Testing Protocol And Economic Analysis of Mud Dewatering For Closed-loop Drilling Systems

10.2118/94-19 ◽  
1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew K. Wojtanowicz
Author(s):  
Daniel Gerrior ◽  
Khashayar Delsoz Bahri ◽  
Azadeh Kermanshahi-Pour ◽  
Mathew J. Eckelman ◽  
Satinder Kaur Brar

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 278-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirill Murashko ◽  
Markku Nikku ◽  
Ekaterina Sermyagina ◽  
Johanna Julia Vauterin ◽  
Timo Hyppänen ◽  
...  

1981 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. T. Sayer

ABSTRACTIn the extensive literature on the rules versus discretion debate three related, but logically distinct, areas of debate are frequently confused: the active versus passive policy debate, the rules versus discretion debate proper, and the open-loop (i.e. fixed) rule versus closed-loop (i.e. contingent) rule debate. Section 2 of this paper examines the nature of and interrelations between these three areas of debate. In section 3 the contributions of economic analysis to the debate are explored in an apolitical framework, in particular, the arguments for rules proposed by Friedman and Kydland and Prescott are assessed. Section 4 extends this framework to take into account the political dimension and the rules versus discretion debate is viewed as a cost-benefit problem involving both political and economic factors. A general conclusion is that since the rules versus discretion debate is an exercise in political economy, the debate cannot be properly assessed in the sterile apolitical framework of pure economic analysis.


1961 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
George H. Bornside ◽  
Isidore Cohn
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document