Quasi-Binary Decision Making Using Light Scattering

1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Hu ◽  
M. Lax
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Light Scattering ◽  
Binary Decision

scholarly journals Decision making process via binary decision diagram

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Pliego Marugán ◽  
Fausto Pedro García Márquez ◽  
José Lorente
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Binary Decision Diagram ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Binary Decision

Predictor combination in binary decision-making situations.

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. McGrath
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Binary Decision

scholarly journals Optimal Control of Coherent Light Scattering for Binary Decision Problems

2021 ◽  
Vol 127 (25) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorian Bouchet ◽  
Lukas M. Rachbauer ◽  
Stefan Rotter ◽  
Allard P. Mosk ◽  
Emmanuel Bossy
Keyword(s):  
Optimal Control ◽  
Light Scattering ◽  
Decision Problems ◽  
Coherent Light ◽  
Binary Decision ◽  
Coherent Light Scattering

scholarly journals Intraparietal stimulation disrupts negative distractor effects in human multi-alternative decision-making

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Kohl ◽  
Michelle Wong ◽  
Jing Jun Wong ◽  
Matthew Rushworth ◽  
Bolton Chau
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Causal Link ◽  
Decision Space ◽  
Binary Decision ◽  
Distractor Effect ◽  
Divisive Normalization ◽  
Human Decision ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Alternative Decision ◽  
Different Parts

Abstract There has been debate about whether addition of an irrelevant distractor option to an otherwise binary decision influences which of the two choices is taken. We show that disparate views on this question are reconciled if distractors exert two opposing but not mutually exclusive effects. Each effect predominates in a different part of decision space: 1) a positive distractor effect predicts high-value distractors improve decision-making; 2) a negative distractor effect, of the type associated with divisive normalisation models, entails decreased accuracy with increased distractor values. Here, we demonstrate both distractor effects coexist in human decision making but in different parts of a decision space defined by the choice values. We show disruption of the medial intraparietal area (MIP) by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) increases positive distractor effects at the expense of negative distractor effects. Furthermore, individuals with larger MIP volumes are also less susceptible to the disruption induced by TMS. These findings also demonstrate a causal link between MIP and the impact of distractors on decision-making via divisive normalization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document