Residual Soil Nitrate after Potato Harvest

2003 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 607-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Bélanger ◽  
Noura Ziadi ◽  
John R. Walsh ◽  
John E. Richards ◽  
Paul H. Milburn
Keyword(s):  
Residual Soil ◽  
Soil Nitrate

Influence of the time and rate of liquid-manure application on yield and nitrogen utilization of silage corn in south coastal British Columbia

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Zebarth ◽  
J. W. Paul ◽  
O. Schmidt ◽  
R. McDougall
Keyword(s):  
British Columbia ◽  
Dairy Manure ◽  
Inorganic Fertilizer ◽  
N Recovery ◽  
Corn Yield ◽  
Residual Soil ◽  
Soil Nitrate ◽  
Liquid Manure ◽  
Manure Application ◽  
Coastal British Columbia

Manure-N availability must be known in order to design application practices that maximize the nutrient value of the manure while minimizing adverse environmental impacts. This study determined the effect of time and rate of liquid manure application on silage corn yield and N utilization, and residual soil nitrate at harvest, in south coastal British Columbia. Liquid dairy or liquid hog manure was applied at target rates of 0, 175, 350 or 525 kg N ha−1, with or without addition of 100 kg N ha−1 as inorganic fertilizer, at two sites in each of 2 yr. Time of liquid-dairy-manure application was also tested at two sites in each of 2 yr with N-application treatments of: 600 kg N ha−1 as manure applied in spring; 600 kg N ha−1 as manure applied in fall; 300 kg N ha−1 as manure applied in each of spring and fall; 200 kg N ha−1 applied as inorganic fertilizer in spring; 300 kg N ha−1 as manure plus 100 kg N ha−1 as inorganic fertilizer applied in spring; and a control that received no applied N. Fall-applied manure did not increase corn yield or N uptake in the following growing season. At all sites, maximum yield was attained using manure only. Selection of proper spring application rates for manure and inorganic fertilizer were found to be equally important in minimizing residual soil nitrate at harvest. Apparent recovery of applied N in the crop ranged from 0 to 33% for manure and from 18 to 93% for inorganic fertilizer. Key words: N recovery, manure management

A Comparison of the Use of Residual Soil Nitrate by Winter Wheat and Alfalfa in the Drylands of China’s Loess Plateau

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
李云 LI Yun ◽  
刘炜 LIU Wei ◽  
王朝辉 WANG Zhaohui ◽  
高亚军 GAO Yajun
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Loess Plateau ◽  
Residual Soil ◽  
Soil Nitrate

scholarly journals Aspects of nitrogen use efficiency of cauliflower I. A simulation modelling based analysis of nitrogen availability under field conditions

2003 ◽  
Vol 141 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. KAGE ◽  
C. ALT ◽  
H. STÜTZEL
Keyword(s):  
Root Growth ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Nitrogen Availability ◽  
Simulation Modelling ◽  
Activity Period ◽  
Nitrate Transport ◽  
Soil Conditions ◽  
Residual Soil ◽  
Soil Nitrate ◽  
N Supply

Data from several field experiments (eight crops grown under a widely varying nitrogen supply on a loess loam soil) were used for a simulation modelling based analysis of nitrogen availability of cauliflower. The model was built out of components describing root growth, nitrate transport to the roots and the vertical nitrate transport within the soil.Root observations obtained over 2 years indicated an increased fraction of dry matter allocated to the fine roots under N deficiency. An adopted version of a root growth model for cauliflower described the rooting data with an R2=0·75. Based upon an acceptable description of the soil water budget, vertical nitrate movement during the growth period of cauliflower was accurately described. The magnitude of this movement, however, was limited to soil depths of about 60 cm even after periods of high rainfall, because of a high soil water holding capacity. An analysis of the factors determining nitrate availability indicated that apparent mass flow was only of high importance for conditions of extremely high N supply where high amounts of nitrate nitrogen remain in the soil up to the end of the growing season. Otherwise, the dominating fraction of nitrate has to be transported to the roots by diffusion. Single root model based calculations of maximum nitrate transport to roots overestimated N availability as indicated by estimates of critical soil nitrate N that were too low. The introduction of a restricted uptake activity period of the roots was used to bridge the gap between theoretical calculations and empirical results. Scenario calculations were carried out to obtain functional relationships between N supply and residual soil nitrate levels for different soil conditions and management practices.

Season of year effect on response of orchardgrass to N fertilizer in a maritime climate

2004 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Bittman ◽  
B. J. Zebarth ◽  
C. G. Kowalenko ◽  
D. E. Hunt
Keyword(s):  
Crude Protein ◽  
N Uptake ◽  
Maximum Yield ◽  
Relative Yield ◽  
Dactylis Glomerata ◽  
N Fertilizer ◽  
Residual Soil ◽  
Soil Nitrate ◽  
Year Effect ◽  
Nitrate Concentrations

This study compared the response of harvests taken in May, June, August and September-October in terms of crop responses (yield, N uptake, and concentrations of crude protein and nitrate) to N fertilizer and residual soil nitrate and ammonium. Three trials were conducted in south coastal British Columbia in 1990–1992 to evaluate the response of an established sward of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) to a range of N fertilizer rates. Both yields and daily crop growth rates were highest in cut 1, lowest in cut 4 and intermediate in cuts 2 and 3. For all four cuts, 95 and 90% of maximum yield was attained at about 136 and 82 kg ha-1 of applied N, respectively. Crop N supply from non-fertilizer sources ranged from 36 to 90 kg N ha-1, of which about 52% was attributed to nitrate present in the soil prior to growth and about 48% was N released from the soil, translocated from roots or deposited from the atmosphere. At 95% of maximum yield, crude protein concentrations ranged from 147 g kg-1 in the higher yielding cut 1 to 189 g kg-1 in cuts 2 and 4, while at 90% of maximum yield concentrations were 10 g kg-1 lower in each cut. Plant nitrate concentrations were close to levels that are toxic to cattle for the 95% target yield, but relatively safe at the 90% yield. The crop removed about 50 kg ha-1 more N when fertilized for 95% of maximum yield than for 90%, which translates to over 300 kg ha-1 more crude protein. High relative yield leaves behind more soil nitrate after harvest. The results suggest that the first cut should be managed for 95% of maximum yield with about 130 kg N ha-1. Cuts 2 and 3 should be managed for 90% of maximum yield, to avoid high plant nitrate concentrations, with 100–110 kg N ha-1. Cut 4 should be given no more than 50 kg N ha-1 for less than 90% of maximum yield because of the risk of residual soil nitrates. This study shows for the first time the benefits and disadvantages of applying N at different rates for each harvest over the growing season. Key words: Plant nitrate, nitrogen use efficiency, nitrogen recovery, Dactylis glomerata, relative yield, maximum economic yield

Residual soil nitrate in irrigated Southern High Plains cotton fields and Ogallala groundwater nitrate

2009 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.F. Bronson ◽  
A. Malapati ◽  
J.D. Booker ◽  
B.R. Scanlon ◽  
W. H. Hudnall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Plains ◽  
Residual Soil ◽  
Soil Nitrate ◽  
Southern High Plains ◽  
Cotton Fields
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document