Audit Oversight: Report on Quality Control Review of KPMG, LLP and Defense Contract Audit Agency Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-133 Audit Report of Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1997

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne C. Berry ◽  
M. T. Heacock ◽  
Janet Stern ◽  
David H. Griffin ◽  
Krista S. Gordon
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
Fiscal Year ◽  
Technology Research ◽  
Audit Report ◽  
Illinois Institute ◽  
Defense Contract ◽  
Institute Of Technology ◽  
Research Institute

Determinant of Audit Report Lag Among Mining Companies in Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Sari Angriany Natonis ◽  
Bambang Tjahjadi
Keyword(s):  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Fiscal Year ◽  
Company Size ◽  
Audit Report ◽  
Public Accounting ◽  
Audit Opinion ◽  
Accounting Firm ◽  
Mining Companies

Time period in completing the audit work until the date of publishing audit report is called audit report lag. BAPEPAM requires each of going-public companies to publish their annual reports not later than three months after the fiscal year ends. The aim of this research was to determine the effect of profitability, solvency, company size, audit opinion, and size of public accounting firm on audit report lag at mining companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period of 2013-2017. As many as 12 samples were obtained through purposive sampling technique. The data analysis technique used was the multiple regression analysis. The results showed that the profitability and company size negatively affected the audit report lag, while the other variables, such as solvency, audit opinion, and size of public accounting firm, had no significant effect on the audit report. The result of simultaneous test showed that all independent variables influenced audit report lag with 32.8% of determination coefficient.

Additional Evidence on Audit Report Lag

2001 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Robert Knechel ◽  
Jeff L. Payne
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Quality ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Financial Statement ◽  
Fiscal Year ◽  
Sources Of Information ◽  
Audit Report ◽  
The Public ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Audit Team ◽  
Available Information

The process for providing accounting information to the public has not changed much in the last century even though the extent of disclosure has increased signifi-cantly. Sundem et al. (1996) suggest that the primary benefit of audited financial statements may not be decision usefulness but the discipline imposed by timely confirmation of previously available information. In general, the value of information from the audited financial statement will decline as the audit report lag (the time period between a company's fiscal year end and the date of the audit report) increases since competitively oriented users may obtain substitute sources of information. Furthermore, the literature on earnings quality and earnings management suggests that unexpected reporting delays may be associated with lower quality information. The purpose of this paper is to extend our understanding about the determinants of audit report lag using a proprietary database containing 226 audit engagements from an international public accounting firm. We examine three previously uninvestigated audit firm factors that potentially influence audit report lag and are controllable by the auditor: (1) incremental audit effort (e.g., hours), (2) the resource allocation of audit team effort measured by rank (partner, manager, or staff), and (3) the provision of nonaudit services (MAS and tax). The results indicate that incremental audit effort, the presence of contentious tax issues, and the use of less experienced audit staff are positively correlated with audit report lag. Further, audit report lag is decreased by the potential synergistic relationship between MAS and audit services.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document