scholarly journals The skills and autonomy of female part-time work in Britain and Sweden

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Halldén ◽  
Duncan Gallie ◽  
Ying Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Time Work ◽  
Female Part ◽  
Part Time ◽  
Part Time Work

scholarly journals Good or bad jobs? Characteristics of older female part‐time work

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maeve O'Sullivan ◽  
Christine Cross ◽  
Jonathan Lavelle
Keyword(s):  
Time Work ◽  
Female Part ◽  
Part Time ◽  
Part Time Work

scholarly journals Quality of work and job satisfaction: comparing female part-time work in four European countries

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duncan Gallie ◽  
Michael Gebel ◽  
Johannes Giesecke ◽  
Karin Halldén ◽  
Peter Van der Meer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Job Satisfaction ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Quality Of Work ◽  
Time Work ◽  
Female Part ◽  
Part Time ◽  
Part Time Work

TAX FOR THE SELF-EMPLOYED: PROS AND CONS

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.S. Hasanova ◽  
R.R. Hatueva ◽  
A.L. Arsaev
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
The State ◽  
The Self ◽  
State Budget ◽  
Self Employment ◽  
Time Work ◽  
Part Time ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Crisis Conditions ◽  
Part Time Work

This article discusses the pros and cons of applying professional income tax. Professional income tax is not mandatory, but an alternative way to pay 2 taxes on self-employment or part-time work. The introduction of this tax can mediate an increase in revenues to the state budget, which is of particular importance for the country in post-crisis conditions.

The Politics of Part-Time Work: Gender, Employment Status, and Preferences for Redistribution

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-38
Author(s):  
David S. Pedulla ◽  
Michael J. Donnelly
Keyword(s):  
Employment Status ◽  
General Social Survey ◽  
The United States ◽  
Limited Attention ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Preferences For Redistribution ◽  
Time Work ◽  
Part Time ◽  
Part Time Work

Abstract The social and economic forces that shape attitudes toward the welfare state are of central concern to social scientists. Scholarship in this area has paid limited attention to how working part-time, the employment status of nearly 20% of the U.S. workforce, affects redistribution preferences. In this article, we theoretically develop and empirically test an argument about the ways that part-time work, and its relationship to gender, shape redistribution preferences. We articulate two gender-differentiated pathways—one material and one about threats to social status—through which part-time work and gender may jointly shape individuals’ preferences for redistribution. We test our argument using cross-sectional and panel data from the General Social Survey in the United States. We find that the positive relationship between part-time employment, compared to full-time employment, and redistribution preferences is stronger for men than for women. Indeed, we do not detect a relationship between part-time work and redistribution preferences among women. Our results provide support for a gendered relationship between part-time employment and redistribution preferences and demonstrate that both material and status-based mechanisms shape this association.

scholarly journals 587. Equity in academic advancement: findings from an IDSA-sponsored survey of infectious disease physicians

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S357-S357
Author(s):  
Jennifer Manne-Goehler ◽  
Douglas Krakower ◽  
Jasmine R Marcelin ◽  
Carlos Del Rio ◽  
Wendy Stead
Keyword(s):  
Poisson Regression ◽  
Women In Leadership ◽  
Full Professor ◽  
Academic Advancement ◽  
Full Professorship ◽  
Research Survey ◽  
Time Work ◽  
Academic Faculty ◽  
Part Time ◽  
Part Time Work

Abstract Background Recent evidence has shown substantial disparities in the rate of advancement to full professorship among women as compared to men faculty in academic infectious diseases (ID). We sought to identify barriers to academic advancement overall and by gender among faculty physicians in this field. Methods We conducted a web-based survey of academic faculty in ID. The survey was made available to the IDWeek2019 attendees and digitally via email and social media to the IDSA membership at large from 9/18/19 – 11/8/2019. The survey assessed demographic characteristics and barriers to faculty advancement and achievement, building on prior research. Survey themes included faculty promotion track, part-time work history and a suite of questions about workplace atmosphere and policies related to career advancement. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to evaluate the association between these factors and full professorship. Results Of 1,036 respondents, 790 were retained in the final dataset [Men: 322 (40.7%), Women: 458 (58.0%), Other: 10 (1.3%)]. 352 respondents were Instructors or Assistant Professors (38.5%), 198 were Associate Professors (25.1%) and 240 were Full Professors (30.4%). Fewer women reported that their promotion process was transparent (57.4% v. 67.6%, p=0.004) and more women Full Professors felt they had been “sponsored” compared to men at their same rank (73.3% v. 53.6%, p=0.002). In regression analyses (Table 1), gender, publications and clinical trial leadership were significantly associated with full professor rank and promotion transparency and NIH grants emerged as possible correlates of this outcome. Salary support, part-time work, women in leadership, faculty promotion track and sponsorship were not associated with this outcome. Table 1. Results of Poisson regression analysis Conclusion Sponsorship and transparency of promotion criteria differed by gender and emerged as potentially important factors associated with full professorship in academic ID. Future policies to promote equity in advancement should address these issues. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document