scholarly journals Private Benefits of Control, Ownership, and the Cross-Listing Decision

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Doidge ◽  
G. Andrew Karolyi ◽  
Karl Lins ◽  
Darius Miller ◽  
Rene Stulz
2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Andrew Doidge ◽  
George Andrew Karolyi ◽  
Karl V. Lins ◽  
Darius P. Miller ◽  
René M. Stulz

2009 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 425-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
CRAIG DOIDGE ◽  
G. ANDREW KAROLYI ◽  
KARL V. LINS ◽  
DARIUS P. MILLER ◽  
RENÉ M. STULZ

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Stephen Paul Ferris ◽  
Min Yu Liao

Using a comprehensive set of cross-listings, we extend the bonding hypothesis by developing what we term as the  relative bonding hypothesis. We hypothesize that firms seek the advantages of stronger investor protections by listing in countries whose governance is relatively better than its own. This means that firms can achieve bonding without listing in the U.S and that the governance advantages of bonding are not only for ADRs. We find that firms are more likely to choose a cross-listing destination if the host country has better governance than the home country, except those firms from countries whose managers enjoy greater private benefits of control. We also find that there is valuation premium even when cross-listing occurs  outside of the U.S. The premia are even stronger if the host country has better governance than that of the home country. We conclude that although bonding might explain the existence of ADRs, relative bonding helps to explain the extensive cross-listing which occurs outside of the U.S. 


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 509-527
Author(s):  
Kim Hin David Ho ◽  
Kwame Addae-Dapaah ◽  
Fang Rui Lina Peck

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the common stock price reaction and the changes to the risk exposure of the cross-listing for real estate investment trusts (REITs). Design/methodology/approach The paper adopts the event study methodology to assess the abnormal returns (ARs). Pre- and post-cross-listing changes in the risk exposure for the domestic and foreign markets are examined, via a modified two-factor international asset pricing model. A comparison is made for two broad cross-listings, namely, the depositary receipts and the dual ordinary listings, to examine the impacts from institutional differences. Findings Cross-listed REITs generally experience positive and significant ARs throughout the event window, implying significant superior returns associated with the cross-listing for REITs. On systematic risks, REITs exhibit significant decline in their domestic market β coefficients after the cross-listing. However, the foreign market β coefficients do not yield conclusive evidence when compared across the sample. Research limitations/implications Results are consistent with prudential asset allocation for potential diversification gains from the cross-listing, as the reduction from the domestic market beta is more significant than changes in the foreign market beta. Practical implications The results and findings should incentivise REIT managers to explore viable cross-listing. Social implications Such cross-listing for REITs should enhance risk diversification. Originality/value This is a pioneer study on cross-listing of REITs. It provides a basis for investment decision making, and could provoke further research and discussion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document