scholarly journals Assessing the Importance of Male and Female Part-Time Work for the Gender Earnings Gap in Britain

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen A. Mumford ◽  
Peter N. Smith
Author(s):  
Maeve O'Sullivan ◽  
Christine Cross ◽  
Jonathan Lavelle

1988 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-74
Author(s):  
Jack M. Wood ◽  
Joan A. Cooper

The typical stereotype of the part-time teacher is that they are: married females who are currently employed as casual teachers, without job security; married females employed on a full-time basis wishing to work on a part-time basis; or unemployed married females seeking to enter teaching who are unable to obtain full-time teaching positions. The composition of the part-time workforce is diversifying away from this stereotype in many fields. Many single and married males now express a preference to work on a permanent part-time basis. This study examined the comparative perceptions of a random sample of male and female primary teachers regarding the costs and benefits that would be associated with the introduction of permanent part-time teaching (PPTT). The most important finding was the high degree of support for PPTT among male primary teachers. These findings challenge the widely held stereotype that only females want to work on a PPTT basis. Such results also demonstrate the magnitude of social and economic change that is occurring in education labour markets.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Halldén ◽  
Duncan Gallie ◽  
Ying Zhou

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duncan Gallie ◽  
Michael Gebel ◽  
Johannes Giesecke ◽  
Karin Halldén ◽  
Peter Van der Meer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
S.S. Hasanova ◽  
R.R. Hatueva ◽  
A.L. Arsaev

This article discusses the pros and cons of applying professional income tax. Professional income tax is not mandatory, but an alternative way to pay 2 taxes on self-employment or part-time work. The introduction of this tax can mediate an increase in revenues to the state budget, which is of particular importance for the country in post-crisis conditions.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-38
Author(s):  
David S. Pedulla ◽  
Michael J. Donnelly

Abstract The social and economic forces that shape attitudes toward the welfare state are of central concern to social scientists. Scholarship in this area has paid limited attention to how working part-time, the employment status of nearly 20% of the U.S. workforce, affects redistribution preferences. In this article, we theoretically develop and empirically test an argument about the ways that part-time work, and its relationship to gender, shape redistribution preferences. We articulate two gender-differentiated pathways—one material and one about threats to social status—through which part-time work and gender may jointly shape individuals’ preferences for redistribution. We test our argument using cross-sectional and panel data from the General Social Survey in the United States. We find that the positive relationship between part-time employment, compared to full-time employment, and redistribution preferences is stronger for men than for women. Indeed, we do not detect a relationship between part-time work and redistribution preferences among women. Our results provide support for a gendered relationship between part-time employment and redistribution preferences and demonstrate that both material and status-based mechanisms shape this association.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document