Laboratory Studies of Gasification Kinetics for Western Coals Under Conditions Expected During In-Situ Combustion

1981 ◽  
Vol 21 (06) ◽  
pp. 740-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Young ◽  
Jack Fischer ◽  
Samuel H. Wong

Abstract Kinetics for the reaction of steam with western U.S. subbituminous chars are described for operating conditions characteristic of those expected during underground coal gasification (UCG). The mineral matter present in these coals has been found to have significant catalytic activity for the water/gas shift reaction. Also, the inorganic constituents of brackish waters occurring naturally in western aquifers have been found to have little effect on the gasification rates. Introduction The in-situ gasification of coal offers significant potential as a means of increasing U.S. utilization of underground hydrocarbons for fuel conversion or producing petrochemical feedstocks. The primary advantage of in-situ gasification is utilization of coal reserves that cannot be recovered economically by conventional techniques. Additional advantages lie in the potential reduction of capital and operating costs, pollution control costs, feedwater quality requirements, and health and safety problems associated with conventional coal-processing technologies. Early efforts to develop in-situ gasification technology have been described in reviews by Capp et al.1 and Elder.2 Since the 1930's, there have been extensive developmental efforts in the USSR, and since 1972 there has been a resurgence of experimental studies - both in the laboratory and in the field - in the U.S. and Canada. Both Soviet tests and recent tests carried out in the Western Hemisphere are discussed in detail in Ref. 3. Depending on the geological conditions of the coal seam and the properties of the coal, the configuration and operating procedures of an underground gasifier can vary significantly. Regardless of the configuration of the underground gasifier and the preparation techniques used for coal seam gasification, the gasifier can be envisioned as consisting of several distinct reaction zones very similar to those occurring in moving-bed gas producers, such as a Lurgi gasifier. The zone nearest the product recovery well is the drying and pyrolysis zone, in which water is driven from the coal and the pyrolysis reactions occur. Tars produced in this zone are driven forward continually into the cooler regions of the seam, with a portion being cracked to lighter hydrocarbons. Cracking proceeds until the tars are light enough to be carried with the product gas stream out of the coal seam. The reducing zone or gasification zone is immediately behind the pyrolysis zone. In this area, the primary reactions areEquations 1 through 5 The water necessary for Reaction 1 is supplied either by injection of steam with the air or oxygen or by natural intrusion of water into the reaction zone if the coal seam is a natural aquifer (as is the case for many western coal seams). Behind the gasification zone is the combustion zone that supplies the process heat. Heat is transferred from the combustion zone to the gasification zones primarily by convection of the product gases rather than by conduction through the solid char and coal.

1975 ◽  
Vol 15 (05) ◽  
pp. 425-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.F. Magnani ◽  
S.M. Farouq Ali

Abstract This investigation focuses on mathematical modeling of the process of underground gasification of coal by the stream method. A one-dimensional, steady-state model consisting of five coupled differential equations was formulated, and the solution, extracted analytically, was used to develop closed-form expressions for the parameters influencing coal gasification. The model then was used for interpreting field performance curves, predicting the results of The performance curves, predicting the results of The field tests, and ascertaining the over-all process sensitivity to the input variables. The usefulness of the model was shown by establishing the parameters influencing the success or failure of parameters influencing the success or failure of an underground gasification project. Introduction One method of eliminating many of the technological and environmental difficulties encountered during the production of synthetic gas through aboveground coal gasification involves gasifying cod in situ. This process, known as underground coal gasification, was first proposed in 1868 by Sir William Siemens and is based on the controlled combustion of coal in situ. This in-situ combustion results in the production of an artificial or synthetic gas that is rich in carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and hydrocarbon gases. Despite the fact that reaction stoichiometry is a moot element of underground coal gasification, it is nonetheless believed thatcarbon dioxide is formed by the partial oxidation of coal,carbon monoxide is generated by the subsequent reduction of carbon dioxide, andthe hydrogen and hydrocarbon gases result from the water-gas reaction and carbonization of coal, respectively. To effect the controlled combustion of coal in situ, the coal seam first must be ignited and a means must be provided for supporting combustion (through injection of a suitable gasification agent) and producing the gases generated underground. Fig. 1 presents a schematic diagram of an underground gasification system that complies with these requirements. This approach to gasifying coal is known as the stream or channel method and necessitates drilling two parallel galleries, one serving as an injection gas inlet and the other as a producer gas outlet. These wells are then linked by a borehole drilled horizontally through the coal seam. Ignition occurs in the coal seam at the gas inlet and proceeds in the direction of flow. The combustion front thus generated moves essentially perpendicular to the direction of gas flow. perpendicular to the direction of gas flow.Since the technological inception of underground gasification, over 1,500 publications have appeared in the literature that bear testimony to the absence of a complete, legitimate, theoretical analysis of the underground gasification process. Given this observation, it is the basis of this paper that progress in underground coal-gasification research progress in underground coal-gasification research has suffered from the absence of "interpretative theory"; that is, it has suffered from a lack of logical, physical, and mathematical analysis of the governing and underlying aerothermochemical principles. The difficulties in formulating a principles. The difficulties in formulating a mathematical model adequately describing the numerous phenomena involved during coal gasification are indeed formidable. SPEJ P. 425


