cross-listing decision, it is a negative role. Generally speaking, the foreign issuer regime "cuts corners" exactly on the issues of corporate governance relating to corporate insiders. The notion that issuers may want to improve their corporate governance by subjecting themselves to a better regulatory regime through cross-listing—say, on an American market—is appealingly elegant. If an American firm could use an NYSE listing to bond its insiders to better governance standards, why couldn’t foreign firms do the same? In an oft-cited 1999 article, Jack Coffee argues that they do just that: In other cases, however, the cross-listing may not entail corporate governance improvements. The cross-listing literature refers to differences in investor protection in three separate respects. In practice, however, foreign issuers can easily obtain an exemption from corporate governance listing requirements. The notion that corporations can self-improve their corporate governance by opting into a foreign country’s legal and regulatory regime through cross-listing has made considerable inroads into the legal and finance literature.

scholarly journals Private Benefits of Control, Ownership, and the Cross-Listing Decision

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Doidge ◽  
G. Andrew Karolyi ◽  
Karl Lins ◽  
Darius Miller ◽  
Rene Stulz
Keyword(s):  
Private Benefits ◽  
Private Benefits Of Control ◽  
Cross Listing ◽  
The Cross

Would improved information environment of a less regulated OTC market benefit blue-chip foreign firms? Evidence from the OTCQX International Market

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Kim ◽  
Steve Lin ◽  
Liu L Yang
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Abnormal Returns ◽  
International Market ◽  
Information Environment ◽  
Foreign Firms ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
Cross Listing ◽  
Bonding Effect ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Blue Chip

This study examines whether improved information environment in the OTCQX International market (hereafter QX market) benefits blue-chip foreign private issuers (FPIs). We find that around 600 FPIs traded their stocks in the QX market during 2007-2016, and they are financially better than their home-country counterparts. We also find approximately 6% abnormal return around the cross-listing days. Moreover, FPIs with higher financial reporting transparency (i.e., lower earnings smoothness and preparing financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards) experience more pronounced abnormal returns and liquidity improvement around the cross-listing days. Further analysis shows that market premium of cross listing on the QX market is not attributed to the bonding effect. Our results highlight the importance of information environment of a less regulated OTC market in benefiting large and established FPIs, which should be of interest to market regulators, investors, and foreign firms that intend to access less regulated U.S. markets.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document