Scheduling Standards Pilot Project Companion Activity Final Report

1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Graves ◽  
Leon F. McGinnis
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Project ◽  
Final Report

Implementation of the Australasian Teletrial Model: Translating idea into action using implementation science frameworks

2021 ◽  
pp. 1357633X2110178
Author(s):  
Sabe Sabesan ◽  
Marie Malica ◽  
Chantal Gebbie ◽  
Clare Scott ◽  
David Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Implementation Science ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Rare Cancer ◽  
Government Investment ◽  
Implementation Framework ◽  
Advisory Groups ◽  
Regulatory Systems ◽  
Key Stakeholders ◽  
Strategic Implementation

Background: Despite Government investment, disparity in access to clinical trials continue between metropolitan and regional & rural sectors (RRR) in Australia and around the world. To improve trial access closer to home for RRR communities and rare cancer patients even in metro settings, the Australasian Teletrial Model (ATM) was developed by Clinical Oncology Society of Australia and implemented in four states. Aim of this paper is to describe the steps and processes involved in the development and implementation of ATM guided by implementation science frameworks. Method: Two implementation science frameworks namely iPARIHS and Strategic Implementation Framework were chosen to guide the project. Details of steps and processes were extracted from COSA final report. Results: ATM met the criteria for worthy innovation. For the development and implementation of the ATM, stakeholders were at national, statewide and clinical levels. A co-design with end-users and inclusion of key stakeholders in steering committees and advisory groups made the implementation smoother. Clinician levers including advocacy were useful to overcome system barriers. During the project, more patients, and clinicians at RRR participated in trials, more primary sites collaborated with RRR sites and more RRR sites gained trial capabilities. Conclusion: Pilot project achieved its objectives including improved access to patients locally, creation of linkages between metro and RRR sites and enhanced capabilities of and access to RRR sites. Implementation science frameworks were useful for identifying the necessary steps and processes at the outset. Ownership by governments and creation of streamlined regulatory systems would enable broader adoption.

scholarly journals Strategic partnership with German data providing institutions on data quality (Pilot project) – Final report

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Naumann ◽  
Katja Alt ◽  
Susanne Kaus ◽  
Katrin König ◽  
Patricia Lugert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Quality ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Strategic Partnership ◽  
Final Report ◽  
German Data

The Ontario Cardiac Rehabilitation Pilot Project-Final Report

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather M. Arthur ◽  
Terri Swabey ◽  
Neville Suskin
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Final Report

scholarly journals Responsible court in the global world – managerism or managerialism

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylwia Morawska ◽  
Przemysław Banasik
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Institutional Development ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Business Practices ◽  
Good Practices ◽  
The World ◽  
Effectiveness And Efficiency

One can look at the improvement of the effectiveness and efficiency of the justice system from three perspectives: macro, mezo, and micro. After all, the general goal is to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the justice system as a whole (the macro perspective), the courts (the mezo scale), and court proceedings  (the micro scale). The need to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the justice system was noticed in the Strategy of modernization of justice  in Poland in the years 2014–2020 prepared by the Ministry of Justice incorporates the three abovementioned perspectives. From the perspective of this paper, emphasis has been placed on courts. The Strategy, as a matter of fact, assumes that the improvement of  the effectiveness and efficiency of courts may occur by introducing a model of management based on the idea of “managerialism” to run them. Effective and efficient courts, just like the proceedings they operate, are particularly important in the face of globalization, regulatory arbitration, as well as forum shopping. Based on a case study, this paper outlines the results of an innovative pilot project of implementing management methods of running common courts, and sets out to answer the question of the extent to which the state of institutional development of courts allows one to employ good practices in courts already successful in the world of business. During the pilot study, in 60 selected regional, district, and appellate courts, with the support of external experts, „good practices” were implemented to serve as management enhancements (Final report…, 2014..). The results of the pilot study prove that the level of institutional development of courts determines the possibility of introducing good management practices that have already been approved in the world of business. This situation is further complicated by the diverse level of institutional development among courts. The type of a given court (its size, regional, district, appellate) may impact the possible upgrade of the maturity of the way a given practice functions. Also, not all business practices are eligible for implementation, given the different level of managers’ competence, as well as the frequently clear process of taking on the management staff.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document