1978 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 105-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.B. Thorsness ◽  
R.B. Rozsa

Abstract One concept for in-situ coal gasification involves fracturing thick, deep, coal seams using chemical explosives. The resultant high-permeability zone then would be ignited and reacted with a steam/ oxygen mixture to produce medium-Btu gas suitable for upgrading to pipeline quality in a surface plant. This paper discusses the calculational modeling and supporting laboratory experiments relating to the gasification process. The primary aim of this preliminary work is to predict and correlate reaction preliminary work is to predict and correlate reaction and thermal-front propagation rates and product gas composition as a function of bed properties and process operating conditions. process operating conditions. Our initial efforts are restricted to onedimensional, transient Darcy flow in a permeable packed bed. The numerical calculations include a packed bed. The numerical calculations include a detailed description of the reacting system chemistry (13 species) with appropriate reaction rates and over-all heat and mass transport in the system. Comparison of calculated results with experimental data from a packed-bed combustion tube shows good agreement for reaction-zone propagation rates and produced-gas compositions. propagation rates and produced-gas compositions. However, the sensitivity of the calculations to other reaction-rate and transport-coefficient models should be investigated. Introduction In-situ coal gasification has received renewed interest recently. It offers four potential advantages over conventional mining and subsequent surface processing of coal: (1) the product gas may be processing of coal:the product gas may be cheaper because of lower capital investment requirements;environmental damage is likely to be lower;hazards to miners are avoided; andit may make possible the exploitation of coal resources too deeply buried for economical recovery by conventional strip or deep mining operations. The Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (LLL) packed-bed concept for coal gasification was packed-bed concept for coal gasification was originated in 1972. Major program funding by the U.S. ERDA began in 1974. The LLL concept is designed to recover medium-Btu gas from the thick, deeply buried, subbituminous coal deposits prevalent in the western U.S. After upgrading in a prevalent in the western U.S. After upgrading in a surface facility the product gas would have sufficiently high energy density to make pipeline distribution attractive economically. The packed-bed concept calls for creating a permeable zone of coal by detonating chemical permeable zone of coal by detonating chemical explosives in an array of drilled boreholes. The top of the resulting permeable zone is supplied and a steam/oxygen reactant mixture is supplied. The oxidation reactions produce a high-temperature zone that propagates through the bed as a slowmoving thermal wave. The thermal wave first dries the coal downstream from the reaction zone and then pyrolyzes (devolatilizes) it, forming a char. The char undergoes further reactions with the steam present. The major products of the over-all process include H2, CO, CH4, and CO2 as gases, process include H2, CO, CH4, and CO2 as gases, and water and tar as liquids. Mathematical modeling and laboratory experimentation have been carried out to increase understanding of the important parameters of the in-situ gasification process. The purpose of this paper is to present a mathematical description of paper is to present a mathematical description of the gasification process, together with results obtained from calculations and laboratory-scale gasification reactor experiments. The long-range goal of our modeling effort is to acquire the ability to predict resource recovery for a variety of different field geometries and operating conditions. This is a multidimensional, multiphase flow problem. The preliminary model described here is a transient, one-dimensional model of the gasification process in a packed bed. The primary reason for its development is to provide a framework in which to test the importance of accurate specification of the large number of physical and chemical processes involved in gasification. This will be accomplished primarily through comparisons with carefully controlled experiments performed in the 1.6-m reactor. SPEJ P. 105


Energies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fa-qiang Su ◽  
Akihiro Hamanaka ◽  
Ken-ichi Itakura ◽  
Gota Deguchi ◽  
Wenyan Zhang ◽  
...  

The Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) system is a clean technology for obtaining energy from coal. The coaxial UCG system is supposed to be compact and flexible in order to adapt to complicated geological conditions caused by the existence of faults and folds in the ground. In this study, the application of a coaxial UCG system with a horizontal well is discussed, by means of an ex situ model UCG experiment in a large-scale simulated coal seam with dimensions of 550 × 600 × 2740 mm. A horizontal well with a 45-mm diameter and a 2600-mm length was used as an injection/production well. During the experiment, changes in temperature field and product gas compositions were observed when changing the outlet position of the injection pipe. It was found that the UCG reactor is unstable and expands continuously due to fracturing activity caused by coal crack initiation and extension under the influence of thermal stress. Therefore, acoustic emission (AE) is considered an effective tool to monitor fracturing activities and visualize the gasification zone of coal. The results gathered from monitoring of AEs agree with the measured data of temperatures; the source location of AE was detected around the region where temperature increased. The average calorific value of the produced gas was 6.85 MJ/Nm3, and the gasification efficiency, defined as the conversion efficiency of the gasified coal to syngas, was 65.43%, in the whole experimental process. The study results suggest that the recovered coal energy from a coaxial UCG system is comparable to that of a conventional UCG system. Therefore, a coaxial UCG system may be a feasible option to utilize abandoned underground coal resources without mining.


