Report of the Defense Science Board Subcommittee on Department of Defense Research Policy. Part 2. Further Analysis of Basic Research Policy

1965 ◽  
Author(s):  
DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD WASHINGTON DC
Keyword(s):  
Department Of Defense ◽  
Research Policy ◽  
Basic Research ◽  
Defense Research

Limits of change: cognitive constraints on “postmodernization” and the political redirection of science

2000 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jochen Gläser
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Production ◽  
Research Policy ◽  
Basic Research ◽  
The Political ◽  
Cognitive State ◽  
Cognitive Constraints ◽  
Societal Welfare ◽  
Micro Level ◽  
Science Information ◽  
Level Of Analysis

The debate about revitalization of the finalization theory was documented in 1997 in Social Science Information. It hinted at a worthwhile methodological idea that could be useful in current debates on science—society relationships. Finalization theory asked whether a field's cognitive state constrains research policy attempts to direct the field toward applications. Since the difficulties faced in answering this question are at least partly due to the level of analysis, this article proposes refocusing finalization theory on the micro-level of research processes and research trails. On the basis of an empirical analysis, the cognitive links between basic research and contexts of applications are explored. Five types of basic research can be distinguished by their various cognitive links to contexts of application. Scientists' opportunities to change the links between their basic research and applications are discussed. Analysis on the micro-level enables conclusions to be drawn about (1) the scope of hypotheses about changes in knowledge-production and (2) constraints on institutional pressure for basic research to contribute to societal welfare.

scholarly journals The Current and Future State of Department of Defense (DoD) Microbiome Research: a Summary of the Inaugural DoD Tri-Service Microbiome Consortium Informational Meeting

mSystems ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Glaven ◽  
Kenneth Racicot ◽  
Dagmar H. Leary ◽  
J. Philip Karl ◽  
Steven Arcidiacono ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Health ◽  
Air Force ◽  
Department Of Defense ◽  
Collaborative Research ◽  
Research Policy ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Future State ◽  
Microbiome Research ◽  
And Performance

ABSTRACT The Tri-Service Microbiome Consortium (TSMC) was recently established to enhance collaboration, coordination, and communication of microbiome research among Department of Defense (DoD) organizations. The TSMC aims to serve as a forum for sharing information related to DoD microbiome research, policy, and applications, to monitor global advances relevant to human health and performance, to identify priority objectives, and to facilitate Tri-Service (Army, Navy, and Air Force) collaborative research. The inaugural TSMC workshop held on 10 to 11 May 2017 brought together almost 100 attendees from across the DoD and several key DoD partners. The meeting outcomes informed attendees of the scope of current DoD microbiome research efforts and identified knowledge gaps, collaborative/leveraging opportunities, research barriers/challenges, and future directions. This report details meeting presentations and discussions with special emphasis on Tri-Service labs’ current research activities.

scholarly journals International Comparison of Education Research Policies

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1&2) ◽  
pp. 62-70
Author(s):  
Yung Ming Shu
Keyword(s):  
Education Research ◽  
Educational Policy ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Research Policy ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Basic Research ◽  
Main Concern ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Four Dimensions

This is a comparative study of the education research policies in several countries and international organizations. The purpose of the comparison is to discover the trends in this field. Four dimensions are used for education research policy: the aims of education research, the promoted research methods, the priority areas in education research, and databases for education research. These dimensions need direction and support from government. The findings are that public interest is pursued by education research institutes. However, any research result that runs counter to current policies will be suppressed. Stakeholders, such as sponsors, researchers and journals, do not take public interest as their main concern. The most promoted method in education research is evidence-based research because it is thought to be more useful and reproducible. The priority area for education research, however, is not so evident. But basic research and new areas, like neuroscience and popular culture, are more common. There are databases for education research in many countries. PISA of OECD is the most conspicuous one in recent years. Education research and educational policy is interwoven together. Education research can contribute to educational policy, while educational policy many direct the orientation of education research. Each should have the other in mind.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document