Author(s):  
E.D. Boyes ◽  
P.L. Gai ◽  
D.B. Darby ◽  
C. Warwick

The extended crystallographic defects introduced into some oxide catalysts under operating conditions may be a consequence and accommodation of the changes produced by the catalytic activity, rather than always being the origin of the reactivity. Operation without such defects has been established for the commercially important tellurium molybdate system. in addition it is clear that the point defect density and the electronic structure can both have a significant influence on the chemical properties and hence on the effectiveness (activity and selectivity) of the material as a catalyst. SEM/probe techniques more commonly applied to semiconductor materials, have been investigated to supplement the information obtained from in-situ environmental cell HVEM, ultra-high resolution structure imaging and more conventional AEM and EPMA chemical microanalysis.


1972 ◽  
Vol 68 (2_Supplb) ◽  
pp. S9-S25 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Urquhart ◽  
Nancy Keller

ABSTRACT Two techniques for organ perfusion with blood are described which provide a basis for exploring metabolic or endocrine dynamics. The technique of in situ perfusion with autogenous arterial blood is suitable for glands or small organs which receive a small fraction of the animal's cardiac output; thus, test stimulatory or inhibitory substances can be added to the perfusing blood and undergo sufficient dilution in systemic blood after passage through the perfused organ so that recirculation does not compromise experimental control over test substance concentration in the perfusate. Experimental studies with the in situ perfused adrenal are described. The second technique, termed the pilot organ method, is suitable for organs which receive a large fraction of the cardiac output, such as the liver. Vascular connections are made between the circulation of an intact, anaesthetized large (> 30 kg) dog and the liver of a small (< 3 kg) dog. The small dog's liver (pilot liver) is excised and floated in a bath of canine ascites, and its venous effluent is continuously returned to the large dog. Test substances are infused into either the hepatic artery or portal vein of the pilot liver, but the small size of the pilot liver and its blood flow in relation to the large dog minimize recirculation effects. A number of functional parameters of the pilot liver are described.


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (13) ◽  
pp. 4034
Author(s):  
Paolo Iodice ◽  
Massimo Cardone

Among the alternative fuels existing for spark-ignition engines, ethanol is considered worldwide as an important renewable fuel when mixed with pure gasoline because of its favorable physicochemical properties. An in-depth and updated investigation on the issue of CO and HC engine out emissions related to use of ethanol/gasoline fuels in spark-ignition engines is therefore necessary. Starting from our experimental studies on engine out emissions of a last generation spark-ignition engine fueled with ethanol/gasoline fuels, the aim of this new investigation is to offer a complete literature review on the present state of ethanol combustion in last generation spark-ignition engines under real working conditions to clarify the possible change in CO and HC emissions. In the first section of this paper, a comparison between physicochemical properties of ethanol and gasoline is examined to assess the practicability of using ethanol as an alternative fuel for spark-ignition engines and to investigate the effect on engine out emissions and combustion efficiency. In the next section, this article focuses on the impact of ethanol/gasoline fuels on CO and HC formation. Many studies related to combustion characteristics and exhaust emissions in spark-ignition engines fueled with ethanol/gasoline fuels are thus discussed in detail. Most of these experimental investigations conclude that the addition of ethanol with gasoline fuel mixtures can really decrease the CO and HC exhaust emissions of last generation spark-ignition engines in several operating conditions.


Fuel ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 284 ◽  
pp. 118972
Author(s):  
Dong Liu ◽  
Junshi Tang ◽  
Ruonan Zheng ◽  
Qiang Song

Author(s):  
Xiaojie Fang ◽  
Caifang Wu ◽  
Xiuming Jiang ◽  
Ningning Liu ◽  
Dan Zhou ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 295-298 ◽  
pp. 2980-2984
Author(s):  
Xiang Qian Wang ◽  
Da Fa Yin ◽  
Zhao Ning Gao ◽  
Qi Feng Zhao

Based on the geological conditions of 6# coal seam and 8# coal seam in Xieqiao Coal Mine, to determine reasonable entry layout of lower seam in multi-seam mining, alternate internal entry layout, alternate exterior entry layout and overlapping entry layout were put forward and simulated by FLAC3D. Then stress distribution and displacement characteristics of surrounding rock were analyzed in the three ways of entry layout, leading to the conclusion that alternate internal entry layout is a better choice for multi-seam mining, for which makes the entry located in stress reduce zone and reduces the influence of abutment pressure of upper coal seam mining to a certain extent,. And the mining practice of Xieqiao Coal Mine tested the results, which will offer a beneficial reference for entry layout with similar geological conditions in multi-seam mining.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document